Agriculture Department's $23.8M consulting contract awarded to YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC. for administrative management services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $23,814,085 ($23.8M)

Contractor: Your Recruiting Company, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Agriculture

Start Date: 2013-09-19

End Date: 2017-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,472 days

Daily Burn Rate: $16.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20374

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Agriculture obligated $23.8 million to YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC. for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF Key points: 1. The contract's value of $23.8 million over approximately 4 years suggests a significant investment in administrative management and general management consulting. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, this contract indicates a market where multiple vendors could potentially offer these services. 3. The fixed-price contract type aims to control costs by establishing a set price for the services rendered. 4. The duration of the contract (1472 days) implies a need for sustained support in administrative functions. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541611 points to a focus on management consulting services. 6. The contract was awarded to a single vendor, YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC., which warrants a review of performance and pricing. 7. The contract's completion in 2017 means current market benchmarks may differ significantly.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $23.8 million for administrative management and general management consulting services over nearly four years is substantial. Without specific deliverables or performance metrics, a direct value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, comparing this to similar large-scale consulting engagements within federal agencies can provide context. The fixed-price nature of the contract suggests an attempt to manage cost certainty, but the overall value depends heavily on the quality and impact of the services provided by YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that the solicitation was made available to all responsible sources, and any responsible source was permitted to submit a bid. This method is generally preferred for maximizing competition and potentially achieving better pricing. The number of bidders is not specified, but the open competition suggests a healthy level of interest from the market for these types of administrative management services.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it typically drives down prices through market forces and encourages a wider range of innovative solutions, potentially leading to more efficient service delivery.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries of this contract are likely the various departments and agencies within the Department of Agriculture that received administrative management and general management consulting services. The services delivered aimed to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of administrative operations within the Farm Service Agency. The geographic impact is centered in the District of Columbia, where the contract was awarded and likely performed. The contract supported the workforce by engaging a private sector entity to provide specialized consulting expertise, potentially freeing up government personnel for core mission activities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to gauge the true impact and value derived from the $23.8 million expenditure.
The contract ended in 2017, so current market rates and service provider capabilities may have evolved, making direct comparisons challenging.
Without knowing the number of bidders, it's hard to definitively assess the intensity of competition and its potential impact on pricing.
The broad nature of 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' could encompass a wide range of activities, making specific outcome assessment difficult without further detail.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust market engagement process.
The use of a firm fixed-price contract type indicates a clear understanding and agreement on the total cost of services.
The contract duration of over 1400 days suggests a sustained need and potentially successful long-term engagement.
The contract was awarded to a single entity, implying that YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC. met all the requirements and was selected as the best value.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically focusing on management consulting. The market for these services is vast and highly competitive, with numerous firms offering expertise in administrative efficiency, organizational structure, and operational improvements. Federal agencies frequently procure these services to augment internal capabilities, implement new management strategies, or address specific operational challenges. Benchmarking this contract's value would require comparing it against similar engagements for administrative consulting services within government, considering the scope, duration, and specific expertise required.

Small Business Impact

The contract details indicate that small business participation was not a primary focus, as the contract was awarded to YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC. without specific mention of small business set-asides or subcontracting goals. The 'sb' field is false, suggesting no explicit requirement for small business involvement. This means that opportunities for small businesses to participate in this specific contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors, were likely limited or non-existent.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would have been managed by the Department of Agriculture's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are typically embedded within the contract terms, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, which record award details. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract emerged during its performance or after its completion.

Related Government Programs

Management and Consulting Services
Administrative Support Services
General Management Consulting Services
Professional Services Contracts
Federal IT Consulting

Risk Flags

Contract completed in 2017, limiting direct comparison to current market conditions.
Lack of specific performance metrics in summary data hinders value assessment.
No information on the number of bidders in the full and open competition.
Small business participation not explicitly detailed.
Specific deliverables and outcomes not outlined in summary data.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Agriculture awarded $23.8 million to YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC.. IGF::OT::IGF

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Agriculture (Farm Service Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $23.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2013-09-19. End: 2017-09-30.

What specific administrative management and general management consulting services were provided under this contract?

The contract, NAICS code 541611, broadly covers 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services.' While the specific deliverables are not detailed in the provided data, such services typically include areas like organizational structure analysis, process improvement, strategic planning, operational efficiency assessments, human capital management consulting, and policy development support. The Farm Service Agency likely engaged YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC. to address specific challenges or opportunities related to its administrative functions, aiming to enhance effectiveness, reduce costs, or implement new management practices. A deeper dive into the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) would be necessary to ascertain the precise services rendered.

How does the $23.8 million contract value compare to similar administrative consulting contracts awarded by the Department of Agriculture or other federal agencies?

Comparing the $23.8 million value requires context regarding the contract's duration (1472 days, approximately 4 years) and the specific scope of services. Large federal consulting contracts can range widely, from a few million to hundreds of millions of dollars. For administrative and management consulting, a contract of this magnitude over four years suggests a significant, ongoing need for support. To benchmark effectively, one would need to identify comparable contracts awarded around the same period (2013-2017) by agencies of similar size and complexity, focusing on contracts with similar NAICS codes and objectives. Without access to the detailed Statement of Work and performance reports, a precise comparison is difficult, but the amount indicates a substantial investment in external expertise for administrative functions.

What was the track record of YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC. with federal contracts prior to and during this award?

Information on the track record of YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC. prior to and during this specific $23.8 million contract is not provided in the summary data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing their contract history in the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or similar databases. This would include examining the number and value of previous awards, the agencies they served, the types of services rendered, and any performance ratings or past performance evaluations. Understanding their history would help gauge their experience and reliability in delivering administrative management and general management consulting services to the federal government.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or success metrics for this contract?

The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or success metrics established for this contract. Typically, for administrative management and general management consulting services, KPIs would be defined in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) and could include metrics related to process efficiency improvements (e.g., reduced cycle times, cost savings achieved), successful implementation of new management systems or policies, stakeholder satisfaction (e.g., through surveys), adherence to project timelines, and quality of deliverables. Without these specific metrics, it is challenging to objectively evaluate the contract's success and the value delivered by YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC.

Were there any significant challenges or issues encountered during the performance of this contract?

The provided summary data does not contain information regarding any significant challenges or issues encountered during the performance of this contract. Federal contracts, especially those of this magnitude and duration, can face various challenges such as scope creep, changes in agency priorities, contractor performance issues, or unforeseen market shifts. To identify such issues, one would need to consult contract performance reports, agency reviews, or any available Inspector General reports related to this specific award. The absence of readily available negative information does not guarantee a flawless execution, but it suggests no major, publicly documented disruptions.

How did the firm fixed-price (FFP) contract type influence the cost and delivery of services compared to other contract types?

The Firm Fixed-Price (FFP) contract type, used for this $23.8 million award, establishes a set price for the defined scope of work, placing the risk of cost overruns primarily on the contractor (YOUR RECRUITING COMPANY, INC.). This contract type is advantageous for the government when the scope of work is well-defined and stable, as it provides cost certainty and incentivizes the contractor to control costs efficiently. For administrative management and general management consulting services, an FFP contract encourages the contractor to deliver the agreed-upon services within budget. However, if the scope changes significantly, contract modifications and price adjustments may be necessary, potentially negating some of the initial cost certainty. Compared to cost-reimbursement contracts, FFP offers less flexibility but greater price predictability for the government.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3877 FAIRFAX RIDGE RD STE 300C, FAIRFAX, VA, 22030

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $23,814,085

Exercised Options: $23,814,085

Current Obligation: $23,814,085

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: AG3151C130024

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline