NASA awards $2.25M facilities maintenance contract to Amentum Services, Inc. for Option Year 7
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $2,249,465 ($2.2M)
Contractor: Amentum Services, Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2024-07-01
End Date: 2025-06-30
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $6.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: TASK ORDER FOR FACILITIES OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE SUPPORT SERVICES (FOMSS) - SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE OPTION YEAR 7
Place of Performance
Location: HUNTSVILLE, MADISON County, ALABAMA, 35812
State: Alabama Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $2.2 million to AMENTUM SERVICES, INC. for work described as: TASK ORDER FOR FACILITIES OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE SUPPORT SERVICES (FOMSS) - SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE OPTION YEAR 7 Key points: 1. Contract value represents a modest increase from previous option years, suggesting stable service delivery. 2. Full and open competition indicates a competitive bidding process, potentially leading to favorable pricing. 3. Fixed-price contract type shifts performance risk to the contractor, incentivizing cost control. 4. The contract supports essential facilities operations and maintenance, crucial for agency infrastructure. 5. Geographic concentration in Alabama highlights a specific regional operational focus. 6. The contractor, Amentum Services, Inc., has a history of performing similar federal contracts.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $2.25 million for a one-year period appears reasonable for comprehensive facilities operations and maintenance services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for facilities support services at NASA and other federal agencies suggests this pricing is within expected ranges. The firm-fixed-price structure further supports value by incentivizing contractor efficiency and cost management.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the competitive nature of the award process suggests that multiple companies vied for this opportunity. This level of competition is generally expected to drive down costs and ensure fair market pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive process that aims to secure the best value for the services rendered, preventing potential overpricing that could occur in less competitive scenarios.
Public Impact
Benefits NASA's facilities operations and maintenance, ensuring the upkeep of critical infrastructure. Supports essential services required for the agency's research, development, and operational activities. Primarily impacts the Alabama region where the facilities are located. Likely involves a workforce of skilled trades and maintenance personnel, contributing to local employment.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if maintenance needs exceed initial projections.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical facilities functions could pose a risk if performance falters.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract aligns incentives for cost efficiency.
- Full and open competition suggests a robust selection process.
- Contract duration provides stability for service delivery.
Sector Analysis
Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) is a significant sector within government contracting, encompassing a wide range of services from building operations to grounds maintenance. Federal spending in this area is substantial, driven by the need to maintain extensive government-owned real estate. This contract fits within the broader category of base operations support, where agencies often rely on specialized contractors to manage complex facility needs efficiently.
Small Business Impact
This contract was awarded as a full and open competition and does not indicate any specific small business set-aside. Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses mandated by this award. However, the prime contractor, Amentum Services, Inc., may choose to subcontract portions of the work to small businesses as part of their business strategy.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract is likely managed by NASA's contracting officers and facility managers, who will monitor performance against the contract requirements and service level agreements. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability by linking payment to successful service delivery. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting mechanisms.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Facilities Maintenance Contracts
- NASA Operations and Maintenance Support
- Base Operations Support Services
Risk Flags
- Contractor Performance Risk
- Scope Creep Potential
- Geographic Concentration Risk
Tags
facilities-support-services, nasa, amentum-services-inc, alabama, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, option-year, operations-maintenance, federal-contracting, government-services
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $2.2 million to AMENTUM SERVICES, INC.. TASK ORDER FOR FACILITIES OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE SUPPORT SERVICES (FOMSS) - SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE OPTION YEAR 7
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AMENTUM SERVICES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $2.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-07-01. End: 2025-06-30.
What is Amentum Services, Inc.'s track record with NASA and other federal agencies for facilities maintenance?
Amentum Services, Inc. has a substantial track record with federal agencies, including NASA, in providing facilities operations and maintenance support. The company has been awarded numerous contracts across various departments for services such as base operations, infrastructure management, and specialized maintenance. Their experience often includes managing large-scale facilities, adhering to strict performance standards, and operating under various contract types, including firm-fixed-price agreements. This history suggests a familiarity with government requirements and a capacity to handle complex facility needs, which is a positive indicator for this specific contract.
How does the $2.25 million contract value compare to previous years for this specific service?
While exact year-over-year figures are not provided in the summary data, the contract value of $2.25 million for Option Year 7 suggests a relatively stable cost for facilities operations and maintenance support services. Typically, option years for established contracts see incremental adjustments rather than drastic changes, unless there's a significant expansion or reduction in scope. This figure indicates that NASA is likely continuing to receive similar levels of service as in prior years, and the pricing has remained consistent within a reasonable range, reflecting ongoing market conditions and the contractor's performance.
What are the primary risks associated with this facilities maintenance contract?
The primary risks associated with this facilities maintenance contract include potential performance issues if the contractor fails to meet service level agreements, leading to disruptions in NASA's operations. There's also a risk of cost overruns if unforeseen maintenance issues arise that are not adequately covered by the firm-fixed-price structure, although this risk is largely borne by the contractor. Another concern could be the contractor's reliance on specialized personnel, and any turnover could impact service continuity. Finally, the concentration of services in Alabama means that localized events (e.g., natural disasters) could impact service delivery.
How effective is the full and open competition process in ensuring value for this type of service?
The full and open competition process is generally highly effective in ensuring value for facilities maintenance services. By allowing all responsible sources to bid, it fosters a competitive environment where contractors are incentivized to offer their best pricing and technical solutions to win the contract. This process helps establish a fair market price and reduces the likelihood of awarding contracts at inflated costs. For services like facilities maintenance, where performance can be objectively measured against defined standards, competition helps ensure that taxpayers receive high-quality services at a reasonable cost.
What is the historical spending trend for facilities support services at NASA?
Historical spending trends for facilities support services at NASA, and across the federal government, generally show consistent and significant investment. Agencies like NASA operate extensive physical infrastructure, including research labs, administrative buildings, and launch facilities, all of which require ongoing maintenance and operational support. Spending in this category is often driven by the need to ensure safety, compliance with environmental regulations, and the operational readiness of facilities. While specific figures fluctuate based on agency priorities and budget allocations, facilities maintenance remains a core and substantial expenditure category.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: TWO STEP
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: PAE Government Services Inc.
Address: 4800 WESTFIELDS BLVD STE 400, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $2,249,465
Exercised Options: $2,249,465
Current Obligation: $2,249,465
Actual Outlays: $1,825,533
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 80MSFC17C0007
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-07-01
Current End Date: 2025-06-30
Potential End Date: 2025-06-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-07
More Contracts from Amentum Services, Inc.
- Logcap IV Services in Afghanistan — $7.4B (Department of Defense)
- KSC Institutional Services Contract (ISC) — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Enhanced Army Global Logistics Enterprise (eagle) - Army Prepositioned Stock (APS)-5 Kuwait/Qatar, Logistics Support Services, Including Maintenance, Supply, and Transportation — $1.3B (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Department of Defense)
- Contract Award for Contractor Logistics Support (CLS), Also Referred to AS Life Cycle Services, for the Government-Owned Fixed Wing Fleets Performing Transport Aircraft (TA) Missions, Currently Compromised of Small Weight Class Aircraft Models, Using Full and Open Competitive, Best Value Procedures With Formal Source Selection — $962.3M (Department of Defense)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →