NASA awards $32.3M to General Dynamics for shared services support, extending contract through March 2024
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $32,346,625 ($32.3M)
Contractor: General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2022-10-01
End Date: 2024-03-31
Contract Duration: 547 days
Daily Burn Rate: $59.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: NASA SHARED SERVICES CENTER SUPPORT SERVICES - TASK ORDER - CY8
Place of Performance
Location: HUNTSVILLE, MADISON County, ALABAMA, 35806
State: Alabama Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $32.3 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: NASA SHARED SERVICES CENTER SUPPORT SERVICES - TASK ORDER - CY8 Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in essential administrative functions. 2. General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. is the sole awardee, indicating a focused selection. 3. The contract duration of 547 days suggests a need for sustained support. 4. The award is a delivery order under a larger contract, implying a phased approach to service delivery. 5. The fixed-price contract type aims to control costs and provide budget certainty. 6. The service falls under Office Administrative Services, a critical but often overlooked area.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $32.3 million over approximately 18 months for administrative support services appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar large-scale administrative support contracts for federal agencies suggests this pricing is within expected ranges. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost predictability for NASA, which is a positive indicator of value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation implies a competitive process was initiated. This approach is generally expected to yield fair market pricing and encourage innovation from potential offerors.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process is favorable for taxpayers as it maximizes the potential for competitive pricing and ensures that the government receives the best value for its investment.
Public Impact
NASA's internal operations and administrative functions will benefit from sustained support. Employees at the NASA Shared Services Center will receive continued operational assistance. The services provided are crucial for the day-to-day functioning of the agency. The geographic impact is primarily focused on the location of the NASA Shared Services Center in Alabama.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific bidder count limits full assessment of competitive intensity.
- Details on performance metrics and historical performance of the contractor are not readily available in this summary.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a robust bidding process.
- Firm fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
- The contract supports essential administrative functions critical to agency operations.
Sector Analysis
Office Administrative Services (NAICS 561110) is a broad category encompassing a wide range of support functions essential for the operation of federal agencies. This contract fits within the broader IT and professional services sector, where large prime contractors often provide integrated support solutions. Spending in this area is consistent across many government departments, supporting core operational needs.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component, as indicated by 'sb: false'. There is no explicit mention of subcontracting goals for small businesses within the provided data. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem from this specific award is likely minimal, though larger prime contractors often have broader subcontracting plans not detailed here.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the purview of the NASA Contracting Officer and the Program Management Office responsible for the Shared Services Center. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of financial oversight by locking in costs. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance reporting may be internal.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Shared Services Center Operations
- Federal Administrative Support Services
- IT and Professional Services Contracts
Risk Flags
- Potential for vendor lock-in due to single awardee.
- Performance metrics and quality assurance details not fully specified.
- Limited insight into the competitive landscape beyond 'full and open'.
Tags
nasa, general-dynamics-information-technology, office-administrative-services, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, it-support, professional-services, alabama, federal-agency, shared-services
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $32.3 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.. NASA SHARED SERVICES CENTER SUPPORT SERVICES - TASK ORDER - CY8
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $32.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2022-10-01. End: 2024-03-31.
What is the historical spending trend for NASA Shared Services Center Support Services?
Analyzing historical spending for NASA Shared Services Center Support Services requires access to detailed contract databases and budget allocations over multiple fiscal years. Without specific historical data for this task order or the parent contract, it's difficult to establish a precise trend. However, the recurring nature of support services contracts suggests a consistent need and budget allocation for these functions. Agencies like NASA often maintain stable funding for essential operational support to ensure continuity. Fluctuations might occur due to specific project needs, technology upgrades, or shifts in agency priorities, but a baseline level of spending for administrative services is generally expected.
How does the awarded amount compare to the total contract value if this is a delivery order?
The provided data indicates an award amount of $32,346,625.36 for a specific task order (CY8) under a larger contract. The term 'DELIVERY ORDER' suggests this is one of potentially multiple orders issued against a base contract. The total value of the parent contract is not provided in this data snippet. Therefore, a direct comparison of this award amount to the total contract value is not possible. This specific award represents the funding allocated for the services defined within Task Order CY8, covering the period from October 1, 2022, to March 31, 2024. The total contract value would encompass all such delivery orders issued over its lifetime.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract?
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for administrative support services contracts typically focus on efficiency, accuracy, timeliness, and customer satisfaction. For a contract like this supporting the NASA Shared Services Center, KPIs might include metrics such as response times for service requests, accuracy rates in processing documents or data, turnaround times for specific administrative tasks (e.g., HR processing, financial support), and user satisfaction surveys from NASA personnel utilizing these services. While the specific KPIs are not detailed in the provided data, they are crucial for ensuring the contractor meets NASA's operational requirements and delivers value.
What is the track record of General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. with NASA?
General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. (GDIT) has a significant and established track record of providing a wide range of IT and support services to NASA and other federal agencies. They are a major federal contractor with extensive experience in areas such as cloud computing, cybersecurity, mission systems, and enterprise IT. For NASA specifically, GDIT has been involved in numerous contracts supporting various centers and programs, often involving complex technical and administrative functions. Their long-standing presence and consistent awards from agencies like NASA indicate a generally positive performance history and a strong understanding of federal procurement and operational requirements.
What are the risks associated with relying on a single contractor for these services?
Relying on a single contractor, even one with a strong track record like General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc., introduces several potential risks. The primary risk is a lack of competitive pressure, which could potentially lead to complacency or less aggressive pricing in future contract renewals. If the contractor experiences performance issues, financial instability, or faces unforeseen operational challenges, it could significantly disrupt the essential administrative services provided to NASA, impacting agency operations. Furthermore, a sole reliance limits NASA's flexibility to adopt new technologies or service models that might be offered by other vendors. Mitigating these risks often involves robust contract management, clear performance expectations, and contingency planning.
What is the significance of the 'Office Administrative Services' classification for this contract?
The 'Office Administrative Services' (NAICS code 561110) classification signifies that this contract is primarily focused on providing a broad range of support functions essential for the smooth operation of an office environment. This can encompass services such as document management, mail processing, reception, scheduling, basic IT support, human resources administration, and financial processing support. For the NASA Shared Services Center, these services are critical for enabling the agency's core missions by handling the necessary behind-the-scenes operational tasks. This classification highlights the foundational nature of the support being provided, ensuring that NASA personnel can focus on scientific and exploratory endeavors.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Office Administrative Services › Office Administrative Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Wico Limited
Address: 3150 FAIRVIEW PARK DR STE 100, FALLS CHURCH, VA, 22042
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $32,346,625
Exercised Options: $32,346,625
Current Obligation: $32,346,625
Actual Outlays: $32,346,625
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: NNX16MA01B
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2022-10-01
Current End Date: 2024-03-31
Potential End Date: 2024-03-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-03-12
More Contracts from General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.
- Global Security Engineering&supply Chain Services — $1.5B (Department of State)
- THE Purpose of This Action IS to Establish a NEW Contract With General Dynamics Information Technology for Global Supply Chain Management, Logistics and Technology Development Services to Support the Department of State. the Initial Funding Associated With This Contract IS $22,304,578.00. the Overall Contract Value IS $2,200,000,000.00 — $1.2B (Department of State)
- Cloud Products&tools (CPT) — $902.0M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Beneficiary Contact Center Operations — $879.1M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Award of Task Order 47qfca210051-Nawcad Wolf Ship and AIR C5isr Systems Support — $832.3M (General Services Administration)
View all General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. federal contracts →
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →