NASA awards $5.65M facilities maintenance contract to Amentum Services, Inc. for Alabama operations
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $5,650,000 ($5.7M)
Contractor: Amentum Services, Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2025-12-31
End Date: 2026-06-30
Contract Duration: 181 days
Daily Burn Rate: $31.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: TASK ORDER FOR FACILITIES OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE SUPPORT SERVICES (FOMSS) - SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE OPTION PERIOD 9
Place of Performance
Location: HUNTSVILLE, MADISON County, ALABAMA, 35812
State: Alabama Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $5.7 million to AMENTUM SERVICES, INC. for work described as: TASK ORDER FOR FACILITIES OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE SUPPORT SERVICES (FOMSS) - SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE OPTION PERIOD 9 Key points: 1. Contract focuses on essential facilities operations and maintenance, ensuring continuity of NASA's Alabama-based activities. 2. The award is a delivery order under a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract, suggesting a pre-established relationship and streamlined procurement. 3. Amentum Services, Inc. has a history of performing similar services for government agencies, indicating potential for reliable execution. 4. The contract is firm-fixed-price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor and provides budget certainty for NASA. 5. The duration of the option period is 181 days, suggesting a short-term need or a transition phase. 6. The contract was awarded through full and open competition, implying a robust bidding process. 7. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561210 points to a specialized facilities support services market.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $5.65 million for an 181-day period represents a significant investment in facilities maintenance. Benchmarking against similar government contracts for facilities operations and maintenance is crucial. Given the firm-fixed-price structure, the pricing is expected to be competitive, but a detailed cost breakdown would be needed for a precise value assessment. The value appears reasonable for specialized, continuous support services required by a federal agency like NASA.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified vendors were likely solicited and submitted proposals. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this procurement method generally fosters a competitive environment, driving down prices and encouraging innovation. The agency's decision to use full and open competition suggests confidence in the availability of multiple capable sources for these critical facilities support services.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it typically leads to more competitive pricing and a wider selection of qualified contractors, ensuring the government receives the best value for its investment.
Public Impact
NASA's facilities in Alabama will benefit from continuous and reliable operations and maintenance support. The contract ensures the upkeep of critical infrastructure necessary for NASA's research, development, and operational activities. The services provided will support the ongoing mission objectives of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The contract may indirectly support the local workforce in Alabama through employment opportunities with the contractor.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen maintenance issues arise that are not adequately covered by the fixed-price structure.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical facilities operations could pose a risk if performance issues emerge.
- The short duration of the option period might indicate a need for frequent re-competition or potential instability in long-term service provision.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract structure provides cost certainty for the agency.
- Award to an established contractor like Amentum Services, Inc. suggests a track record of successful performance.
- Full and open competition indicates a robust and fair procurement process, likely resulting in competitive pricing.
Sector Analysis
The Facilities Support Services sector (NAICS 561210) is a significant component of the government contracting landscape, encompassing a wide range of services from janitorial to complex building operations and maintenance. Federal agencies, particularly those with extensive physical infrastructure like NASA, rely heavily on these services to ensure operational continuity and safety. Spending in this sector is generally stable, driven by the ongoing need to maintain government assets. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing the cost per square foot or per facility for similar maintenance contracts across various federal agencies.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a small business set-aside. However, the prime contractor, Amentum Services, Inc., may still engage small businesses as subcontractors, depending on their own subcontracting plans and the availability of qualified small business vendors for specific services. Analysis of Amentum's subcontracting history would be needed to assess the broader impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by NASA's contracting officers and program managers responsible for facilities operations at the Alabama site. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability by placing cost risk on the contractor. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements. The Inspector General's office for NASA would have jurisdiction to investigate any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Facilities Operations and Maintenance Contracts
- Government Facilities Support Services
- IDIQ Contract Task Orders
- Firm-Fixed-Price Service Contracts
Risk Flags
- Potential for contractor performance issues
- Risk of unforeseen maintenance costs impacting contractor profitability
- Short contract duration may indicate transition or limited scope
Tags
facilities-support-services, nasa, alabama, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, operations-maintenance, amentum-services-inc, federal-agency, service-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $5.7 million to AMENTUM SERVICES, INC.. TASK ORDER FOR FACILITIES OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE SUPPORT SERVICES (FOMSS) - SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE OPTION PERIOD 9
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AMENTUM SERVICES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $5.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-12-31. End: 2026-06-30.
What is Amentum Services, Inc.'s track record with NASA and similar federal agencies for facilities maintenance?
Amentum Services, Inc. has a substantial track record in providing facilities operations and maintenance (O&M) services to various government agencies, including the Department of Defense and other civilian agencies. While specific details of their past performance with NASA on this particular type of task order are not fully detailed in the provided data, their general experience in the facilities support sector suggests a capacity to handle complex O&M requirements. A deeper dive into contract databases like SAM.gov or FPDS would reveal specific past performance evaluations, contract values, and the scope of services previously rendered to NASA and comparable entities. This would help ascertain their reliability and expertise in meeting the demands of this contract.
How does the awarded value compare to similar facilities maintenance contracts for NASA or other federal agencies of comparable size?
The awarded value of $5.65 million for an 181-day period (approximately $31,215 per day) for facilities operations and maintenance needs to be benchmarked against similar contracts. Without specific details on the scope of services, square footage maintained, and the complexity of the facilities at NASA's Alabama site, a precise comparison is challenging. However, government-wide data on facilities O&M contracts can provide context. For instance, contracts for large federal installations often range from tens to hundreds of millions annually. This $5.65 million for a roughly six-month period suggests a significant, but not exceptionally large, scope, likely focused on specific operational needs or a particular facility complex. Further analysis would involve comparing cost per square foot or per facility type across different agencies.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?
The primary risks associated with this contract include potential performance deficiencies by the contractor, unforeseen maintenance issues leading to cost overruns (despite the fixed-price structure), and the risk of service disruption if the contractor fails to meet obligations. Mitigation strategies are inherent in the contract type and procurement process. The firm-fixed-price structure shifts cost risk to Amentum Services, Inc. The full and open competition process aims to select a contractor with a proven track record, reducing performance risk. NASA's oversight mechanisms, including performance monitoring and potential penalties for non-compliance, further mitigate these risks. Additionally, the contract likely includes clauses for termination for default, providing an avenue to address severe performance issues.
How effective is the firm-fixed-price contract type in ensuring value for money for this facilities maintenance service?
The firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally considered effective in ensuring value for money for services where the scope of work is well-defined and unlikely to change significantly, such as routine facilities operations and maintenance. For NASA, the FFP structure provides budget certainty, as the total cost is known upfront, minimizing the risk of unexpected cost increases. This shifts the responsibility for managing costs and potential inefficiencies to the contractor, Amentum Services, Inc. The value for money is realized if Amentum can perform the required services within the fixed price, potentially earning a profit through efficient operations. The competitive bidding process preceding the award further enhances value by ensuring the initial price is market-driven.
What are the historical spending patterns for facilities maintenance at NASA's Alabama facilities, and how does this award fit in?
Historical spending patterns for facilities maintenance at NASA's Alabama facilities would typically be found in NASA's budget documents, contract award databases (like FPDS or SAM.gov), and potentially in Inspector General reports. This specific award of $5.65 million for an 181-day option period suggests a recurring need for these services. If this is an option period under a larger IDIQ, it implies a history of utilizing this contract vehicle for such support. Analyzing past spending on similar services, the number and value of previous task orders, and the incumbent contractor would provide context. This award appears to be a continuation or renewal of essential support, fitting within the agency's ongoing operational expenditure for maintaining its physical assets in Alabama.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: TWO STEP
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: PAE Government Services Inc.
Address: 4800 WESTFIELDS BLVD STE 400, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $5,650,000
Exercised Options: $5,650,000
Current Obligation: $5,650,000
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 80MSFC17C0007
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-12-31
Current End Date: 2026-06-30
Potential End Date: 2026-06-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-25
More Contracts from Amentum Services, Inc.
- Logcap IV Services in Afghanistan — $7.4B (Department of Defense)
- KSC Institutional Services Contract (ISC) — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Enhanced Army Global Logistics Enterprise (eagle) - Army Prepositioned Stock (APS)-5 Kuwait/Qatar, Logistics Support Services, Including Maintenance, Supply, and Transportation — $1.3B (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Department of Defense)
- Contract Award for Contractor Logistics Support (CLS), Also Referred to AS Life Cycle Services, for the Government-Owned Fixed Wing Fleets Performing Transport Aircraft (TA) Missions, Currently Compromised of Small Weight Class Aircraft Models, Using Full and Open Competitive, Best Value Procedures With Formal Source Selection — $962.3M (Department of Defense)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →