NASA awards $179M contract to SpaceX for Europa Clipper launch services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $179,375,086 ($179.4M)
Contractor: Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2021-07-23
End Date: 2025-01-31
Contract Duration: 1,288 days
Daily Burn Rate: $139.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: R&D
Official Description: EUROPA CLIPPER LAUNCH SERVICE
Place of Performance
Location: HAWTHORNE, LOS ANGELES County, CALIFORNIA, 90250
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $179.4 million to SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. for work described as: EUROPA CLIPPER LAUNCH SERVICE Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in planetary science missions. 2. Competition dynamics for high-value launch services are critical for cost efficiency. 3. Performance risk is mitigated by SpaceX's established launch capabilities. 4. This contract supports a key scientific objective of exploring ocean worlds. 5. The sector for space launch services is characterized by rapid innovation and increasing private sector involvement.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The $179.4 million contract for the Europa Clipper launch service appears reasonable given the specialized nature of the service and the contractor's demonstrated capabilities. Benchmarking against other government launch contracts for similar complex missions is challenging due to unique requirements, but SpaceX's pricing has historically been competitive in the commercial and government sectors. The firm-fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for NASA.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. The presence of two bidders suggests a competitive environment for this critical launch service. A competitive process is expected to drive more favorable pricing and terms for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition ensures that taxpayer funds are used efficiently by fostering a market that drives down costs through bidding.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiary is the scientific community, enabling crucial research into Jupiter's moon Europa. The service delivered is the launch of the Europa Clipper spacecraft, a vital component of NASA's exploration program. The geographic impact is global, as the mission will travel to the Jovian system. Workforce implications include highly skilled engineers, technicians, and scientists involved in spacecraft development and mission operations.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for launch delays impacting mission timelines.
- Reliance on a single contractor for a critical, high-stakes launch.
Positive Signals
- SpaceX has a proven track record of successful launches.
- Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost predictability.
- Competition ensures a baseline level of market validation for the price.
Sector Analysis
The space launch services sector is a rapidly evolving market with significant government and commercial investment. This contract falls within the guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing industry. The market is characterized by a few dominant players and emerging companies, with increasing demand for reliable and cost-effective launch solutions for scientific, commercial, and national security payloads. NASA's spending in this area is crucial for maintaining its scientific exploration capabilities.
Small Business Impact
This contract was awarded to a large business and does not appear to have specific small business set-aside provisions. However, large aerospace contracts often involve extensive subcontracting opportunities, which could potentially benefit small businesses within the aerospace supply chain. The prime contractor's subcontracting plan will be key to understanding the impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
NASA's contract oversight mechanisms are expected to be robust for a mission of this magnitude. This includes technical reviews, performance monitoring, and financial accountability measures. The contract's firm-fixed-price nature inherently limits cost overruns for NASA, shifting some financial risk to the contractor. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award announcements and mission progress reports.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Planetary Science Division Missions
- Space Launch Vehicle Procurement
- Commercial Spaceflight Development
- Jupiter Exploration Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for launch delays impacting mission timeline.
- Reliance on a single provider for a critical mission component.
Tags
nasa, space-x, europa-clipper, launch-services, space-exploration, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, california, definitive-contract, r&d, space-vehicle-manufacturing
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $179.4 million to SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP.. EUROPA CLIPPER LAUNCH SERVICE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $179.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2021-07-23. End: 2025-01-31.
What is SpaceX's track record with NASA launch contracts?
SpaceX has a strong and growing track record with NASA, having successfully launched numerous cargo and crew missions to the International Space Station under the Commercial Resupply Services (CRS) and Commercial Crew Programs. They have also been awarded contracts for other scientific missions, including the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) and the upcoming lunar Starship for the Artemis program. Their consistent performance and reliability in executing these complex launches have built confidence within NASA, leading to increased contract awards for critical missions like Europa Clipper.
How does the cost of this launch compare to similar historical NASA missions?
Direct cost comparisons for specialized scientific mission launches are complex due to unique payload requirements, mission objectives, and evolving market conditions. However, the $179.4 million awarded to SpaceX for the Europa Clipper launch is generally considered competitive within the current landscape of government and commercial launch services for deep space missions. Historically, NASA has utilized various launch vehicles, including those from United Launch Alliance (ULA), with costs varying significantly based on the specific rocket and mission profile. SpaceX's entry and continued success have introduced more competitive pricing dynamics into the market, potentially offering better value for similar capabilities.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract and how are they being managed?
The primary risks associated with this contract include potential launch delays due to technical issues, weather, or range availability, which could impact the mission's overall timeline and scientific objectives. There is also inherent risk in the success of the launch itself, although SpaceX has a strong flight record. NASA manages these risks through rigorous pre-launch reviews, performance monitoring, and by selecting a contractor with a demonstrated history of reliability. The firm-fixed-price contract also shifts some financial risk to SpaceX, incentivizing them to ensure a successful launch within the agreed-upon budget.
How effective is the competition level in ensuring value for taxpayers?
The full and open competition for the Europa Clipper launch service is a key mechanism for ensuring value for taxpayers. By allowing multiple qualified vendors to bid, NASA can solicit the most cost-effective proposals. The fact that two bidders participated suggests a healthy level of competition for this critical service. This competitive pressure encourages bidders to offer their best pricing and terms, thereby driving down costs and maximizing the return on taxpayer investment. A competitive environment also fosters innovation and efficiency among providers.
What is the historical spending trend for NASA launch services?
NASA's spending on launch services has historically been substantial, reflecting the high cost and complexity of space missions. Prior to the rise of commercial providers like SpaceX, NASA relied heavily on government-developed or government-contracted launch vehicles, often resulting in higher per-launch costs. Over the past decade, there has been a significant shift towards utilizing commercial launch services, driven by cost-saving initiatives and the maturation of the commercial space industry. This has led to more competitive pricing and a greater variety of launch options, although spending remains significant due to the ambitious nature of NASA's scientific and exploration goals.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › Space R&D Services
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: 80KSC021R0018
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1 ROCKET RD, HAWTHORNE, CA, 90250
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $179,375,086
Exercised Options: $179,375,086
Current Obligation: $179,375,086
Actual Outlays: $179,375,086
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2021-07-23
Current End Date: 2025-01-31
Potential End Date: 2025-01-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2024-11-18
More Contracts from Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
- THE Commercial Crew Program (CCP) Commercial Crew Transportation Capability (cctcap) Contract Will Provide Completion of the Design, Development, Test, Evaluation, and Certification of an Integrated Crew Transportation System (CTS) Capable of Transporting Nasa Crew to and From the ISS, in Accordance With the Design Reference Missions and Nasa's Certification Standards and Requirements. Certification of the CTS Will BE Determined by Nasa. Nasa Plans to Issue Task Orders for Post Certification Missions (PCM) to and From ISS That Include Ground, Launch, Lifeboat, On-Orbit, Return and Recovery Operations. the Minimum Quantity of Missions to BE Ordered IS TWO (2) and the Maximum Potential Quantity of Missions Which MAY BE Ordered IS SIX (6). in Addition, Nasa MAY Issue Task Orders for Special Studies Used for Risk Reduction and Other Purposes Related to the CTS. Nasa Certification Under Clin 001 IS Complete When the Contractor's Crew Transportation System (CTS) HAS MET Nasa's Requirements for Safely Transporting Crew to and From the International Space Station (ISS) in Accordance With Documents Identified in Section C.1, Specifications/Statement of Work. Subclins 001A and 001B, Identified in Table B.3,Ddte/Certification Subclins, ARE Delivery Milestones That Represent Completion of Required Work Necessary to Achieve Nasa Certification. Delivery Payment for the ISS Design Certification Review (DCR) for the Crewed Flight to the ISS Includes ALL Work Under This Clin That Occurs From the Contract Effective Date Through the ISS DCR Completion. the Delivery Payment for the Certification Review (CR) Will Include ALL Work That Occurs From the ISS DCR Delivery Date Through the END of the Ddte/Certification Clin 001. in Accordance With Clause C.1, Specification/Statement of Work, the Task Ordering Procedures and Other Terms and Conditions in the Contract, the Contracting Officer MAY Issue Post Certification Mission (PCM) Task Orders. the Contractor Shall USE the Mission Pricing Rates Shown in Table B.4.1, Post Certification Mission Prices. the PER Mission Prices ARE for a Single Order AT the Price Stated PER the Calendar Year (CY) Based on the Number of Missions Ordered. CTS Full Mission Capability Prices Shall BE Based on (1) Fulfillment of the Design Reference Mission to the ISS Found in Cct-Drm-1110, Crew Transportation System Design Reference Missions, Attachment J-03, Contract Performance Work Statement, and Other Terms and Conditions in the Contract and (2) ALL Inherent CTS Capabilities That ARE Within the Proposed Mission Prices. in Accordance With Attachment J-03, Contract Performance Work Statement, the Task Ordering Procedures and Other Terms and Conditions in the Contract, the Contractor Shall Perform Special Studies, Test and Analyses, AS Initiated by Written Direction From the Contracting Officer. Spacex Cctcap Post Certification Missions 3-6(PCM-3-6) Task Order Against Nnk14ma74c Clin 002, AS Described in Clause B.4 Post Certification Missions (idiq)(clin 002) and ALL Other Applicable Terms and Conditions — $3.0B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Work Required for the Design, Development, Manufacture, Test, Launch, Demonstration, and Engineering Support of the Human Landing System (HLS) Integrated Lander — $3.0B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Design, Develop, Manufacture, Test, Integrate, Achieve Nasa Acceptance, Deliver, and Sustain ITS United States Deorbit Vehicle (usdv) Such That the Usdv CAN Perform the Final Deorbit of the International Space Station (ISS) — $425.6M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle 1A-6 Launch Services — $313.8M (Department of Defense)
- National Security Space Launch Phase 3 Lane 1 — $307.7M (Department of Defense)
View all Space Exploration Technologies Corp. federal contracts →
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →