FEDTEC LLC Awarded $3.6M for Senior Developer Support to Smart Re-engineering Effort

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,628,574 ($3.6M)

Contractor: Fedtec LLC

Awarding Agency: Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency

Start Date: 2021-09-30

End Date: 2025-09-29

Contract Duration: 1,460 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.5K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: IT

Official Description: SENIOR DEVELOPERS IN SUPPORT OF SMART RE-ENGINEERING EFFORT.

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20002

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency obligated $3.6 million to FEDTEC LLC for work described as: SENIOR DEVELOPERS IN SUPPORT OF SMART RE-ENGINEERING EFFORT. Key points: 1. Contract awarded for IT systems design and development services. 2. Sole-source award indicates potential limitations in market competition. 3. Long contract duration of 4 years suggests a significant, ongoing need. 4. Focus on re-engineering implies modernization of existing systems. 5. Geographic location in Washington D.C. may point to agency-specific needs.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $3.6 million over four years for senior developer support appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized IT services. However, without specific details on the number of developers, their skill sets, and the complexity of the 'smart re-engineering effort,' a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. Benchmarking against similar sole-source contracts for senior developer support in the federal space would be necessary for a more definitive evaluation. The purchase order award type might suggest a less formal pricing structure compared to a fully competed contract.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed under the Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), indicating it was likely awarded on a sole-source basis. The absence of a competitive bidding process means that the agency did not explore the full range of available vendors, which could potentially lead to higher costs or less optimal solutions. The rationale for a sole-source award would need to be examined to understand if it was justified by unique capabilities or urgent requirements.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards limit opportunities for other businesses to compete for federal dollars and can reduce the government's ability to secure the best possible pricing through market competition.

Public Impact

The Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency (COSA) benefits from this contract through the provision of specialized IT development expertise. Services delivered include support for a 'smart re-engineering effort,' likely aimed at improving the agency's IT systems. The geographic impact is concentrated in the District of Columbia, where COSA is headquartered. Workforce implications involve the engagement of senior developers, potentially augmenting the agency's internal IT capabilities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Sole-source award limits competitive pricing and vendor choice.
Lack of competition may reduce pressure on contractor to innovate or optimize performance.
Long-term contract duration could lead to vendor lock-in if not managed carefully.

Positive Signals

Focus on re-engineering suggests a commitment to modernizing critical IT infrastructure.
Dedicated senior developer support indicates a focus on high-level technical expertise.
Purchase order award may allow for flexibility in tasking and adjustments.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Computer Systems Design Services sector (NAICS 541512), a critical area for federal IT modernization. The market for these services is robust, with numerous companies offering specialized development and re-engineering capabilities. Federal spending in this sector is substantial, driven by the continuous need to update legacy systems, enhance cybersecurity, and implement new digital services. This contract represents a specific investment by the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency to address its unique IT infrastructure needs.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to FEDTEC LLC, and there is no indication of a small business set-aside (SB: false) or subcontracting requirements (SS: false). This suggests that the primary award was not targeted towards small businesses, and opportunities for small business participation through subcontracting may be limited unless initiated by the prime contractor. Further investigation into FEDTEC LLC's size and subcontracting plans would be needed to fully assess the impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

As a purchase order, oversight mechanisms may differ from those of larger, more formally structured contracts. The Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency is responsible for monitoring performance and ensuring compliance with the terms of the award. Transparency regarding the specific objectives and progress of the 'smart re-engineering effort' would be beneficial for public accountability. The Inspector General's office for the Department of Justice (which oversees COSA) would likely have jurisdiction for audits and investigations if any issues arise.

Related Government Programs

IT Modernization Programs
Software Development Services
Digital Transformation Initiatives
Case Management System Enhancements

Risk Flags

Sole-source award raises concerns about competition and potential overpricing.
Lack of publicly available details on the 'smart re-engineering effort' limits transparency.
Contract duration of 4 years requires careful performance monitoring to ensure continued value.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency awarded $3.6 million to FEDTEC LLC. SENIOR DEVELOPERS IN SUPPORT OF SMART RE-ENGINEERING EFFORT.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is FEDTEC LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency (Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-09-30. End: 2025-09-29.

What is the specific nature of the 'smart re-engineering effort' this contract supports, and what are its key objectives?

The 'smart re-engineering effort' likely refers to a project aimed at modernizing or significantly overhauling existing IT systems within the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency (COSA). This could involve updating legacy software, improving database management, enhancing user interfaces, integrating new functionalities, or migrating systems to cloud-based infrastructure. Key objectives would typically include increasing system efficiency, improving data accuracy and accessibility, strengthening cybersecurity, reducing operational costs, and ensuring compliance with evolving technological standards and regulatory requirements. Without specific documentation from COSA, the precise scope and goals remain generalized, but the term 're-engineering' implies a fundamental redesign rather than incremental updates.

What is FEDTEC LLC's track record with federal contracts, particularly in IT systems design and development?

FEDTEC LLC has been awarded this $3.6 million purchase order for senior developer support. A review of federal procurement databases would be necessary to ascertain FEDTEC LLC's broader contract history. This would include examining the number and value of previous awards, the agencies they have served, and the types of services rendered. Information on past performance, including any reported issues or successes, would provide crucial context for assessing their capability to successfully execute this re-engineering effort. Understanding their experience with similar large-scale IT projects is key to evaluating their suitability for this sole-source award.

How does the pricing structure of this sole-source contract compare to market rates for similar senior developer services?

Assessing the pricing structure requires detailed information on the labor categories, hourly rates, and estimated hours included in the $3.6 million award. Since this is a sole-source contract, direct comparison to competitively bid contracts is difficult. However, market rates for senior developers with specialized skills in areas relevant to IT re-engineering (e.g., cloud architecture, specific programming languages, cybersecurity) can be benchmarked against industry surveys and government-published salary data. If the rates appear significantly higher than market averages or comparable federal contracts, it could indicate a potential lack of value for money due to the absence of competition. The 'labor hours' (pt) contract type suggests payment based on actual hours worked, making the total cost dependent on effort expended.

What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source award for a critical IT re-engineering effort?

The primary risk of a sole-source award is the lack of competition, which can lead to inflated prices, reduced incentive for innovation, and potentially suboptimal solutions. For a critical IT re-engineering effort, this could mean the agency might not get the most cost-effective or technologically advanced solution available. There's also a risk of vendor lock-in, where the agency becomes heavily reliant on FEDTEC LLC, making future transitions or renegotiations more difficult. Furthermore, without a competitive process, there's less assurance that FEDTEC LLC possesses unique capabilities that truly justify the sole-source designation, raising questions about the procurement process itself.

What is the historical spending pattern of the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency on IT systems design and development services?

To understand the historical spending patterns, one would need to analyze COSA's procurement data over several fiscal years. This analysis should focus on the frequency and value of contracts awarded for IT systems design, development, maintenance, and re-engineering. Comparing the $3.6 million award to previous investments in similar services would reveal whether this represents a significant increase, a continuation of existing spending levels, or a new strategic initiative. Understanding past trends can help contextualize the current contract's scale and importance within COSA's overall IT budget and modernization strategy.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › IT AND TELECOM - APLLICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Solicitation ID: 9594CS21Q0038

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 8260 GREENSBORO DR STE 150, MCLEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,628,574

Exercised Options: $3,628,574

Current Obligation: $3,628,574

Actual Outlays: $3,628,574

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline