NASA awards $3M contract for protective services at Marshall Space Flight Center to Chenega Global Protection
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $3,043,240 ($3.0M)
Contractor: Chenega Global Protection, LLC
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2025-10-01
End Date: 2026-09-30
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $8.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: NASA PROTECTIVE SERVICES CONTRACT - SOUTH REGION - TASK ORDER PROVIDES PROTECTIVE SERVICES SUPPORT AT MSFC.
Place of Performance
Location: HUNTSVILLE, MADISON County, ALABAMA, 35812
State: Alabama Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $3.0 million to CHENEGA GLOBAL PROTECTION, LLC for work described as: NASA PROTECTIVE SERVICES CONTRACT - SOUTH REGION - TASK ORDER PROVIDES PROTECTIVE SERVICES SUPPORT AT MSFC. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on essential security guard and patrol services, a critical function for NASA facilities. 2. The award was made under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration is one year, indicating a need for ongoing, but not long-term, security support. 4. The fixed-price contract type helps manage cost certainty for the government. 5. The specific NAICS code (561612) points to a specialized service within the security industry.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of approximately $3 million for a one-year period for protective services at a major NASA facility appears reasonable. Benchmarking against similar contracts for security guard and patrol services at federal installations of comparable size and scope would provide a more precise assessment. However, the fixed-price nature of the award suggests that the contractor has assumed the risk for cost overruns, which is generally favorable for the government.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources,' which typically means that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. While the specific number of bidders is not provided, this procurement method generally fosters price discovery and allows the government to select the best value offer. The exclusion of sources clause might indicate a specific reason for limiting initial outreach, but the 'full and open' aspect suggests broad participation was ultimately allowed.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process, even with an initial exclusion of sources, is generally beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages multiple companies to offer their best pricing and services to win the contract.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) and its personnel, who will receive enhanced security. The contract delivers essential protective services, including security guards and patrol operations. The geographic impact is localized to MSFC in Alabama. The contract supports jobs within the private security sector, specifically for Chenega Global Protection's employees.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific details on the number of bidders limits a full assessment of competitive intensity.
- The 'exclusion of sources' clause, even if followed by 'full and open competition,' warrants understanding the initial rationale to ensure no potential bidders were unduly excluded.
- Performance metrics and quality assurance details are not provided, making it difficult to assess the expected quality of services.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a potentially robust bidding environment.
- Fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
- The contract addresses a critical operational need for NASA's protective services.
Sector Analysis
The security guard and patrol services sector (NAICS 561612) is a significant part of the broader security industry. Federal agencies are major consumers of these services, contracting for physical security at numerous facilities. Spending in this sector is driven by the need to protect government assets, personnel, and sensitive information. Comparable contracts often involve multi-year durations and significant values, depending on the size and criticality of the facility being protected.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary contractor, Chenega Global Protection, LLC, is likely a larger entity. There is no information provided regarding subcontracting plans, so the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is unclear, though larger prime contractors often utilize small businesses for specialized support.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under NASA's contracting officer and program management. The fixed-price nature of the award places the onus on the contractor to deliver services within the agreed budget. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Specific Inspector General jurisdiction would depend on NASA's internal policies and the nature of any potential issues arising from contract performance.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Security Contracts
- Federal Protective Services
- Department of Homeland Security Contracts
- General Services Administration Schedules
Risk Flags
- Potential for performance issues if contractor personnel are not adequately trained or supervised.
- Risk of security breaches if patrol and guard services are insufficient or ineffective.
- Dependency on a single contractor for critical security functions.
Tags
nasa, protective-services, security-guards, chenega-global-protection, marshall-space-flight-center, alabama, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, naics-561612, fy2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $3.0 million to CHENEGA GLOBAL PROTECTION, LLC. NASA PROTECTIVE SERVICES CONTRACT - SOUTH REGION - TASK ORDER PROVIDES PROTECTIVE SERVICES SUPPORT AT MSFC.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CHENEGA GLOBAL PROTECTION, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $3.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-10-01. End: 2026-09-30.
What is Chenega Global Protection, LLC's track record with NASA and other federal agencies for similar protective services contracts?
Chenega Global Protection, LLC has a significant presence in federal contracting, particularly in security and protective services. A review of federal procurement data would reveal their past performance with NASA and other agencies. Their history likely includes numerous awards for guard services, physical security, and potentially specialized security operations. Assessing their past performance ratings, any past performance issues or disputes, and their experience with contracts of similar size and scope at other federal installations would provide crucial context for this award. Agencies often rely on past performance as a key evaluation factor, so a strong track record suggests a lower risk of performance issues for this new contract.
How does the awarded price compare to industry benchmarks for similar protective services at federal facilities?
To benchmark the value, one would compare the estimated annual cost of this contract (approximately $3 million) against similar protective service contracts awarded by federal agencies for facilities of comparable size, complexity, and geographic location. Key metrics would include cost per guard hour, cost per square foot of facility protected, or total cost relative to the facility's operational budget. Without specific details on the number of personnel, hours, and specific services required, a precise benchmark is difficult. However, the fixed-price nature suggests that the contractor has factored in expected costs and profit margins. If Chenega Global Protection has a history of competitive pricing on similar contracts, this award may represent good value.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?
Key risks include potential understaffing leading to security gaps, inadequate training of personnel, failure to adhere to NASA's specific security protocols, and contractor personnel misconduct. Mitigation strategies often involve robust performance work statements (PWS) clearly defining service requirements, stringent background checks and vetting for contractor personnel, regular performance monitoring and inspections by NASA officials, and clear contractual remedies for non-performance. The fixed-price contract type mitigates financial risk for the government regarding cost overruns, but performance risk remains. NASA's oversight and quality assurance processes are critical to identifying and addressing these risks proactively.
What is the historical spending pattern for protective services at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center?
Analyzing historical spending for protective services at MSFC would involve examining previous contracts awarded for similar security functions over the past several fiscal years. This would reveal trends in contract values, durations, and the incumbent contractors. Understanding this pattern helps determine if the current $3 million award is consistent with historical levels, represents an increase or decrease, and whether there have been significant shifts in the contracting approach (e.g., from sole-source to competitive). Significant deviations from historical spending could warrant further investigation into the underlying reasons, such as changes in security requirements, inflation, or market dynamics.
What specific security requirements does this contract address, and how do they align with NASA's overall security posture?
This contract specifically addresses the need for protective services, including security guards and patrol operations, at the Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC). These services are fundamental to maintaining a secure environment for personnel, critical infrastructure, research, and sensitive materials. The alignment with NASA's overall security posture would be detailed in NASA's internal security directives and risk assessments for MSFC. The contract's scope should directly reflect the identified security needs and threat landscape at the facility, ensuring that the services provided are adequate to meet NASA's standards for operational security and risk management.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Guards and Patrol Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 14420 ALBEMARLE POINT PL STE 100, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $4,558,857
Exercised Options: $4,558,857
Current Obligation: $3,043,240
Actual Outlays: $1,510,659
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 80KSC022DA001
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-10-01
Current End Date: 2026-09-30
Potential End Date: 2026-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-02-24
More Contracts from Chenega Global Protection, LLC
- Armed Security Guards for Atlanta&ft. Collins — $110.1M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- ATL FT Collins Guards Bridge — $33.3M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Base Award for Security and Access Control Services in Support of Usag-Ka — $26.3M (Department of Defense)
- Services — $23.9M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Nasa Protective Services Contract - South Region (npsc-Sr) KSC Task Order for Baseline and Pre-Priced Items — $16.7M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →