NASA awards $26M task order to COLSA CORP for administrative management consulting
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $26,071,640 ($26.1M)
Contractor: Colsa Corp
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2024-10-01
End Date: 2025-09-30
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $71.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: THIS IS THE CONTRACT YEAR 2 TASK ORDER FOR LEVEL OF EFFORT SERVICES UNDER THE NTSS CONTRACT.
Place of Performance
Location: HUNTSVILLE, MADISON County, ALABAMA, 35806
State: Alabama Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $26.1 million to COLSA CORP for work described as: THIS IS THE CONTRACT YEAR 2 TASK ORDER FOR LEVEL OF EFFORT SERVICES UNDER THE NTSS CONTRACT. Key points: 1. Contract represents a significant investment in management consulting services for NASA. 2. Full and open competition suggests a potentially competitive bidding process. 3. Firm-fixed-price contract type aims to control costs and provide predictability. 4. Task order duration of 364 days indicates a focused, short-to-medium term need. 5. Geographic focus on Alabama highlights regional economic impact. 6. The contract falls under administrative management and general management consulting services.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The award of $26,071,640.37 for a 364-day period for administrative management and general management consulting services appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar contracts for management consulting services at NASA or other large federal agencies would provide a more precise value assessment. However, the firm-fixed-price structure suggests that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which is generally favorable for the government.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. This approach typically fosters a competitive environment, potentially leading to better pricing and service quality. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a robust competition.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it maximizes the potential for receiving the best value through a wide range of offers and competitive pricing.
Public Impact
Benefits NASA by providing essential administrative management and general management consulting services. Services delivered are expected to enhance operational efficiency and strategic planning within the agency. Geographic impact is concentrated in Alabama, where the contractor is based. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for consultants and support staff in Alabama.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness of the services.
- The 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' NAICS code is broad, and the specific deliverables are not detailed, posing a potential risk of scope creep if not managed carefully.
Positive Signals
- The firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process that should yield good value.
- The contractor, COLSA CORP, has a track record with government contracts, implying some level of established capability.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services (NAICS 541611). This sector is a significant component of federal spending, supporting a wide array of agency functions. Comparable spending benchmarks for management consulting services at agencies like NASA are typically in the tens to hundreds of millions of dollars annually, depending on the breadth of services required.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary impact on small businesses would be through potential subcontracting opportunities if COLSA CORP chooses to engage them. Without specific subcontracting plans or goals, it's difficult to quantify the direct impact on the small business ecosystem from this particular award.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) contracting officer and program managers. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract, requiring COLSA CORP to deliver services within the agreed-upon terms. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance reports may not always be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- NASA IT Consulting Services
- NASA Program Management Support
- Federal Management Consulting Contracts
- Department of Defense Management Consulting
Risk Flags
- Broad NAICS code may obscure specific service details.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics in award data.
- Number of bidders not specified for 'full and open' competition.
Tags
nasa, colsa-corp, administrative-management-consulting, general-management-consulting, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, full-and-open-competition, alabama, professional-scientific-and-technical-services, fy2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $26.1 million to COLSA CORP. THIS IS THE CONTRACT YEAR 2 TASK ORDER FOR LEVEL OF EFFORT SERVICES UNDER THE NTSS CONTRACT.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is COLSA CORP.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $26.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-10-01. End: 2025-09-30.
What is COLSA CORP's past performance record with NASA and other federal agencies, particularly in administrative management consulting?
COLSA CORP has a history of receiving federal contracts, including those with NASA. A detailed review of their past performance would involve examining contract databases for awards, performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any documented issues or commendations. For administrative management and general management consulting, their experience would be assessed based on the complexity and scale of previous projects, client satisfaction, adherence to schedules and budgets, and overall quality of deliverables. Specific examples of successful engagements in similar service areas would indicate a strong track record, while a history of performance issues or disputes would raise concerns.
How does the $26 million award for this task order compare to similar administrative management consulting contracts awarded by NASA or other agencies?
Benchmarking this $26 million task order requires comparing it to contracts for similar services (administrative management and general management consulting) with comparable durations and scopes. Federal contract databases can reveal the average cost per year or per hour for such services. If this award falls within the typical range for similar work at NASA or other large agencies, it suggests fair pricing. However, if it is significantly higher or lower, it warrants further investigation into the specific requirements, contractor capabilities, and market conditions that might explain the variance. The firm-fixed-price nature also means the total cost is capped, which is a positive indicator for value.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and deliverables associated with this task order, and how will their achievement be measured?
The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or detailed deliverables for this task order. Typically, administrative management and general management consulting contracts would include objectives related to improving efficiency, streamlining processes, strategic planning support, organizational analysis, or policy development. Measurement of achievement would rely on the establishment of clear metrics within the contract's Statement of Work (SOW), such as timely completion of reports, successful implementation of recommended changes, achievement of efficiency targets, or positive feedback from stakeholders. Without a defined SOW, assessing performance measurement is not possible.
What is the historical spending trend for administrative management and general management consulting services at NASA over the past five years?
Analyzing historical spending trends for administrative management and general management consulting services at NASA requires accessing federal procurement data over the last five fiscal years. This would involve filtering contracts by the relevant NAICS code (541611) and agency (NASA). Trends would reveal whether spending in this category has been increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable. Significant fluctuations might indicate shifts in agency priorities, budget allocations, or reliance on external expertise. Understanding this context helps evaluate whether the current $26 million task order represents a typical investment or an outlier.
Are there any identified risks associated with COLSA CORP's performance on this contract, such as past performance issues or financial stability concerns?
Assessing risks associated with COLSA CORP's performance requires a review of their past performance records, including any documented issues, disputes, or negative evaluations from previous contracts. Financial stability can be assessed through various means, such as Dun & Bradstreet ratings or publicly available financial reports if the company is publicly traded. While the 'full and open competition' and firm-fixed-price nature of this award suggest a degree of confidence, proactive risk management by NASA would involve monitoring these factors throughout the contract period. The absence of specific risk flags in the provided data does not preclude potential risks.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 6728 ODYSSEY DR NW, HUNTSVILLE, AL, 35806
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $26,071,730
Exercised Options: $26,071,730
Current Obligation: $26,071,640
Actual Outlays: $26,071,640
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 11
Total Subaward Amount: $12,871,716
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 80NSSC23DA006
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-10-01
Current End Date: 2025-09-30
Potential End Date: 2025-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-09
More Contracts from Colsa Corp
- Scat 1 Engineering, Professional, and Administrative Support Services (epass) for AIR Force Life Cycle Management Center Mobility and Training Aircraft, Presidential and Executive Airlift, and Tanker Directorates (aflcmc/Wl, WV, WK) — $431.7M (Department of Defense)
- Task Order Award — $325.7M (Department of Defense)
- C4isr Task Order — $313.2M (Department of Defense)
- 199904!2100!0337!SG60 !USA Space and Strategic DEF CDR !dasg6098c0047 !A!*!* !19990108!20020216!102067378!102067378!102067378!n!4u825!colsa Corporation !6726 Odyssey DR NW !huntsville !al!35806!37000!089!01!huntsville !madison !alabama !0001!+000002938200!n!n!000000000000!ac23!rdte/Missile and Space Systems-Adv Tech DEV !A2 !missile and Space Systems !1caa!ballistic Missile Defense SYS !8731!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!A !N!R!2!002!K!* !Z!Y!Z!* !* !n!b!*!z!*!b!a!a!*!* !*!n!a!b!n!*!*!*!*!*! — $211.8M (Department of Defense)
- THE Huntsville Operations Support Center (hosc) Contract Specifies Technical, Managerial, and Administrative Work Needed to Ensure the Availability, Integrity, and Reliability of Mission Ground System Development and Operations in Support of National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) Space Programs. This Contract Provides Single or Multi-Program Unique Facilities, Systems, and Services, Both Local and Remote to Msfc, Supporting Nasa Spacecraft, Payload, Satellite, and Propulsion Systems Operations. the Contract Provides Cross Utilization of Resources Across Programs and Seamless Operations Support for Multiple Programs — $192.7M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →