NASA's $3M Facilities Operations Contract to Amentum Services Inc. for Year 7 Operations in Alabama
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $2,979,810 ($3.0M)
Contractor: Amentum Services, Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2024-07-01
End Date: 2025-06-30
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $8.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: TASK ORDER FOR FACILITIES OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE SUPPORT SERVICES (FOMSS) - AMENTUM SERVICES, INC OPTION YEAR 7 (USER AND COF)
Place of Performance
Location: HUNTSVILLE, MADISON County, ALABAMA, 35812
State: Alabama Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $3.0 million to AMENTUM SERVICES, INC. for work described as: TASK ORDER FOR FACILITIES OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE SUPPORT SERVICES (FOMSS) - AMENTUM SERVICES, INC OPTION YEAR 7 (USER AND COF) Key points: 1. This contract represents a significant investment in maintaining critical NASA facilities. 2. The firm-fixed-price structure aims to control costs by setting a predetermined price. 3. Amentum Services, Inc. has a track record with NASA, suggesting potential performance continuity. 4. The contract's duration of one year with options for extension allows for flexibility. 5. The services provided are essential for the day-to-day functioning of NASA's infrastructure. 6. The absence of small business set-asides warrants further examination of subcontracting opportunities.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract's value of approximately $3 million for a year of facilities operations and maintenance appears reasonable given the scope of supporting NASA facilities. Benchmarking against similar large-scale facilities support contracts for federal agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price contract type suggests that cost overruns are primarily the contractor's responsibility, which is a positive indicator for cost control.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. This competitive process is generally expected to yield fair market pricing and encourage efficiency from the winning contractor. The specific number of bidders and their proposals would offer deeper insights into the competitive landscape and its impact on the final price.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it typically drives down costs through market forces and encourages a wider pool of capable contractors to bid, potentially leading to better service at a lower price.
Public Impact
Supports the operational continuity of NASA's facilities in Alabama. Ensures the safety and functionality of critical infrastructure for NASA personnel. Contributes to the local economy in Alabama through Amentum Services, Inc.'s operations and potential local hiring. Facilitates the ongoing research and development activities conducted at NASA facilities by providing essential support services.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of explicit small business subcontracting goals may limit opportunities for smaller firms.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical facilities operations could pose a risk if performance degrades.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment.
- Firm-fixed-price contract type helps manage cost certainty for the government.
- Amentum Services, Inc. has prior experience, potentially leading to efficient service delivery.
Sector Analysis
Facilities Support Services, categorized under NAICS code 561210, is a significant sector within government contracting. This contract fits within the broader landscape of essential support services required by federal agencies to maintain their physical infrastructure. Spending in this sector is often driven by the need for operational continuity, safety, and compliance across diverse government installations. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing the total federal expenditure on facilities maintenance and operations across agencies like NASA, DoD, and GSA.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor does it appear to have specific small business subcontracting requirements explicitly stated in the provided data. This means that opportunities for small businesses to participate in this contract are likely dependent on Amentum Services, Inc.'s own subcontracting decisions. Further investigation into Amentum's subcontracting plan would be necessary to assess the impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
The oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) contracting officer and their representatives. Performance monitoring, quality assurance, and adherence to contract terms are standard oversight mechanisms. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Facilities Operations and Maintenance
- Federal Facilities Support Services
- Government Infrastructure Maintenance Contracts
- Aerospace Agency Support Services
Risk Flags
- Potential for complacency due to incumbency.
- Risk of knowledge loss if key personnel transition.
- Need for robust performance monitoring to ensure value.
Tags
facilities-support-services, nasa, alabama, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, full-and-open-competition, operations-maintenance, aerospace, government-contracting, service-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $3.0 million to AMENTUM SERVICES, INC.. TASK ORDER FOR FACILITIES OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE SUPPORT SERVICES (FOMSS) - AMENTUM SERVICES, INC OPTION YEAR 7 (USER AND COF)
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AMENTUM SERVICES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $3.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-07-01. End: 2025-06-30.
What is Amentum Services, Inc.'s past performance record with NASA on similar facilities support contracts?
Amentum Services, Inc. has a history of performing facilities operations and maintenance services for NASA. While specific details of past performance are not provided in this data snippet, the award of this option year suggests a satisfactory performance history on previous contract periods. Agencies typically maintain internal performance evaluations and contractor performance assessment reporting (CPAR) systems that would contain detailed information on Amentum's track record, including timeliness, quality of service, and cost control on prior NASA contracts. A review of these records would offer a comprehensive understanding of their reliability and capability in fulfilling such requirements.
How does the pricing of this contract compare to similar facilities operations contracts awarded by NASA or other federal agencies?
Direct comparison of this contract's pricing to similar facilities operations contracts requires access to a broader dataset of federal procurements, including detailed scope of work and service levels. However, the firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally favored for services with well-defined requirements, as it shifts cost risk to the contractor and provides budget certainty. The approximate $3 million annual value for facilities operations and maintenance at a NASA facility in Alabama is a starting point for comparison. Benchmarking against contracts for similar-sized facilities or those with comparable operational complexities across different agencies would be necessary to determine if this pricing is competitive and represents good value for money.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and service level agreements (SLAs) associated with this facilities operations contract?
The provided data does not explicitly detail the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or Service Level Agreements (SLAs) for this contract. However, typical KPIs for facilities operations and maintenance contracts include response times for service requests, preventative maintenance completion rates, energy efficiency targets, safety incident rates, and overall facility uptime. SLAs would define the expected standards for these metrics, often with associated remedies or incentives for performance. NASA's contract management team would be responsible for monitoring Amentum's adherence to these performance standards throughout the contract period.
What is the historical spending trend for facilities operations and maintenance at this specific NASA facility or for similar services across NASA?
Historical spending data for facilities operations and maintenance at this specific NASA facility or across NASA is not included in the provided information. To analyze spending trends, one would need to access NASA's historical contract databases and financial reports. This would involve identifying previous contracts for facilities support at the Alabama location and potentially similar contracts at other NASA centers to understand year-over-year spending, contract vehicle changes, and any fluctuations in service scope or cost. Such an analysis would help determine if current spending is consistent with historical patterns or represents a significant increase or decrease.
What are the potential risks associated with Amentum Services, Inc. being the incumbent contractor for this facilities operations role?
Potential risks associated with Amentum Services, Inc. as the incumbent contractor include complacency, where performance might decline due to a lack of competitive pressure if not rigorously managed. There's also the risk of knowledge transfer issues if key personnel depart. Furthermore, if the contract was not recently competed, there's a possibility that the government might be paying above current market rates if market conditions or service requirements have evolved significantly since the last competition. However, incumbency also offers benefits like continuity of operations and reduced transition costs, assuming performance has been satisfactory.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: TWO STEP
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Pae-Parsons Global Logistics Services, LLC
Address: 4800 WESTFIELDS BLVD STE 400, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $2,979,810
Exercised Options: $2,979,810
Current Obligation: $2,979,810
Actual Outlays: $1,731,106
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 80MSFC17C0007
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-07-01
Current End Date: 2025-06-30
Potential End Date: 2025-06-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-02-17
More Contracts from Amentum Services, Inc.
- Logcap IV Services in Afghanistan — $7.4B (Department of Defense)
- KSC Institutional Services Contract (ISC) — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Enhanced Army Global Logistics Enterprise (eagle) - Army Prepositioned Stock (APS)-5 Kuwait/Qatar, Logistics Support Services, Including Maintenance, Supply, and Transportation — $1.3B (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Department of Defense)
- Contract Award for Contractor Logistics Support (CLS), Also Referred to AS Life Cycle Services, for the Government-Owned Fixed Wing Fleets Performing Transport Aircraft (TA) Missions, Currently Compromised of Small Weight Class Aircraft Models, Using Full and Open Competitive, Best Value Procedures With Formal Source Selection — $962.3M (Department of Defense)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →