NASA awards $119M cost-plus contract for facilities support services to Nova Space Solutions, LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $119,012,028 ($119.0M)
Contractor: Nova Space Solutions, LLC
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2025-07-01
End Date: 2025-09-30
Contract Duration: 91 days
Daily Burn Rate: $1.3M/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: THIS COSMIC TASK ORDER IS CREATED FOR FUNDING OF THE COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE CLIN 9004 OF 80SSC025D0001
Place of Performance
Location: NEW ORLEANS, ORLEANS County, LOUISIANA, 70129
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $119.0 million to NOVA SPACE SOLUTIONS, LLC for work described as: THIS COSMIC TASK ORDER IS CREATED FOR FUNDING OF THE COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE CLIN 9004 OF 80SSC025D0001 Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract type is Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF), which incentivizes cost control and performance. 3. The duration of the task order is 91 days, indicating a short-term or specific project focus. 4. The primary agency and servicing agency are both NASA, streamlining oversight. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561210 points to facilities support services. 6. The contract is a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle. 7. The base contract value is $130,782,400, with this task order representing a significant portion.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's value of $119 million for a 91-day period for facilities support services appears high on a daily basis. Without specific deliverables or scope details, it is difficult to benchmark against similar contracts. The CPIF structure allows for potential savings if the contractor performs efficiently, but the initial award amount is substantial. Further analysis of the cost breakdown and performance metrics would be needed to fully assess value for money.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this method generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service offerings for the government. The open competition suggests that NASA sought the best value available in the market for these facilities support services.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of obtaining competitive pricing and encourages a wider range of contractors to vie for government business, potentially leading to cost savings.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are NASA facilities and personnel who will receive essential support services. Services delivered likely include maintenance, operations, and potentially other facility-related functions. The geographic impact is concentrated at the NASA location(s) where these facilities are managed. The contract may have implications for the local workforce in Louisiana, where the contract is managed.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- High dollar value for a short-term task order raises questions about cost efficiency.
- Lack of specific details on deliverables makes it hard to assess performance expectations.
- CPIF contracts can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly.
- The base contract value is significantly higher than this task order, suggesting potential for future large awards.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust bidding process.
- CPIF structure incentivizes contractor performance and cost control.
- The contract is managed by NASA, a federal agency with established procurement processes.
- The task order is for essential facilities support services, crucial for agency operations.
Sector Analysis
Facilities Support Services fall under the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector. This sector is characterized by a wide range of specialized services supporting government and commercial operations. The market size for federal facilities support services is substantial, with numerous contracts awarded annually across various agencies. This specific contract fits within the government's ongoing need to maintain and operate its physical infrastructure efficiently.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation (ss and sb fields) is false for this specific task order. This suggests that the contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to have explicit subcontracting requirements for small businesses mentioned in this data snippet. Further review of the base contract and any associated small business subcontracting plans would be necessary to fully understand the impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will be managed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). As a federal agency, NASA is subject to various oversight mechanisms, including internal audits, program reviews, and potentially Inspector General investigations. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, where basic award information is publicly available. The CPIF structure itself includes performance metrics that NASA will monitor to ensure accountability.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Facilities Operations Contracts
- Federal Facilities Maintenance Services
- Cost Plus Incentive Fee Contracts
- Space Agency Support Services
Risk Flags
- High value for short duration
- CPIF contract type requires careful monitoring of costs and performance
- Limited information on specific deliverables and performance metrics
Tags
facilities-support-services, nasa, louisiana, delivery-order, large-contract, full-and-open-competition, cost-plus-incentive-fee, professional-scientific-and-technical-services, federal-agency, support-services
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $119.0 million to NOVA SPACE SOLUTIONS, LLC. THIS COSMIC TASK ORDER IS CREATED FOR FUNDING OF THE COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE CLIN 9004 OF 80SSC025D0001
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is NOVA SPACE SOLUTIONS, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $119.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-07-01. End: 2025-09-30.
What is the specific scope of work for these facilities support services?
The provided data indicates the NAICS code is 561210, which covers Facilities Support Services. This typically includes a broad range of activities such as building operation and maintenance, cleaning, groundskeeping, pest control, and security services. However, the precise scope of work for this specific $119 million task order is not detailed in the provided information. A comprehensive understanding would require reviewing the Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS) associated with the contract. This document would outline the specific tasks, deliverables, performance standards, and reporting requirements that Nova Space Solutions, LLC must meet.
How does the $119 million award compare to historical spending on similar NASA facilities support contracts?
Benchmarking this $119 million task order against historical NASA spending requires access to detailed historical contract data, including the scope of services, duration, and specific locations. Without that granular data, a direct comparison is challenging. However, NASA, like other large federal agencies, expends significant funds on facilities operations and maintenance. The value of this task order, while substantial, should be evaluated in the context of the specific facilities it supports and the duration of the service period (91 days). If this task order represents a recurring need or a significant expansion of services, it could indicate a trend in NASA's facilities spending. Further analysis would involve comparing the cost per day or cost per square foot supported against similar contracts awarded over the past several fiscal years.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and incentives within the Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) structure for this contract?
The Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) contract structure is designed to incentivize the contractor to perform efficiently and control costs. For this NASA contract, the specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and incentive targets would be detailed within the contract's Performance Work Statement (PWS) and the contract clauses. Typically, KPIs for facilities support services might include response times for maintenance requests, uptime of critical systems, energy efficiency targets, cleanliness standards, and safety compliance. The incentive fee would be tied to achieving or exceeding these KPIs, potentially offering the contractor a bonus for superior performance. Conversely, failure to meet minimum performance standards could result in reduced fee or penalties, depending on the contract's specific terms. NASA's contracting officers would monitor these KPIs closely to determine the final fee paid to Nova Space Solutions, LLC.
What is Nova Space Solutions, LLC's track record with NASA and other federal agencies for facilities support services?
To assess Nova Space Solutions, LLC's track record, one would need to consult federal procurement databases such as the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). These systems provide information on past contract awards, performance evaluations, and any past performance issues. A review of their history with NASA and other agencies would reveal their experience in delivering facilities support services, their performance ratings, and any significant contract disputes or challenges. A strong track record with positive performance reviews would indicate a lower risk for this current task order, while a history of poor performance or unresolved issues would raise concerns about Nova Space Solutions' ability to meet NASA's requirements effectively.
What are the potential risks associated with a 91-day task order valued at $119 million?
A primary risk associated with a $119 million task order for only 91 days is the potential for inefficient resource allocation or inflated costs due to the short duration. Such a high value for a short period might suggest a need for rapid mobilization, specialized equipment, or intensive services that command a premium. Another risk is the possibility that the scope of work is highly complex or critical, increasing the potential impact of any performance failures. Furthermore, if this task order is a stop-gap measure or part of a larger, poorly planned initiative, it could lead to wasted taxpayer funds. The CPIF structure aims to mitigate cost risks, but the initial award amount and the compressed timeline warrant close scrutiny of the contractor's execution and NASA's oversight.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: OPERATION OF GOVT OWNED FACILITY › OPERATE GOVT OWNED BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE (V)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 3800 CENTERPOINT DR STE 1200, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99503
Business Categories: Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $192,996,667
Exercised Options: $192,996,667
Current Obligation: $119,012,028
Actual Outlays: $8,494,652
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 80SSC025D0001
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-07-01
Current End Date: 2025-09-30
Potential End Date: 2025-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-23
More Contracts from Nova Space Solutions, LLC
- This Cosmic Task Order IS Created for Funding of the Cost-Plus-Incentive-Fee Clin 9002 of 80ssc025d0001 — $41.6M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Combined Operations, Services, Maintenance, and Infrastructure Contract (cosmic) Base Year - Core Cost-Plus Incentive FEE (cpif) Funding Order — $23.0M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- This Cosmic Task Order IS Created for Funding of the Cosmic Core Services for Cost Price Incentive FEE Clin 1004 of 80ssc025d0001 — $18.2M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Combined Operations, Services, Maintenance, and Infrastructure Contract (cosmic) Base Year - Core Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Funding Order — $3.5M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- This Cosmic Task Order IS Created for Funding the Cosmic Core Service (site Services) of the Firm Fixed Price Clin 1003 — $3.0M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →