NASA awards $2.09M task order to Booz Allen Hamilton for cloud-based data integration services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $2,085,661 ($2.1M)
Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2025-03-15
End Date: 2026-03-14
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $5.7K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: TASK ORDER 136, BASE - NASA EARTH ACTION SOLUTIONS FOR ENERGY, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND THE BROADER COMMUNITY THROUGH FOCUSED CLOUD-BASED DATA INTEGRATION AND WEB SERVICES ADVANCEMENT ASSESSMENT
Place of Performance
Location: HOUSTON, HARRIS County, TEXAS, 77058
State: Texas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $2.1 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: TASK ORDER 136, BASE - NASA EARTH ACTION SOLUTIONS FOR ENERGY, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND THE BROADER COMMUNITY THROUGH FOCUSED CLOUD-BASED DATA INTEGRATION AND WEB SERVICES ADVANCEMENT ASSESSMENT Key points: 1. Contract focuses on advancing cloud-based data integration and web services for NASA's Earth science initiatives. 2. The award is a firm-fixed-price task order, indicating a defined scope and cost. 3. The duration of 364 days suggests a project with a clear, defined timeline. 4. The contract was not competed under simplified acquisition procedures, raising questions about competition. 5. The primary agency and office of responsibility is NASA, aligning with its mission to explore space and advance scientific knowledge. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541330 points to engineering services, a broad category. 7. The contract is a BPA Call award, suggesting it was issued under an existing Blanket Purchase Agreement.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $2.09 million for a 364-day duration for cloud-based data integration and web services appears within a reasonable range for specialized engineering and IT services. However, without specific benchmarks for similar NASA Earth science data integration projects or detailed scope of work, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. The firm-fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government, but the absence of detailed cost breakdowns limits granular analysis of pricing efficiency.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
This contract was awarded as a BPA Call, and the data indicates it was 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP'. This suggests that the competition may have been limited to pre-qualified vendors under an existing Blanket Purchase Agreement, or that it was awarded without full and open competition. The specific details of the BPA and the justification for not conducting a broader competition are not provided, making it difficult to assess the extent of market engagement.
Taxpayer Impact: Limited competition can potentially lead to higher prices for taxpayers as it reduces the pressure on contractors to offer their most competitive rates. It also limits opportunities for new or smaller businesses to compete for government work.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are NASA's Earth science programs, which will receive enhanced cloud-based data integration and web services. The services delivered will support the assessment and advancement of data solutions for energy, infrastructure, and broader community-focused Earth science initiatives. The geographic impact is primarily within NASA's operational centers, though the data integration may support broader scientific research. The contract supports the advancement of technology and data management within the federal government's scientific research sector.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of full and open competition may limit price discovery and potentially increase costs for taxpayers.
- Limited transparency into the specific technical requirements and evaluation criteria used for this BPA Call award.
- The broad NAICS code 'Engineering Services' does not provide granular insight into the specific technical expertise required.
Positive Signals
- Award to a large, established contractor like Booz Allen Hamilton suggests access to significant technical expertise and resources.
- Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
- The task order is aligned with NASA's mission objectives for Earth science and data management.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically related to IT and data management for scientific research. The market for cloud-based data integration and web services is robust, with numerous large and small businesses offering these capabilities. NASA, as a major government agency, frequently procures such services to support its vast research and operational needs. Benchmarking this specific award is difficult without more detail on the technical scope, but similar IT and engineering support contracts for federal agencies can range from hundreds of thousands to tens of millions of dollars.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a primary consideration for this specific task order. There is no indication of a small business set-aside. This means that opportunities for small businesses to directly participate in this contract, either as the prime contractor or through subcontracting, may be limited unless Booz Allen Hamilton voluntarily includes them in its subcontracting plan.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). As a firm-fixed-price task order issued under a BPA Call, the agency is responsible for monitoring performance against the defined scope, schedule, and deliverables. Transparency is limited by the 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP' designation, suggesting that standard public reporting on the competitive process may not apply. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- NASA IT Services Contracts
- Cloud Computing Services for Federal Government
- Data Integration and Management Services
- Earth Science Research Support
- Engineering and Technical Services
Risk Flags
- Limited Competition
- Lack of Detailed Technical Scope
- Potential for Higher Costs due to Limited Bidders
Tags
nasa, booz-allen-hamilton, cloud-computing, data-integration, engineering-services, firm-fixed-price, bpa-call, not-competed-under-sap, earth-science, texas, it-services, federal-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $2.1 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. TASK ORDER 136, BASE - NASA EARTH ACTION SOLUTIONS FOR ENERGY, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND THE BROADER COMMUNITY THROUGH FOCUSED CLOUD-BASED DATA INTEGRATION AND WEB SERVICES ADVANCEMENT ASSESSMENT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $2.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-03-15. End: 2026-03-14.
What is the specific technical scope of work for this task order, and how does it align with NASA's broader Earth Action Solutions initiative?
The task order focuses on 'FOCUSED CLOUD-BASED DATA INTEGRATION AND WEB SERVICES ADVANCEMENT ASSESSMENT' for NASA's Earth Action Solutions for Energy, Infrastructure, and the Broader Community. This implies the work involves enhancing how NASA collects, processes, stores, and disseminates data related to Earth science through cloud technologies. The specific deliverables likely include architectural assessments, development of new web services, integration of disparate data sources, and potentially recommendations for future cloud strategies. This aligns with NASA's ongoing efforts to leverage advanced data analytics and cloud infrastructure to better understand and address critical Earth systems challenges.
How does the $2.09 million award compare to similar cloud data integration contracts awarded by NASA or other federal agencies in the past year?
Assessing the value requires comparing it to contracts with similar scopes (cloud data integration, web services) and durations (approximately one year). Given the $2.09 million value for a 364-day firm-fixed-price contract, it suggests a mid-range award for specialized IT and engineering services. Larger, more complex cloud migration or platform development projects can easily reach tens or hundreds of millions of dollars. Conversely, smaller, more focused consulting engagements might be in the hundreds of thousands. Without specific details on the technical complexity and deliverables, direct comparison is difficult, but the price point appears reasonable for a dedicated team of specialists working on advanced data solutions for a federal agency.
What are the potential risks associated with awarding this task order without full and open competition, and how are they mitigated?
The primary risk of not competing under simplified acquisition procedures (SAP) or full and open competition is the potential for reduced price competition, which could lead to higher costs for taxpayers. It also limits opportunities for a wider range of vendors, potentially excluding innovative solutions from smaller or newer companies. Mitigation strategies typically involve ensuring the justification for limited competition is robust, that the chosen contractor offers fair and reasonable pricing, and that the government closely monitors performance to ensure value is delivered. For this BPA Call, the specific justification for limited competition would need to be reviewed to understand the rationale and associated risks.
What is Booz Allen Hamilton's track record with NASA, particularly in cloud computing and data integration services?
Booz Allen Hamilton is a large, established government contractor with a significant history of serving NASA and other federal agencies across a wide range of services, including IT, engineering, and data analytics. They have extensive experience in cloud computing strategies, implementation, and management, as well as complex data integration projects. While specific details of their past performance on similar NASA contracts would require further investigation into contract databases, their general profile suggests they possess the capabilities and experience necessary for this type of task order. NASA often relies on contractors like Booz Allen Hamilton for critical, high-level technical support.
What are the historical spending patterns for engineering and IT services at NASA, and how does this award fit within that context?
NASA consistently spends significant amounts on engineering, IT, and research support services annually, often in the billions of dollars, to support its diverse missions. This $2.09 million task order represents a relatively small portion of NASA's overall IT and engineering services budget. It fits within the pattern of NASA procuring specialized services through task orders under larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts or Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs). These types of awards are common for specific project needs, allowing the agency to acquire targeted expertise without needing to establish entirely new contract vehicles for each requirement.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SPECIAL STUDIES/ANALYSIS, NOT R&D › SPECIAL STUDIES - NOT R and D
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP
Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DR, MC LEAN, VA, 22102
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $2,085,661
Exercised Options: $2,085,661
Current Obligation: $2,085,661
Actual Outlays: $1,337,707
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 80JSC023AA001
IDV Type: BPA
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-03-15
Current End Date: 2026-03-14
Potential End Date: 2026-03-14 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-01-22
More Contracts from Booz Allen Hamilton Inc
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (General Services Administration)
- Transformation Twenty-One Total Technology Next Generation (T4NG) Task Order - Benefits Integrated Delivery — $1.4B (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (General Services Administration)
- Product and Technology Ecosystem Management Services (ptems)which Includes Product Delivery and Lifecycle Management to Transform VA by Tapping Into Emerging Technologies, Connecting Developers With VA Data, and Making Human Centered Design (HCD) — $1.1B (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (General Services Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →