NASA Renews Schneider Electric Software Support for $1.8M, Extending Contract to March 2027
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $18,065 ($18.1K)
Contractor: Crescent Electric Supply CO
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2026-04-07
End Date: 2027-03-04
Contract Duration: 331 days
Daily Burn Rate: $55/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: IT
Official Description: RE-OB OF AWARD 80NSSC26P0115 SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SOFTWARE SUPPORT RENEWAL (POP: 3/4/2026-3/4/2027)
Place of Performance
Location: CLEVELAND, CUYAHOGA County, OHIO, 44125
State: Ohio Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $18,065 to CRESCENT ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO for work described as: RE-OB OF AWARD 80NSSC26P0115 SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SOFTWARE SUPPORT RENEWAL (POP: 3/4/2026-3/4/2027) Key points: 1. Contract value of $1.8M for one year of software support. 2. Renewal with Schneider Electric, a known vendor. 3. Potential risk of vendor lock-in and limited competition. 4. Spending falls under 'Other Computer Related Services' (NAICS 541519).
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The $1.8M price for one year of software support needs comparison against similar NASA or agency software support contracts. Without benchmarks, it's difficult to assess if this price is competitive.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
This contract was not competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), suggesting it may have been a limited competition or sole-source action. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may be paying a premium due to the lack of competitive bidding for this software support renewal.
Public Impact
NASA continues to rely on specific software, impacting operational efficiency. The renewal ensures continued access to critical software tools for agency operations. Lack of competition raises concerns about long-term cost-effectiveness for taxpayers.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 55 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition
- Potential for price escalation
- Vendor lock-in
Positive Signals
- Ensures continuity of essential software services
- Supports NASA's operational needs
Sector Analysis
Spending in 'Other Computer Related Services' is common across government agencies for software, IT support, and related services. Benchmarks vary widely based on the specific services and vendor.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not awarded to a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were considered or could have provided similar services.
Oversight & Accountability
The purchase order details suggest a renewal process. Oversight should focus on ensuring the justification for limited competition is robust and that future opportunities for competition are explored.
Related Government Programs
- Other Computer Related Services
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of competition
- Potential overpayment
- Vendor lock-in
- Limited transparency on software criticality
Tags
other-computer-related-services, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, oh, purchase-order, under-100k
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $18,065 to CRESCENT ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. RE-OB OF AWARD 80NSSC26P0115 SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SOFTWARE SUPPORT RENEWAL (POP: 3/4/2026-3/4/2027)
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CRESCENT ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $18,065.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2026-04-07. End: 2027-03-04.
What is the specific software being supported and its criticality to NASA's mission?
The specific software is not detailed in the provided data. Understanding the software's function and its essential role in NASA's operations is crucial for justifying the expenditure and assessing the impact of limited competition. Critical software may warrant less aggressive competition if unique expertise is required, but this needs clear documentation.
What was the justification for not competing this award under SAP?
The justification for not competing under SAP is not provided. Typically, this could be due to the value exceeding SAP thresholds, a sole-source requirement, or specific contract vehicle limitations. A thorough review of the justification is necessary to understand if competitive options were genuinely unavailable or overlooked.
Are there alternative software solutions or vendors that could meet NASA's needs in the future?
The provided data does not offer insight into alternative solutions. Proactive market research is essential to identify potential competitors or alternative software that could fulfill NASA's requirements in the future. This would help mitigate vendor lock-in and potentially drive down costs through future competition.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Other Computer Related Services
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › IT AND TELECOM - APLLICATIONS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP
Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Crescent Electric Supply Company
Address: 5520 CLOVERLEAF PKWY, CLEVELAND, OH, 44125
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $18,065
Exercised Options: $18,065
Current Obligation: $18,065
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Timeline
Start Date: 2026-04-07
Current End Date: 2027-03-04
Potential End Date: 2027-03-04 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-07
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →