DoD's $132M Software Contract with Softmart Government Services Raises Questions on Value and Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $132,135,819 ($132.1M)

Contractor: Softmart Government Services, Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-09-20

End Date: 2009-05-30

Contract Duration: 983 days

Daily Burn Rate: $134.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 9

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: ORDER 21996-C3

Place of Performance

Location: DOWNINGTOWN, CHESTER County, PENNSYLVANIA, 19335

State: Pennsylvania Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $132.1 million to SOFTMART GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC for work described as: ORDER 21996-C3 Key points: 1. Significant spending of $132M on software publishing. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, but specific details on price discovery are limited. 3. Potential risk associated with a firm fixed-price contract over a long duration. 4. Sector context: Software publishing is a dynamic field requiring continuous evaluation of technology and pricing.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $132M over approximately 3 years is substantial. Without specific unit cost data or comparison to similar software publishing contracts, assessing value for money is challenging. The firm fixed-price nature suggests a defined scope, but market shifts in software can impact its long-term value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which is generally positive for price discovery. However, the limited data provided does not detail the bidding process or the number of bidders, making it difficult to assess the effectiveness of the competition in driving down costs.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently. However, the overall value and necessity of the software over the contract's lifespan will ultimately determine the true taxpayer impact.

Public Impact

Taxpayers funded a significant contract for software publishing services. The Department of the Army utilized a competitive process for this acquisition. The contract duration and fixed-price nature may have implications for adaptability to evolving software needs.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of detailed pricing benchmarks.
  • Potential for overpayment due to fixed-price contract in a rapidly changing software market.
  • Limited insight into the specific software procured and its ongoing utility.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded under full and open competition.
  • Contract has a defined end date.

Sector Analysis

The software publishing sector is characterized by rapid innovation and evolving licensing models. Benchmarking spending in this area requires careful consideration of the specific software, its criticality, and the prevailing market rates for similar solutions.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses, as the 'sb' field is false. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses had an opportunity to compete or if this was a large-scale enterprise solution.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight of this contract would involve monitoring performance, ensuring deliverables meet requirements, and validating that the firm fixed-price remained appropriate throughout the contract term. The 'aw' field indicates 'DO', suggesting a Departmental Order, which may have specific oversight protocols.

Related Government Programs

  • Software Publishers
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Lack of detailed cost breakdown.
  • Potential for technology obsolescence within a fixed-price contract.
  • Limited information on specific software utility and performance.
  • No indication of small business participation.

Tags

software-publishers, department-of-defense, pa, do, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $132.1 million to SOFTMART GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC. ORDER 21996-C3

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SOFTMART GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $132.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-09-20. End: 2009-05-30.

What was the specific software procured under this contract, and how did its capabilities align with the Army's evolving needs over the contract period?

The provided data does not specify the exact software. Understanding the nature of the software (e.g., operating systems, specialized applications, development tools) is crucial. Its alignment with the Army's needs would be assessed by reviewing contract performance reports, user feedback, and any modifications or extensions granted during its term, to ensure it remained relevant and effective.

Given the firm fixed-price structure and the dynamic nature of software, what mechanisms were in place to mitigate the risk of the government overpaying for outdated technology?

Mitigation strategies for fixed-price software contracts often include clauses for price adjustments based on market changes, regular performance reviews, and options for early termination if technology becomes obsolete. The effectiveness of these mechanisms would depend on the specific contract language and the government's proactive management in monitoring software lifecycles and market trends.

How did the full and open competition process ensure the best possible price and value for the government compared to other contracting methods?

Full and open competition theoretically maximizes the pool of potential bidders, fostering a competitive environment that drives down prices and encourages innovative solutions. To confirm its effectiveness here, one would examine the number of bids received, the variance in proposed prices, and whether the winning bid represented a significant cost saving compared to initial estimates or sole-source alternatives.

Industry Classification

NAICS: InformationSoftware PublishersSoftware Publishers

Product/Service Code: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT (INCLD FIRMWARE) SOFTWARE,SUPPLIES& SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 9

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Softmart, Inc. (UEI: 050383223)

Address: 450 ACORN LN, DOWNINGTOWN, PA, 06

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $132,137,805

Exercised Options: $132,137,805

Current Obligation: $132,135,819

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0010402AZE84

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2006-09-20

Current End Date: 2009-05-30

Potential End Date: 2009-05-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2010-09-02

More Contracts from Softmart Government Services, Inc

View all Softmart Government Services, Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending