NASA's $4.1M facilities maintenance contract with Amentum Services, Inc. enters its 8th option year
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $4,108,423 ($4.1M)
Contractor: Amentum Services, Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2025-07-01
End Date: 2025-12-30
Contract Duration: 182 days
Daily Burn Rate: $22.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: TASK ORDER FOR FACILITIES OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE SUPPORT SERVICES (FOMSS) - SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE OPTION YEAR 8
Place of Performance
Location: HUNTSVILLE, MADISON County, ALABAMA, 35812
State: Alabama Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $4.1 million to AMENTUM SERVICES, INC. for work described as: TASK ORDER FOR FACILITIES OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE SUPPORT SERVICES (FOMSS) - SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE OPTION YEAR 8 Key points: 1. This contract represents a recurring need for essential facilities operations and maintenance. 2. The fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government. 3. The long-standing relationship suggests a level of contractor performance satisfaction. 4. The contract is a delivery order under a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) vehicle. 5. The services are critical for maintaining NASA's operational infrastructure. 6. The contract's duration and value indicate a significant investment in facilities upkeep.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of approximately $4.1 million for a 6-month period (option year 8) suggests a substantial but potentially reasonable cost for comprehensive facilities operations and maintenance services. Benchmarking against similar large-scale facilities support contracts across federal agencies would be necessary for a definitive value-for-money assessment. However, the fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of cost control. The longevity of this contract, now in its eighth option year, implies a consistent level of service delivery that has met NASA's requirements.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the competitive nature of the award process suggests that NASA sought the best value through a structured evaluation. Full and open competition generally leads to a more robust price discovery process and potentially more favorable pricing for the government compared to sole-source or limited competition awards.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from the assurance that the government sought competitive proposals, which typically drives down costs and ensures that the selected contractor offers the best combination of price and performance.
Public Impact
Benefits NASA's operational continuity by ensuring facilities are maintained and functional. Supports critical research and development activities by providing a stable infrastructure. The services are geographically focused on NASA facilities in Alabama. Maintains a safe and functional working environment for NASA personnel. Potentially supports a workforce involved in facilities management and maintenance.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost creep if scope is not tightly managed despite fixed-price structure.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical infrastructure maintenance over multiple years.
- Risk of contractor performance degradation over extended contract periods.
Positive Signals
- Fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.
- Contract is an option year, indicating satisfactory past performance.
- Services are essential for NASA's core mission operations.
Sector Analysis
Facilities Support Services (NAICS code 561210) is a significant sector within government contracting, encompassing a wide range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of buildings and infrastructure. This contract fits within the broader category of government support services, which often see substantial annual spending. Comparable spending benchmarks for facilities maintenance at large federal installations would likely be in the hundreds of millions or billions annually across various agencies, making this $4.1 million contract a specific, albeit significant, component of overall federal facilities management.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from a small business set-aside. The prime contractor, Amentum Services, Inc., is likely a large business, and any subcontracting opportunities would be at their discretion, not mandated by a set-aside provision.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract is likely managed by NASA's contracting officers and program managers responsible for facilities. As a delivery order under an IDIQ, the underlying contract vehicle would have its own oversight mechanisms. Transparency is generally provided through contract award databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Facilities Maintenance Contracts
- NASA Operations Support
- IDIQ Contract Vehicles
- Facilities Support Services
Risk Flags
- Long-term contractor reliance
- Potential for scope creep
- Performance degradation risk
Tags
facilities-support-services, nasa, alabama, delivery-order, large-contract, full-and-open-competition, fixed-price, operations-maintenance, option-year
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $4.1 million to AMENTUM SERVICES, INC.. TASK ORDER FOR FACILITIES OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE SUPPORT SERVICES (FOMSS) - SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE OPTION YEAR 8
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AMENTUM SERVICES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $4.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-07-01. End: 2025-12-30.
What is Amentum Services, Inc.'s track record with NASA on similar facilities maintenance contracts?
Amentum Services, Inc. has a history of performing facilities operations and maintenance services for NASA, as evidenced by this contract entering its eighth option year. This longevity suggests a generally positive track record and satisfaction with their performance. To provide a more detailed assessment, one would need to review past performance evaluations, any contract modifications, and the history of task orders issued under this and potentially other related contracts with NASA. Analyzing the number and nature of any disputes, claims, or contract terminations would also be crucial for a comprehensive understanding of their performance history with the agency.
How does the cost of this contract compare to similar facilities maintenance contracts at other federal agencies?
Directly comparing the cost of this $4.1 million contract for a 6-month period requires access to detailed data on similar facilities maintenance contracts across other federal agencies, including scope of work, service levels, geographic location, and contract type. However, given the fixed-price nature and the duration, it suggests a structured approach to budgeting for these essential services. Without specific benchmark data on per-square-foot maintenance costs or cost per facility type across different agencies, it's challenging to definitively state if this represents superior or inferior value. The fact that it's an option year under full and open competition implies that NASA believes it represents good value relative to the market at the time of award.
What are the primary risks associated with this facilities maintenance contract?
Key risks include potential over-reliance on a single contractor for critical infrastructure, which could lead to complacency or reduced incentive for innovation. Despite the fixed-price structure, there's a risk of scope creep if requirements are not meticulously managed, potentially leading to cost overruns or disputes. Contractor performance degradation over extended periods is another concern, as is the potential for unforeseen facility issues that may exceed the contract's defined scope or require significant additional investment. Ensuring the contractor maintains adequate staffing levels and expertise throughout the contract term is also critical.
How effective are the services provided under this contract in supporting NASA's mission objectives?
The effectiveness of these facilities maintenance services is directly tied to ensuring NASA's operational infrastructure is reliable, safe, and functional. By maintaining facilities, the contract supports the continuity of research, development, and administrative activities. The effectiveness can be measured by metrics such as facility uptime, response times to maintenance requests, safety incident rates within facilities, and overall user satisfaction from NASA personnel. The renewal and continuation of the contract through option years strongly suggest that the services have been effective in meeting NASA's needs and supporting its mission.
What are the historical spending patterns for facilities operations and maintenance at this NASA facility or similar NASA installations?
Historical spending on facilities operations and maintenance at NASA installations typically reflects a consistent, significant investment required to support complex scientific and engineering operations. While specific data for this particular facility isn't provided, federal agencies like NASA generally allocate substantial budgets to maintain their physical assets. Spending patterns often show a baseline for routine maintenance and operations, with additional allocations for capital improvements or unforeseen repairs. The progression of this contract through multiple option years indicates a stable, ongoing expenditure for these services, suggesting that historical spending has supported a similar level of maintenance.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: TWO STEP
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Pae-Parsons Global Logistics Services, LLC
Address: 4800 WESTFIELDS BLVD STE 400, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $4,108,423
Exercised Options: $4,108,423
Current Obligation: $4,108,423
Actual Outlays: $564,716
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 80MSFC17C0007
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-07-01
Current End Date: 2025-12-30
Potential End Date: 2025-12-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-02
More Contracts from Amentum Services, Inc.
- Logcap IV Services in Afghanistan — $7.4B (Department of Defense)
- KSC Institutional Services Contract (ISC) — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Enhanced Army Global Logistics Enterprise (eagle) - Army Prepositioned Stock (APS)-5 Kuwait/Qatar, Logistics Support Services, Including Maintenance, Supply, and Transportation — $1.3B (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Department of Defense)
- Contract Award for Contractor Logistics Support (CLS), Also Referred to AS Life Cycle Services, for the Government-Owned Fixed Wing Fleets Performing Transport Aircraft (TA) Missions, Currently Compromised of Small Weight Class Aircraft Models, Using Full and Open Competitive, Best Value Procedures With Formal Source Selection — $962.3M (Department of Defense)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →