NASA awards $3.9M contract for Stennis Space Center protective services to Chenega Global Protection
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $3,888,699 ($3.9M)
Contractor: Chenega Global Protection, LLC
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2025-10-01
End Date: 2026-09-30
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $10.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: STENNIS SPACE CENTER (SSC) PROTECTIVE SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: STENNIS SPACE CENTER, HANCOCK County, MISSISSIPPI, 39529
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $3.9 million to CHENEGA GLOBAL PROTECTION, LLC for work described as: STENNIS SPACE CENTER (SSC) PROTECTIVE SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded for essential security services at a major NASA facility. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a broad search for qualified bidders. 3. The contract duration is one year, with a firm-fixed-price structure. 4. The award amount is relatively modest for federal security contracts of this nature. 5. Performance is expected to be high given the critical nature of the facility. 6. The contractor has experience in providing similar protective services.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of approximately $3.9 million for a one-year period for protective services at a significant federal facility like Stennis Space Center appears reasonable. Benchmarking against similar contracts for security guard and patrol services at other federal installations suggests this pricing is within expected ranges. The firm-fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government, although it places the risk of cost overruns on the contractor. Without detailed performance metrics or specific service level agreements, a definitive value-for-money assessment is challenging, but the initial indicators are positive.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating that NASA sought proposals from all responsible sources. While the specific number of bidders is not provided, the 'full and open' designation implies a competitive process designed to solicit a range of offers. This approach generally leads to better price discovery and ensures that the government receives competitive pricing by considering a wide pool of potential contractors.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it promotes a competitive environment, which typically drives down costs and encourages innovation among service providers, ultimately leading to better value for public funds.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are NASA and the personnel and assets at the Stennis Space Center, ensuring a secure operational environment. The contract delivers essential security guard and patrol services, including access control, surveillance, and emergency response. The geographic impact is localized to the Stennis Space Center in Mississippi. The contract supports jobs within the private security sector, contributing to the local and national workforce.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for contractor performance issues if staffing levels or training are inadequate.
- Risk of security breaches if surveillance or response protocols are not strictly adhered to.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical security functions.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost predictability for the government.
- Full and open competition suggests a robust selection process.
- Contract duration allows for stable service provision over the performance period.
Sector Analysis
The protective services sector within the federal government is a significant market, encompassing a wide range of security needs for government facilities and operations. This contract falls within the broader category of facility support services, which are consistently high-spending areas for agencies like NASA. The market is characterized by numerous established providers, ranging from large corporations to smaller specialized firms, all competing for government contracts. The annual spending on security services across the federal government runs into billions of dollars, making this specific award a small but vital component of overall federal security infrastructure.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from a small business set-aside. The competition was open, meaning both large and small businesses could have bid, but the award was not specifically targeted to encourage small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will primarily be managed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) contracting officer and potentially through designated contracting officer representatives (CORs). These individuals are responsible for monitoring contractor performance, ensuring compliance with contract terms, and approving payments. Transparency is facilitated through public contract databases where award details are recorded. While specific Inspector General (IG) jurisdiction for this particular contract isn't detailed, the NASA OIG generally has oversight over agency contracts to detect and prevent fraud, waste, and abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Protective Service Contracts
- NASA Facility Support Services
- Security Guard Services
- Department of Homeland Security Contracts
- General Services Administration Schedules
Risk Flags
- Potential for performance issues if contractor fails to meet staffing or training requirements.
- Risk of security breaches due to unforeseen threats or protocol failures.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical security functions.
Tags
nasa, stennis-space-center, protective-services, security-guards, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, mississippi, national-aeronautics-and-space-administration, chenega-global-protection, delivery-order, facility-security
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $3.9 million to CHENEGA GLOBAL PROTECTION, LLC. STENNIS SPACE CENTER (SSC) PROTECTIVE SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CHENEGA GLOBAL PROTECTION, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $3.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-10-01. End: 2026-09-30.
What is the track record of Chenega Global Protection, LLC in providing federal protective services?
Chenega Global Protection, LLC, as part of the larger Chenega Corporation, has a substantial track record in providing a wide array of services to the federal government, including security, logistics, and facilities management. They have held numerous contracts across various agencies, such as the Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, and other civilian agencies. Their experience often includes providing armed and unarmed security guards, access control, physical security, and emergency response services. While specific performance metrics for individual contracts are not publicly detailed in this summary, their continued success in winning federal contracts suggests a generally positive performance history and capability to meet government requirements. It is advisable to review specific past performance evaluations and contract award histories for a more granular understanding of their capabilities and reliability.
How does the awarded amount compare to similar federal security contracts?
The awarded amount of approximately $3.9 million for a one-year contract for security guard and patrol services at Stennis Space Center is generally in line with the market rates for similar services at federal installations. The cost per day for security services can vary significantly based on factors like the number of guards required, their qualifications (e.g., armed vs. unarmed), the level of technology employed, and the specific security risks associated with the facility. However, for a facility of NASA's caliber, this figure represents a moderate investment. Larger, more complex federal sites or those with higher security threat levels might see contracts valued significantly higher, while smaller or less critical facilities might have contracts at a lower price point. This award suggests a competitive pricing strategy was likely employed during the full and open competition.
What are the primary risks associated with this type of contract?
The primary risks associated with this protective services contract include potential contractor performance failures, such as inadequate staffing, insufficient training, or failure to respond effectively to security incidents. There's also a risk of security breaches if protocols are not strictly followed or if unforeseen threats emerge. Another risk is related to cost management for the contractor, although the firm-fixed-price structure shifts this risk primarily to them. For the government, risks include potential disruptions to services if the contractor faces financial difficulties or operational challenges, and the potential for security lapses if oversight is not rigorous. Ensuring robust performance monitoring and clear communication channels are crucial to mitigating these risks.
What is the historical spending pattern for protective services at Stennis Space Center?
Historical spending data for protective services specifically at Stennis Space Center would provide valuable context for this $3.9 million award. Without direct access to historical spending records for this specific location and service category, it's difficult to provide precise figures. However, federal agencies like NASA typically maintain consistent security needs for their facilities. It is reasonable to assume that Stennis Space Center has had ongoing requirements for protective services over the years, likely awarded through similar competitive processes. Annual spending could fluctuate based on evolving security requirements, budget allocations, and contract durations. A review of past awards for security services at SSC would reveal trends in contract values, durations, and the incumbent contractors, allowing for a comparison to the current award.
How does the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' designation impact the bidding process?
The designation 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' means that while the competition was open to all responsible sources, there might have been prior specific circumstances or justifications that led to excluding certain sources from consideration, or perhaps it refers to a specific phase of a larger procurement. In the context of federal contracting, 'full and open competition' generally implies that all qualified businesses, regardless of size or type, were encouraged to submit proposals. The 'after exclusion of sources' part can sometimes indicate a specific procedural step or a clarification of the competition type. However, the core implication is that the government sought the widest possible range of offers to ensure the best value. This process aims to prevent favoritism and ensure fair market pricing by allowing any capable vendor to compete.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Guards and Patrol Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 14420 ALBEMARLE POINT PL STE 100, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $6,774,421
Exercised Options: $6,774,421
Current Obligation: $3,888,699
Actual Outlays: $2,323,149
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 80KSC022DA001
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-10-01
Current End Date: 2026-09-30
Potential End Date: 2026-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-19
More Contracts from Chenega Global Protection, LLC
- Armed Security Guards for Atlanta&ft. Collins — $110.1M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- ATL FT Collins Guards Bridge — $33.3M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Base Award for Security and Access Control Services in Support of Usag-Ka — $26.3M (Department of Defense)
- Services — $23.9M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Nasa Protective Services Contract - South Region (npsc-Sr) KSC Task Order for Baseline and Pre-Priced Items — $16.7M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →