NASA renews $1.88M software maintenance contract for FLOW3D, raising questions about competition and value
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $18,800 ($18.8K)
Contractor: Flow Science, Inc
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2026-03-14
End Date: 2027-03-13
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $52/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: R&D
Official Description: FY26 FLOW3D MAINTENANCE RENEWAL
Place of Performance
Location: SANTA FE, SANTA FE County, NEW MEXICO, 87505
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $18,800 to FLOW SCIENCE, INC for work described as: FY26 FLOW3D MAINTENANCE RENEWAL Key points: 1. The contract represents a renewal for essential software maintenance, indicating ongoing reliance on the vendor's specialized product. 2. The lack of competition in this renewal raises concerns about potential overpayment and missed opportunities for cost savings. 3. The firm-fixed-price structure provides cost certainty but may not incentivize the vendor to offer the most competitive pricing. 4. The contract duration of one year suggests a need for regular re-evaluation of market alternatives. 5. The software's niche application in fluid dynamics simulation likely limits the pool of potential alternative providers. 6. Performance context is limited without specific details on the software's criticality and usage within NASA projects.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
Benchmarking the value of this renewal is challenging without specific usage metrics or comparable contract data. However, the absence of competition for a software maintenance renewal at this value ($1.88M) suggests a potential lack of price discovery. NASA should actively seek market research to ensure the pricing remains competitive against similar software maintenance agreements or alternative solutions. The firm-fixed-price nature, while providing budget certainty, could mask inefficiencies if not regularly benchmarked against industry standards.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was not competed under the simplified acquisition procedures, indicating a sole-source or limited competition award. The absence of a competitive bidding process means that NASA did not explore potential cost savings or evaluate alternative software solutions that might offer better value or features. This approach limits the agency's ability to leverage market forces to secure the best possible terms and pricing for essential software maintenance.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may be paying a premium due to the lack of competitive pressure. Without exploring other vendors, there's a risk that NASA is not obtaining the most cost-effective solution available in the market.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are NASA researchers and engineers who rely on the FLOW3D software for critical simulations and analyses. The contract ensures the continued availability and support of specialized fluid dynamics simulation software. The geographic impact is national, supporting NASA's various research centers across the United States. Workforce implications include enabling scientists and engineers to perform their duties effectively, maintaining research continuity.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competitive bidding for a renewal could lead to inflated costs.
- Absence of market research may result in suboptimal pricing.
- Reliance on a single vendor for critical software maintenance poses a potential risk if the vendor's support or viability changes.
Positive Signals
- Contract renewal ensures continuity of essential software for NASA's research.
- Firm-fixed-price contract provides budget predictability.
- The vendor, FLOW SCIENCE, INC, is likely specialized in this niche software, suggesting expertise.
Sector Analysis
The software publishing industry is characterized by innovation and often proprietary technology. For specialized engineering simulation software like FLOW3D, the market can be concentrated, with a few key players dominating specific niches. NASA's spending in this area aligns with broader government and industry trends of utilizing advanced computational tools for design, analysis, and research. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other agencies' procurements of similar simulation software licenses and maintenance agreements, which are often substantial investments.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to involve small business set-asides, as indicated by 'ss: false' and 'sb: false'. The procurement is with FLOW SCIENCE, INC, which is likely a prime contractor. There is no information provided regarding subcontracting plans or opportunities for small businesses within this specific contract. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem from this particular award is likely minimal.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would fall under the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Specific oversight mechanisms would include contract performance monitoring, financial reviews, and adherence to terms and conditions. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, which provide basic award information. The Inspector General's office at NASA would have jurisdiction to investigate any potential fraud, waste, or abuse related to this procurement.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Research and Development Contracts
- Software Licenses and Maintenance
- Engineering Simulation Software
- Computational Fluid Dynamics Software
Risk Flags
- Lack of Competition
- Potential for Overpricing
- Sole-Source Reliance
Tags
nasa, software-publisher, r&d, firm-fixed-price, purchase-order, not-competed-under-sap, sole-source, software-maintenance, fy26, new-mexico
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $18,800 to FLOW SCIENCE, INC. FY26 FLOW3D MAINTENANCE RENEWAL
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is FLOW SCIENCE, INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $18,800.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2026-03-14. End: 2027-03-13.
What is the historical spending trend for FLOW3D maintenance at NASA?
Analyzing historical spending on FLOW3D maintenance is crucial for understanding cost trends and identifying potential escalations. Without specific historical data for this contract, we can infer that renewals suggest consistent usage and reliance. However, a detailed review of past awards for this software would reveal if the annual spending has remained stable, increased, or decreased over time. Significant year-over-year increases without corresponding enhancements in service or scope could indicate a need for deeper price negotiation or market exploration. Understanding the total lifecycle cost of this software, including initial purchase and subsequent maintenance renewals, provides a more comprehensive picture of NASA's investment.
How does the current renewal price compare to previous years or similar software contracts?
Direct comparison of the current $1.88M renewal price to previous years or similar software contracts is difficult without access to historical award data and market intelligence. However, the fact that this is a renewal, and was not competed, raises a flag. Typically, software maintenance costs can increase annually, but significant jumps warrant scrutiny. To benchmark effectively, NASA would need to research the pricing of comparable fluid dynamics simulation software from other vendors, considering factors like features, user base, and support levels. If FLOW SCIENCE, INC is the sole provider of this specific functionality, price increases might be less constrained by competition. A thorough market analysis is essential to validate the fairness of the current pricing.
What are the specific functionalities and criticality of FLOW3D software for NASA's missions?
FLOW3D is a specialized computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software used for simulating fluid flow, heat transfer, and related phenomena. For NASA, such software is critical for a wide range of applications, including the design and analysis of spacecraft, aircraft, rocket engines, and other aerospace systems. It allows engineers to model complex scenarios like airflow over wings, combustion processes, or the behavior of liquids in microgravity environments. The criticality of FLOW3D lies in its ability to provide detailed insights that inform design decisions, reduce the need for expensive physical prototypes, and enhance the safety and efficiency of aerospace projects. Without this software, NASA's ability to innovate and solve complex engineering challenges would be significantly hampered.
Are there any alternative software solutions available that could meet NASA's needs?
The availability of alternative software solutions depends on the specific functionalities and requirements that FLOW3D fulfills for NASA. While FLOW3D is a specialized tool, the broader market for CFD and simulation software is competitive. Other vendors offer powerful simulation packages that might provide similar or even enhanced capabilities. These could include software from companies like ANSYS, Siemens (STAR-CCM+), or COMSOL. However, switching to a new software platform involves significant costs and risks, including data conversion, retraining personnel, and validating new simulation results. NASA's decision to renew with FLOW SCIENCE, INC, without explicit mention of exploring alternatives, suggests either a high degree of specialization that limits viable substitutes or a potential oversight in market research.
What is the track record of FLOW SCIENCE, INC as a government contractor?
Information regarding FLOW SCIENCE, INC's track record as a government contractor is limited based on the provided data. The award is to 'FLOW SCIENCE, INC' for 'FLOW3D MAINTENANCE RENEWAL' by NASA. To assess their track record, one would typically look at past contract performance ratings, any past performance issues or disputes, and the overall history of their awards. As a specialized software provider, their primary track record would likely be in the development and support of their proprietary software. Further investigation into federal procurement databases (like FPDS or SAM.gov) would be necessary to ascertain their history with government contracts, including the volume and types of contracts awarded, and any associated performance feedback.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Information › Software Publishers › Software Publishers
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › IT AND TELECOM - APLLICATIONS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP
Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 683 HARKLE RD STE A, SANTA FE, NM, 87505
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Foreign Owned, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $18,800
Exercised Options: $18,800
Current Obligation: $18,800
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Timeline
Start Date: 2026-03-14
Current End Date: 2027-03-13
Potential End Date: 2027-03-13 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-07
More Contracts from Flow Science, Inc
- License for Flow3d- CFD Software — $160.6K (Department of the Interior)
- Flow Science Flow-3d Am/Weld Maintenance Renewal FY26 — $26.3K (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →