NASA awards $1.01M for NTSS Special Projects Task Order 3.8.1.4.9 SPM PRYXIS Support to COLSA CORP
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $101,415 ($101.4K)
Contractor: Colsa Corp
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2025-10-01
End Date: 2026-09-30
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $279/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: NTSS SPECIAL PROJECTS TASK ORDER 3.8.1.4.9 SPM PRYXIS SUPPORT.
Place of Performance
Location: STENNIS SPACE CENTER, HANCOCK County, MISSISSIPPI, 39529
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $101,415.12 to COLSA CORP for work described as: NTSS SPECIAL PROJECTS TASK ORDER 3.8.1.4.9 SPM PRYXIS SUPPORT. Key points: 1. Contract awarded for administrative management and general management consulting services. 2. Firm Fixed Price contract type suggests defined scope and cost control. 3. Performance period spans one year, indicating a focused project. 4. Awarded by NASA, a key agency for advanced research and development. 5. Task order structure implies it's part of a larger contract vehicle. 6. No small business set-aside, suggesting a focus on larger prime contractors.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $1.01 million for a 364-day period is moderate for consulting services. Benchmarking against similar NASA contracts for administrative and management consulting is necessary to fully assess value. The firm fixed price structure provides some cost certainty, but the specific deliverables and their market value are not detailed here. Without more context on the scope of 'SPM PRYXIS SUPPORT', a definitive value-for-money assessment is challenging.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. This approach generally fosters a competitive environment, potentially leading to better pricing and service quality. The number of bidders is not specified, which is crucial for understanding the true level of competition and its impact on price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it maximizes the pool of potential offerors, increasing the likelihood of receiving competitive bids and potentially lower prices.
Public Impact
Benefits NASA's administrative and management functions by providing specialized support. Services delivered are likely to enhance project management and operational efficiency within NASA's special projects division. Geographic impact is centered around NASA operations, with potential for remote work arrangements. Workforce implications may involve specialized consultants contributing to NASA's mission objectives.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to gauge success.
- Scope of 'SPM PRYXIS SUPPORT' is vague, raising concerns about potential scope creep.
- Limited information on contractor's specific experience with this type of specialized support.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost predictability.
- Contract duration of one year allows for focused project execution.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services sector (NAICS 541611). This is a broad category encompassing a wide range of advisory and assistance services. NASA, as a major federal agency, frequently procures such services to support its complex research, development, and operational activities. Spending in this sector within the federal government is substantial, supporting various program management, strategic planning, and operational efficiency initiatives.
Small Business Impact
The contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. This suggests that the primary focus was on securing the best offer from the broader market, potentially favoring larger, established firms. The absence of specific small business participation goals means there may be limited direct benefit to the small business ecosystem through this particular award.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program office within NASA responsible for the NTSS Special Projects. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed price contract type, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance reporting may be internal to the agency.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Management and Consulting Services
- Federal Administrative Support Contracts
- Special Projects Support
- NTSS Contracts
Risk Flags
- Vague Scope of Work
- Limited Performance Metrics
- Potential for Scope Creep
Tags
nasa, consulting-services, administrative-management, general-management, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, task-order, mississippi, colsa-corp, special-projects
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $101,415.12 to COLSA CORP. NTSS SPECIAL PROJECTS TASK ORDER 3.8.1.4.9 SPM PRYXIS SUPPORT.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is COLSA CORP.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $101,415.12.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-10-01. End: 2026-09-30.
What is the specific nature of the 'SPM PRYXIS SUPPORT' and what are the key deliverables expected from COLSA CORP?
The specific nature of 'SPM PRYXIS SUPPORT' is not detailed in the provided data. It is a task order under the NTSS Special Projects umbrella, suggesting it relates to specialized, potentially unique, or high-priority projects within NASA. Key deliverables would typically include reports, analyses, strategic recommendations, project management assistance, or operational support tailored to the objectives of these special projects. Without access to the full contract statement of work, the precise deliverables and their expected outcomes remain undefined. This lack of specificity makes it challenging to assess the contractor's performance or the true value of the services rendered.
How does the awarded amount of $1.01 million compare to similar consulting contracts awarded by NASA or other federal agencies for comparable services?
Comparing the $1.01 million award for a 364-day period requires detailed benchmarking against similar contracts for administrative management and general management consulting services (NAICS 541611) within NASA or other federal agencies. Factors such as the complexity of the support, the level of expertise required, and the specific deliverables significantly influence pricing. Generally, consulting services for specialized projects within agencies like NASA can range from hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars annually, depending on scope. A firm fixed price contract for this amount over a year suggests a defined scope. However, without specific details on the services provided and the contractor's qualifications, a precise comparison is difficult. Further analysis would involve examining contract databases for similar task orders, considering the contractor's proposed labor mix and rates, and evaluating the criticality of the support.
What is COLSA CORP's track record with NASA and in providing administrative and management consulting services?
COLSA CORP has a history of contracting with NASA and other federal agencies. Information on their specific track record for administrative and management consulting services, particularly in support of 'special projects,' would require a deeper dive into contract award databases and performance reviews. Agencies typically evaluate past performance as part of the procurement process. A review of publicly available contract data might reveal the volume and types of services COLSA has provided to NASA previously. Assessing their success in similar engagements, their ability to meet deadlines, manage costs, and deliver quality services would provide insight into their suitability for this task order. Their presence as a contractor suggests they meet basic eligibility and capability requirements.
What are the potential risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?
Potential risks include scope creep, where the project's objectives expand beyond the initial agreement, leading to cost overruns or schedule delays, despite the firm fixed price. Another risk is the potential for the contractor to under-deliver on quality or expertise if the scope is not clearly defined or if the contractor lacks specialized knowledge for 'SPM PRYXIS SUPPORT.' Performance issues or a lack of alignment with NASA's strategic goals for these special projects also pose risks. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust contract management by NASA, clear communication channels, defined performance metrics (even if not publicly detailed), and the agency's right to exercise contract remedies if performance is unsatisfactory. The firm fixed price structure itself acts as a risk mitigation tool for the government regarding cost.
How does this contract align with NASA's broader strategic objectives or ongoing initiatives?
This contract, as a task order for 'NTSS SPECIAL PROJECTS TASK ORDER 3.8.1.4.9 SPM PRYXIS SUPPORT,' likely aligns with specific, potentially sensitive or advanced, initiatives within NASA. Special projects often relate to cutting-edge research, development of new technologies, or addressing unique operational challenges that fall outside routine program activities. The administrative and management consulting services provided by COLSA CORP would aim to facilitate the successful execution of these projects, ensuring they remain on track, within budget, and aligned with NASA's overarching mission. Understanding the specific nature of these 'special projects' would be key to fully assessing this alignment.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 6728 ODYSSEY DR NW, HUNTSVILLE, AL, 35806
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $312,444
Exercised Options: $312,444
Current Obligation: $101,415
Actual Outlays: $2,315
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 1
Total Subaward Amount: $147,646
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 80NSSC23DA006
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-10-01
Current End Date: 2026-09-30
Potential End Date: 2026-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-09
More Contracts from Colsa Corp
- Scat 1 Engineering, Professional, and Administrative Support Services (epass) for AIR Force Life Cycle Management Center Mobility and Training Aircraft, Presidential and Executive Airlift, and Tanker Directorates (aflcmc/Wl, WV, WK) — $431.7M (Department of Defense)
- Task Order Award — $325.7M (Department of Defense)
- C4isr Task Order — $313.2M (Department of Defense)
- 199904!2100!0337!SG60 !USA Space and Strategic DEF CDR !dasg6098c0047 !A!*!* !19990108!20020216!102067378!102067378!102067378!n!4u825!colsa Corporation !6726 Odyssey DR NW !huntsville !al!35806!37000!089!01!huntsville !madison !alabama !0001!+000002938200!n!n!000000000000!ac23!rdte/Missile and Space Systems-Adv Tech DEV !A2 !missile and Space Systems !1caa!ballistic Missile Defense SYS !8731!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!A !N!R!2!002!K!* !Z!Y!Z!* !* !n!b!*!z!*!b!a!a!*!* !*!n!a!b!n!*!*!*!*!*! — $211.8M (Department of Defense)
- THE Huntsville Operations Support Center (hosc) Contract Specifies Technical, Managerial, and Administrative Work Needed to Ensure the Availability, Integrity, and Reliability of Mission Ground System Development and Operations in Support of National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) Space Programs. This Contract Provides Single or Multi-Program Unique Facilities, Systems, and Services, Both Local and Remote to Msfc, Supporting Nasa Spacecraft, Payload, Satellite, and Propulsion Systems Operations. the Contract Provides Cross Utilization of Resources Across Programs and Seamless Operations Support for Multiple Programs — $192.7M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →