NASA Awards $3.14M for Fire Pump Room Construction to Wright Bros LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $3,141,419 ($3.1M)
Contractor: Wright Bros LLC
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2024-01-26
End Date: 2025-10-10
Contract Duration: 623 days
Daily Burn Rate: $5.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: AWARD PROJECT CONSTRUCT FIRE PUMP ROOMS
Place of Performance
Location: ORLANDO, BREVARD County, FLORIDA, 32899
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $3.1 million to WRIGHT BROS LLC for work described as: AWARD PROJECT CONSTRUCT FIRE PUMP ROOMS Key points: 1. Project involves construction of fire pump rooms, a critical infrastructure component. 2. Wright Bros LLC secured the contract, details on other bidders are unavailable. 3. The contract is a firm fixed price delivery order, indicating defined scope and cost. 4. This falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The award amount of $3.14M for fire pump room construction needs comparison to similar projects. Without benchmarks for this specific type of construction, assessing value is difficult.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES'. This suggests initial broad competition, but the exclusion of sources limits transparency and potentially impacts price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are used for this infrastructure upgrade. The limited competition aspect warrants scrutiny to ensure optimal pricing.
Public Impact
Enhances safety infrastructure at a NASA facility. Supports the construction industry and associated labor. Ensures operational continuity by protecting critical systems.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition method may impact price.
- Lack of detailed cost breakdown for assessment.
- Potential for scope creep in construction projects.
Positive Signals
- Addresses critical safety infrastructure needs.
- Firm fixed price contract provides cost certainty.
Sector Analysis
This project falls under Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. Spending in this sector can vary widely based on project scale and complexity. Benchmarks for specialized construction like fire pump rooms are essential for accurate valuation.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not awarded to a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses had opportunities to compete or subcontract.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight is crucial to ensure the construction meets safety standards and is completed within budget and schedule. NASA's procurement processes should provide adequate accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Limited competition
- Lack of detailed cost breakdown
- Potential for cost overruns in construction
- Need for clear performance metrics
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, fl, delivery-order, 1m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $3.1 million to WRIGHT BROS LLC. AWARD PROJECT CONSTRUCT FIRE PUMP ROOMS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is WRIGHT BROS LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $3.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-01-26. End: 2025-10-10.
What is the typical cost range for constructing fire pump rooms of this scale in similar geographic regions?
Determining the typical cost range requires detailed project specifications, including square footage, materials, pump specifications, and local labor rates. Benchmarking against similar government or commercial projects in Florida would provide a more accurate comparison. Without this granular data, assessing if $3.14M is competitive is challenging.
What were the specific reasons for excluding certain sources in the competition process?
The exclusion of sources typically occurs due to specific technical requirements, past performance issues, or unique capabilities needed for the project. Understanding these reasons is vital for assessing if the exclusion was justified and did not unduly restrict competition, potentially leading to higher costs for taxpayers.
How will the effectiveness of the new fire pump rooms be measured post-construction?
Effectiveness will likely be measured through rigorous testing and commissioning of the new fire pump system to ensure it meets all operational and safety specifications. Post-construction inspections, performance data collection, and adherence to fire codes will confirm the system's reliability and its ability to protect the facility.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 110 MANHATTAN DR, ANDALUSIA, AL, 36420
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, HUBZone Firm, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $3,141,419
Exercised Options: $3,141,419
Current Obligation: $3,141,419
Actual Outlays: $1,202,300
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 80KSC021DA002
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-01-26
Current End Date: 2025-10-10
Potential End Date: 2025-10-10 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-02-03
More Contracts from Wright Bros LLC
- Gaoa Davidson River Campground Reconstruction — $17.4M (Department of Agriculture)
- Design Build IRS Parking LOT Lighting Project, IRS Facility Memphis, TN. Project Located AT Building Tn0005zz — $5.0M (General Services Administration)
- Award of Task Order for the Construct Launch Abort System (LAS) Hangar M7-1459 Project — $3.0M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Task Order for Construction of NEW Jury and Mediation Rooms Ky0045zz Gene Snyder U. S. Courthouse 601 W. Broadway Louisville, KY 40202 — $2.4M (General Services Administration)
- Thermal Chamber Utilities Reconfiguration AT the Kennedy Space Center — $503.0K (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →