NASA awards CACI $190.9M for Application and Platform Services, a 2-year contract
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $190,900,783 ($190.9M)
Contractor: CACI, Inc. - Federal
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2024-07-03
End Date: 2026-06-30
Contract Duration: 727 days
Daily Burn Rate: $262.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: IT
Official Description: NASA CONSOLIDATED APPLICATION AND PLATFORM SERVICES (NCAPS)
Place of Performance
Location: CHANTILLY, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20151
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $190.9 million to CACI, INC. - FEDERAL for work described as: NASA CONSOLIDATED APPLICATION AND PLATFORM SERVICES (NCAPS) Key points: 1. Contract value of $190.9M over two years suggests a significant investment in IT infrastructure. 2. The award was made under full and open competition, indicating a robust bidding process. 3. The contract type is a Definitive Contract, typically used for straightforward service delivery. 4. The fixed-price nature of the contract shifts performance risk to the contractor. 5. CACI, Inc. - Federal is the sole awardee, suggesting they were the most competitive bidder. 6. The contract duration of 727 days (approx. 2 years) provides a stable period for service delivery. 7. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541512 points to computer systems design services.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $190.9M over approximately two years for computer systems design services appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar large-scale IT service contracts for federal agencies suggests this falls within expected ranges for comprehensive application and platform support. The firm-fixed-price structure implies that the contractor has committed to delivering the specified services within the agreed budget, which is a positive indicator for cost control.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 5 bids indicates a healthy level of interest and competition for this significant IT services contract. This competitive environment is crucial for ensuring NASA receives the best value and pricing for its requirements.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process generally leads to more competitive pricing, which benefits taxpayers by ensuring federal dollars are spent efficiently and effectively.
Public Impact
NASA personnel will benefit from improved application and platform services, enhancing operational efficiency. The contract supports the development, integration, and maintenance of critical IT systems for NASA's missions. The geographic impact is primarily within Virginia, where CACI, Inc. - Federal is located, but the services support NASA's nationwide operations. The contract supports skilled IT professionals within CACI, Inc. - Federal, contributing to the federal IT workforce.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for vendor lock-in if services become highly integrated and difficult to transition.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical IT infrastructure could pose risks if performance falters.
- Ensuring continued innovation and adaptation to evolving technological landscapes within the contract's scope.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting strong market validation of CACI's capabilities.
- Firm-fixed-price contract structure incentivizes contractor efficiency and cost management.
- Long-term contract provides stability for NASA's IT service delivery and planning.
- CACI, Inc. - Federal has a significant presence and experience in government contracting.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Computer Systems Design Services sector, a critical component of the broader IT services industry. The federal government is a major consumer of these services, investing heavily in maintaining and modernizing its digital infrastructure. The market for such services is competitive, with numerous large and small businesses vying for government contracts. NASA's spending in this area is consistent with its need for robust and reliable IT support to manage complex scientific and exploratory missions.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of specific small business subcontracting requirements in the provided data. The award to a large prime contractor like CACI, Inc. - Federal suggests that the primary focus was on the prime contractor's capabilities rather than small business participation goals. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities exist for small businesses within this award.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by NASA's contracting officers and program managers, who are responsible for ensuring performance and compliance. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, which obligates CACI to deliver services within the agreed budget. Transparency is facilitated through federal contract databases, though detailed performance metrics may not be publicly disclosed. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- NASA IT Infrastructure Support Contracts
- Federal Cloud Computing Services
- Enterprise Application Development Services
- IT Systems Integration Services
- NASA Software Development and Maintenance
Risk Flags
- Potential for vendor lock-in
- Reliance on single contractor for critical IT services
- Need for continuous adaptation to technological advancements
Tags
it-services, nasa, caci-inc-federal, definitive-contract, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, computer-systems-design-services, virginia, large-contract, application-services, platform-services
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $190.9 million to CACI, INC. - FEDERAL. NASA CONSOLIDATED APPLICATION AND PLATFORM SERVICES (NCAPS)
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CACI, INC. - FEDERAL.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $190.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-07-03. End: 2026-06-30.
What is CACI, Inc. - Federal's track record with NASA on similar IT services contracts?
CACI, Inc. - Federal has a substantial history of contracting with NASA and other federal agencies for a wide range of IT services. Their past performance with NASA likely includes support for various IT infrastructure, application development, and systems integration projects. Analyzing CACI's specific performance history on prior NASA contracts, including any past performance evaluations, award fees, or documented issues, would provide a clearer picture of their reliability and capability for this NCAPS contract. This historical data is crucial for assessing the risk associated with their current award and predicting their likelihood of successful execution.
How does the $190.9M contract value compare to NASA's historical spending on application and platform services?
The $190.9 million awarded to CACI, Inc. - Federal for the NCAPS contract represents a significant investment over its approximately two-year duration. To benchmark this value, one would compare it against NASA's historical spending trends for similar IT services, such as enterprise application development, platform management, and IT infrastructure support. Analyzing annual IT budgets and specific contract awards from previous fiscal years would reveal whether this award is an increase, decrease, or consistent with past spending patterns. Factors like inflation, evolving technological needs, and the scope of services defined in the NCAPS contract would influence this comparison, providing context for the current investment's scale.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how will they be measured?
While specific KPIs are not detailed in the provided data, typical performance indicators for a contract like NASA's Consolidated Application and Platform Services (NCAPS) would likely include metrics related to system uptime and availability, response times for critical applications, successful deployment of new features or updates, adherence to security protocols, and user satisfaction. Measurement methods would involve regular reporting from CACI, system monitoring tools, and potentially user feedback surveys. NASA's program office would be responsible for tracking these KPIs against established targets and taking corrective action if performance falls short, ensuring the contractor meets the agreed-upon service levels.
What is the potential impact of this contract on NASA's ability to achieve its mission objectives?
This contract is crucial for NASA's mission objectives as it directly supports the underlying IT infrastructure and applications that enable scientific research, space exploration, and aeronautics development. Reliable and efficient application and platform services are essential for data management, communication, collaboration among scientists and engineers, and the operation of mission-critical systems. By ensuring these services are robust and well-maintained, the NCAPS contract helps to minimize IT-related disruptions, enhance productivity, and provide the technological foundation necessary for NASA to pursue its ambitious goals in space and beyond.
Are there any identified risks associated with CACI, Inc. - Federal's performance on this contract?
Potential risks associated with CACI, Inc. - Federal's performance on this contract could include challenges in managing the complexity of NASA's diverse application portfolio, ensuring seamless integration between different platforms, and adapting to rapidly evolving technological requirements. There's also a general risk inherent in any large IT contract concerning potential cost overruns (though mitigated by fixed-price), schedule delays, or performance shortfalls if not managed effectively. NASA's oversight and CACI's internal project management practices will be key to mitigating these risks. The firm-fixed-price nature shifts some financial risk to the contractor, but performance risk remains.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › IT AND TELECOM - IT MANAGEMENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: 80TECH23R0002
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: CACI International Inc
Address: 14370 NEWBROOK DR, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $2,022,827,665
Exercised Options: $465,287,537
Current Obligation: $190,900,783
Actual Outlays: $144,291,136
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 78
Total Subaward Amount: $707,777,057
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-07-03
Current End Date: 2026-06-30
Potential End Date: 2026-06-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-14
More Contracts from CACI, Inc. - Federal
- Award Made to CACI, Inc.-Federal for Jida Fs/De Task Order, in the Amount NOT to Exceed $1,773,158,264.00. Igf::cl::igf — $960.0M (General Services Administration)
- Federal Contract — $926.2M (General Services Administration)
- Beagle Task Order Award — $824.3M (General Services Administration)
- CDM Defend Group a Bridge Task Order — $713.4M (General Services Administration)
- Dynamic and Evolving Federal Enterprise Network Defense Group a Defend a Option Exercise and Transfer From Piid 47qfca18f0050 — $708.3M (General Services Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →