DoD's $128.5M Petroleum Contract with ExxonMobil Raises Questions on Competition and Value
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $213,267,629 ($213.3M)
Contractor: Exxon Mobil Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2005-11-08
End Date: 2010-06-30
Contract Duration: 1,695 days
Daily Burn Rate: $125.8K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT
Sector: Energy
Official Description: 200611!008504!97AS!SP0600!DEFENSE ENERGY SUPPORT CENTER !SP060005D0508 !A!N! !N!B001 !02 !20051108!20060630!128519233!128519233!001213214!N!EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION !3225 GALLOWS ROAD - RM 5D2!FAIRFAX !VA!22037!00000! !IT! ! !ITALY !+000030420972!N!N!000000000000!9130!LIQUID PROPELLANTS & FUEL, PETROLEUM BASE !A8A!PETROLEUM !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !324110!E! !3!B!S!B! !D!20060630!B! ! !A! !D!U!K!1!001!N!1G!Z!N!Z!B!IT!Y!L!U! ! ! ! ! !A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $213.3 million to EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION for work described as: 200611!008504!97AS!SP0600!DEFENSE ENERGY SUPPORT CENTER !SP060005D0508 !A!N! !N!B001 !02 !20051108!20060630!128519233!128519233!001213214!N!EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION !3225 GALLOWS ROAD - RM 5D2!FAIRFAX !VA!22037!00000! !IT! ! … Key points: 1. The contract awarded to ExxonMobil for liquid propellants and fuel totals $128.5 million. 2. Awarded as 'Not Competed', raising concerns about price discovery and potential overpayment. 3. The fixed-price contract with economic price adjustment introduces risk of fluctuating costs. 4. Sector context: Petroleum products are critical for defense operations, but competition is vital for cost efficiency.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract value of $128.5 million for petroleum products needs benchmarking against similar DoD contracts. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if this price represents fair market value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
The contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This limits price discovery and may lead to higher costs for taxpayers as there was no market pressure to offer the best price.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition on this significant contract could result in taxpayers paying more than necessary for essential petroleum products.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may be overpaying for critical fuel supplies due to a lack of competitive bidding. Dependence on a single supplier for essential defense fuels could pose a supply chain risk. The economic price adjustment clause adds uncertainty to the final cost, potentially increasing the burden on taxpayers.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of Competition
- Sole-Source Award
- Economic Price Adjustment
Positive Signals
- Essential Service Provided
- Long-Term Contract
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the petroleum industry, specifically for liquid propellants and fuel. Defense spending in this sector is crucial but often subject to price volatility and supply chain risks, making competitive procurement essential.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication in the provided data whether small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. The sole-source nature of the award further suggests limited opportunities for small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The 'Not Competed' status warrants further investigation by oversight bodies to ensure the government obtained the best possible value and that the justification for sole-source procurement was sound.
Related Government Programs
- Petroleum Refineries
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Logistics Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of Competition
- Sole-Source Award
- Economic Price Adjustment Clause
- Potential for Overpayment
- Limited Oversight Visibility
Tags
petroleum-refineries, department-of-defense, do, 100m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $213.3 million to EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION. 200611!008504!97AS!SP0600!DEFENSE ENERGY SUPPORT CENTER !SP060005D0508 !A!N! !N!B001 !02 !20051108!20060630!128519233!128519233!001213214!N!EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION !3225 GALLOWS ROAD - RM 5D2!FAIRFAX !VA!22037!00000! !IT! ! !ITALY !+000030420972!N!N!000000000000!9130!LIQUID PROPELLANTS & FUEL, PETROLEUM BASE !A8A!PETROLEUM !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !324110!E! !3!B!S!B! !D!200
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Logistics Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $213.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-11-08. End: 2010-06-30.
What was the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis instead of seeking competitive bids?
The justification for a sole-source award typically involves circumstances where only one responsible source can provide the required supplies or services. This could be due to unique capabilities, proprietary technology, or urgent and compelling needs. Without further documentation, the specific rationale remains unclear, but it is a critical point for oversight.
How does the economic price adjustment clause impact the final cost and taxpayer exposure?
The economic price adjustment (EPA) clause allows for changes in contract price based on fluctuations in specified economic factors, such as material costs or labor rates. For petroleum products, this often means the price can increase if market prices for crude oil or refined products rise, directly impacting the final cost to the government and taxpayers.
What are the potential risks associated with a long-term, sole-source contract for essential fuel supplies?
The primary risks include potential overpayment due to lack of competition, reduced incentive for the contractor to innovate or improve efficiency, and vulnerability to supply chain disruptions if the sole source faces issues. It also limits the government's ability to leverage market competition for better pricing or terms over the contract duration.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing › Petroleum Refineries
Product/Service Code: FUELS, LUBRICANTS, OILS, WAXES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT (K)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 3225 GALLOWS ROAD - RM 5D2, FAIRFAX, VA, 11
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: SP060005D0508
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-11-08
Current End Date: 2010-06-30
Potential End Date: 2010-06-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2009-10-30
More Contracts from Exxon Mobil Corporation
- Turbine Fuel, JP8 — $718.4M (Department of Defense)
- Turbine Fuel, JP8 — $354.6M (Department of Defense)
- Award Under RMW SP060012R0161 for F76 (114,205,000 USG) and JAA (14,250,000 USG) — $325.4M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $212.2M (Department of Defense)
- Inland East Gulf Contract for Turbine Fuel, Aviation Jp8/Jaa — $186.2M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)