Department of Defense contract awarded to ASHBRITT INC for waste collection services valued at over $14.7 million

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,717,926 ($14.7M)

Contractor: Ashbritt Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-03-18

End Date: 2009-12-31

Contract Duration: 1,384 days

Daily Burn Rate: $10.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 22

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Place of Performance

Location: ABBEVILLE, LAFAYETTE County, MISSISSIPPI, 38601

State: Mississippi Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $14.7 million to ASHBRITT INC for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract duration of 1384 days indicates a long-term need for these services. 3. The firm fixed-price contract type helps manage cost certainty for the government. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 562119 points to specialized waste collection. 5. The contract was awarded to ASHBRITT INC, a company with a significant federal contract history. 6. The contract was awarded under the 'Other Waste Collection' category, highlighting a specific service area.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract requires more detailed cost breakdowns and comparisons to similar waste collection services procured by the Department of Defense or other federal agencies. Without specific performance metrics or unit cost data, it is difficult to definitively assess value for money. However, the total award amount of over $14.7 million over its duration suggests a substantial service requirement.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' indicating that while the competition was generally open, certain sources may have been excluded prior to the final award. The presence of 22 bids suggests a robust level of competition, which typically leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of this award is beneficial for taxpayers, as it likely drove down prices and ensured that the government received competitive offers for the waste collection services.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and its installations requiring waste collection services. The services delivered include specialized waste collection, crucial for maintaining operational readiness and environmental compliance. The contract's geographic impact is likely concentrated in Mississippi, where the contract was administered. Workforce implications could include employment opportunities for personnel involved in waste management and logistics.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if the fixed-price contract does not adequately account for unforeseen operational challenges.
Dependence on a single contractor, ASHBRITT INC, could pose risks if performance issues arise.
The 'exclusion of sources' clause warrants further investigation to understand its impact on competition.

Positive Signals

The firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
A high number of bids (22) indicates strong market interest and potential for competitive pricing.
The long contract duration suggests a stable, ongoing need for these essential services.

Sector Analysis

The waste collection services sector is a critical component of infrastructure support for government operations. This contract falls under the broader category of environmental services and logistics. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar large-scale waste management contracts within the federal government would provide further context for assessing the value and scale of this award.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication from the provided data that this contract included a small business set-aside. Therefore, the direct impact on small businesses through set-aside provisions is likely minimal. However, ASHBRITT INC may engage small businesses as subcontractors, which would have an indirect impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant Department of the Army contracting office. Accountability measures would be tied to the contract's performance standards and delivery requirements. Transparency is facilitated by contract award databases, though detailed performance reports may not always be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Waste Management Contracts
Federal Environmental Services Procurement
Logistics and Support Services Contracts
General Services Administration (GSA) Schedules (if applicable)

Risk Flags

Potential for reduced competition due to 'exclusion of sources'.
Lack of detailed performance metrics makes value assessment difficult.
Reliance on a single contractor for a critical service.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $14.7 million to ASHBRITT INC. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ASHBRITT INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-03-18. End: 2009-12-31.

What is the historical performance record of ASHBRITT INC with the Department of Defense and other federal agencies?

ASHBRITT INC has a significant history of federal contracting, particularly with the Department of Defense. Analyzing their past performance on similar waste collection or logistics contracts is crucial. This includes reviewing past performance evaluations, any documented disputes or contract terminations, and their overall track record in meeting delivery schedules and quality standards. A review of contract databases and CPARS (Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System) would provide insights into their reliability and effectiveness as a federal contractor.

How does the per-unit cost of services under this contract compare to industry benchmarks for similar waste collection services?

Determining the precise per-unit cost requires access to the detailed pricing structure within the contract, which is not fully provided. However, a comparison to industry benchmarks for waste collection services, adjusted for factors like geographic location, type of waste, frequency of collection, and regulatory compliance requirements, would be necessary. If the contract specifies rates for specific services (e.g., per ton collected, per pickup), these could be benchmarked against publicly available data from waste management industry reports or government cost-effectiveness studies for similar procurements.

What are the specific risks associated with the 'exclusion of sources' in the competition process for this contract?

The phrase 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' implies that while the competition was intended to be broad, certain potential bidders were disqualified or not considered prior to the final award stage. The specific risks depend on the rationale for exclusion. If sources were excluded based on legitimate technical or capability requirements, the risk might be minimal. However, if exclusions were arbitrary or lacked clear justification, it could indicate a potential for reduced competition, potentially leading to higher prices or less optimal solutions for the government. Further investigation into the justification for exclusion is warranted.

What is the estimated total value of waste collection services procured by the Department of Defense annually, and how does this contract fit within that spending?

The Department of Defense is a massive organization with extensive global operations, requiring a wide array of support services, including waste management. Annual spending on waste collection can vary significantly based on operational tempo, base closures/openings, and specific mission requirements. This $14.7 million contract represents a portion of that overall spending, likely focused on a specific region or set of installations. To contextualize its significance, one would need to compare it against the total DoD budget for facilities maintenance and logistics, or aggregate spending on similar waste management contracts across the entire department.

Are there any performance metrics or key performance indicators (KPIs) defined in the contract that can be used to assess the contractor's effectiveness?

The provided data does not detail the specific performance metrics or KPIs established within the contract. Effective oversight and value assessment rely heavily on these defined standards. Typically, waste collection contracts would include metrics related to timely pickups, proper disposal methods, compliance with environmental regulations, waste diversion rates (recycling), and customer satisfaction. Without these KPIs, it is challenging to quantitatively measure the contractor's performance and ensure the government is receiving the expected level of service and value for its investment.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Waste Collection › Other Waste Collection

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 22

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 480 S ANDREWS AVE ST2103, POMPANO BEACH, FL, 23

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W912P805D0025

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline