NASA's NTSS Contract Year 3 Task Order Awarded to COLSA Corp for $13.6M
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $13,572,779 ($13.6M)
Contractor: Colsa Corp
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2025-10-01
End Date: 2026-09-30
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $37.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: NASA NTSS CONTRACT YEAR 3 TASK ORDER
Place of Performance
Location: STENNIS SPACE CENTER, HANCOCK County, MISSISSIPPI, 39529
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $13.6 million to COLSA CORP for work described as: NASA NTSS CONTRACT YEAR 3 TASK ORDER Key points: 1. Value for money appears reasonable given the firm-fixed-price structure and the nature of administrative management consulting services. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, with performance context and sector positioning needing further analysis. 4. This task order represents a portion of a larger contract, indicating ongoing support for NASA's administrative needs. 5. The services fall within the administrative management and general management consulting sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The firm-fixed-price contract type for administrative management consulting services suggests a degree of price certainty. Benchmarking against similar task orders for management consulting at NASA or other federal agencies would provide a clearer picture of value. However, the absence of specific performance metrics or detailed cost breakdowns makes a definitive value assessment challenging without further data. The awarded amount of $13.6 million for a one-year period seems within a reasonable range for specialized consulting services supporting a large federal agency.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This task order was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation generally implies a competitive environment. This approach is designed to foster price discovery and ensure that the government receives competitive pricing by allowing multiple qualified contractors to vie for the work.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from full and open competition as it typically leads to lower prices and better quality services due to the pressure of multiple bidders.
Public Impact
NASA's administrative and management functions are supported, ensuring efficient operations. The services delivered likely contribute to the effective management of NASA's programs and projects. The geographic impact is primarily at NASA facilities, with potential implications for the workforce supporting these functions. This contract supports the agency's mission by providing essential management consulting expertise.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness of the consulting services.
- The specific deliverables and outcomes of this task order are not fully detailed, posing a potential risk to achieving desired results.
- Reliance on a single contractor for administrative management consulting services over multiple years could lead to vendor lock-in if not managed carefully.
Positive Signals
- The firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust and competitive selection process.
- The contractor, COLSA Corp, has a track record with federal contracts, implying some level of established capability.
Sector Analysis
The administrative management and general management consulting services sector is a broad category encompassing a wide range of support functions for government and private organizations. This contract fits within the federal IT and professional services spending landscape, where agencies procure expertise to manage complex operations, improve efficiency, and support strategic initiatives. Comparable spending in this sector often involves significant investments in areas like program management, strategic planning, and operational efficiency improvements, with contract values varying widely based on scope and duration.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a small business set-aside. The primary contractor, COLSA Corp, is not identified as a small business in this context. The impact on the small business ecosystem is indirect, as opportunities may arise through subcontracting if COLSA Corp chooses to engage small businesses for specific tasks, though this is not mandated by the contract terms.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program office within NASA responsible for the NTSS contract. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price structure, where the contractor is responsible for delivering services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is facilitated by the contract award data being publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- NASA NTSS Contract
- Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
- Federal Management Consulting Contracts
- NASA Support Services
Risk Flags
- Potential for performance gaps if deliverables are not clearly defined.
- Risk of cost overruns if scope creep occurs, despite firm-fixed-price.
- Dependence on contractor expertise may limit internal NASA development of certain skills.
Tags
nasa, administrative-management-consulting, general-management-consulting, professional-services, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, task-order, colsa-corp, mississippi, federal-agency, management-support
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $13.6 million to COLSA CORP. NASA NTSS CONTRACT YEAR 3 TASK ORDER
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is COLSA CORP.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $13.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-10-01. End: 2026-09-30.
What is COLSA Corp's track record with NASA and similar federal agencies for administrative management consulting services?
COLSA Corp has a history of performing various services for NASA and other federal agencies. While specific details on their administrative management consulting performance for NASA under the NTSS contract require deeper analysis of past performance reports and task order histories, their presence as a contractor suggests they possess the necessary qualifications and experience. A review of their contract awards and performance evaluations across different agencies would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their capabilities and reliability in delivering similar services. Their ability to secure this task order under full and open competition indicates a competitive standing among potential providers.
How does the $13.6 million value of this task order compare to similar administrative management consulting contracts awarded by NASA or other agencies?
The $13.6 million value for a one-year task order for administrative management consulting services at NASA is within a typical range for specialized support. Without specific details on the scope of work, deliverables, and the exact nature of the consulting provided, a precise comparison is difficult. However, similar task orders for program management, strategic planning, or operational efficiency consulting for large federal agencies can range from a few million to tens of millions of dollars annually, depending on the complexity and duration. The firm-fixed-price nature of this award suggests a defined scope, which aids in value assessment relative to other fixed-price contracts of similar scope.
What are the primary risks associated with this specific task order, and how are they being mitigated?
Primary risks include potential scope creep if requirements are not clearly defined, contractor performance not meeting expectations, and the possibility of the services not yielding the intended strategic or operational improvements. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust contract management by NASA, including regular performance reviews, clear communication channels, and adherence to the firm-fixed-price terms which incentivize efficient delivery. The 'full and open' competition process itself can mitigate risks by selecting a contractor with a proven track record and competitive pricing. However, ongoing monitoring of deliverables and performance is crucial throughout the contract period.
How effective has the NTSS contract vehicle been in providing administrative management and general management consulting services to NASA?
The effectiveness of the NTSS contract vehicle is best assessed by examining the aggregate performance of all task orders issued under it, not just this single task order. If NASA continues to award task orders under this vehicle, it suggests a level of satisfaction with its utility and the services procured. However, a comprehensive evaluation would require analyzing NASA's internal assessments, user feedback, and whether the services procured through NTSS have demonstrably contributed to NASA's mission objectives and operational efficiencies over time. The longevity and continued use of such contract vehicles often indicate a degree of success in meeting agency needs.
What are the historical spending patterns for administrative management and general management consulting services at NASA, and how does this award fit in?
Historical spending on administrative management and general management consulting services at NASA, like other large federal agencies, can fluctuate based on strategic priorities, budget allocations, and specific program needs. This $13.6 million task order represents a specific investment within that broader spending category for the fiscal year. To understand its place, one would need to analyze NASA's total outlays for similar services over several preceding years. This award appears to be a standard procurement for ongoing support, fitting within the typical annual expenditure for such professional services, rather than an outlier or a significant deviation from historical trends, assuming similar task orders have been awarded previously.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 6728 ODYSSEY DR NW, HUNTSVILLE, AL, 35806
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $24,654,215
Exercised Options: $24,654,215
Current Obligation: $13,572,779
Actual Outlays: $5,148,354
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 13
Total Subaward Amount: $12,579,628
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 80NSSC23DA006
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-10-01
Current End Date: 2026-09-30
Potential End Date: 2026-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-19
More Contracts from Colsa Corp
- Scat 1 Engineering, Professional, and Administrative Support Services (epass) for AIR Force Life Cycle Management Center Mobility and Training Aircraft, Presidential and Executive Airlift, and Tanker Directorates (aflcmc/Wl, WV, WK) — $431.7M (Department of Defense)
- Task Order Award — $325.7M (Department of Defense)
- C4isr Task Order — $313.2M (Department of Defense)
- 199904!2100!0337!SG60 !USA Space and Strategic DEF CDR !dasg6098c0047 !A!*!* !19990108!20020216!102067378!102067378!102067378!n!4u825!colsa Corporation !6726 Odyssey DR NW !huntsville !al!35806!37000!089!01!huntsville !madison !alabama !0001!+000002938200!n!n!000000000000!ac23!rdte/Missile and Space Systems-Adv Tech DEV !A2 !missile and Space Systems !1caa!ballistic Missile Defense SYS !8731!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!A !N!R!2!002!K!* !Z!Y!Z!* !* !n!b!*!z!*!b!a!a!*!* !*!n!a!b!n!*!*!*!*!*! — $211.8M (Department of Defense)
- THE Huntsville Operations Support Center (hosc) Contract Specifies Technical, Managerial, and Administrative Work Needed to Ensure the Availability, Integrity, and Reliability of Mission Ground System Development and Operations in Support of National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) Space Programs. This Contract Provides Single or Multi-Program Unique Facilities, Systems, and Services, Both Local and Remote to Msfc, Supporting Nasa Spacecraft, Payload, Satellite, and Propulsion Systems Operations. the Contract Provides Cross Utilization of Resources Across Programs and Seamless Operations Support for Multiple Programs — $192.7M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →