NASA's CLPS program awards $1.93B to Firefly Aerospace for lunar payload delivery services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $19,323,865 ($19.3M)
Contractor: Firefly Aerospace Inc
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2023-08-25
End Date: 2027-08-31
Contract Duration: 1,467 days
Daily Burn Rate: $13.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: COMMERCIAL LUNAR PAYLOAD SERVICES (CLPS)
Place of Performance
Location: CEDAR PARK, WILLIAMSON County, TEXAS, 78613
State: Texas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $19.3 million to FIREFLY AEROSPACE INC for work described as: COMMERCIAL LUNAR PAYLOAD SERVICES (CLPS) Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in commercial lunar exploration capabilities. 2. Competition dynamics for this contract are crucial for driving innovation and cost-effectiveness in the space sector. 3. Performance risk is moderate, given the complexity of lunar missions and the need for reliable payload delivery. 4. This award positions Firefly Aerospace as a key player in NASA's ambitious lunar exploration agenda. 5. The contract's fixed-price nature aims to provide cost certainty for NASA. 6. The duration of the contract suggests a long-term commitment to developing lunar infrastructure.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The total contract value of $1.93 billion over approximately four years is substantial for lunar payload services. Benchmarking against similar large-scale space contracts is challenging due to the nascent nature of the commercial lunar services market. However, the value reflects the significant technical and operational requirements for delivering payloads to the Moon. NASA's investment indicates a strong perceived value in Firefly Aerospace's proposed capabilities for achieving lunar mission objectives.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
This contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' indicating a competitive process but with specific criteria that may have limited the pool of eligible bidders. While not a sole-source award, the 'exclusion of sources' suggests that only certain types of offerors or those meeting specific pre-qualification standards were considered. The number of bidders (2) is relatively low, which could impact price discovery and potentially lead to higher costs compared to a broader competition.
Taxpayer Impact: A limited competition with only two bidders may mean taxpayers are not benefiting from the lowest possible price that could have been achieved through a wider, more open bidding process.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are NASA and the scientific community, who will receive critical payload delivery services to the lunar surface. Services delivered include the transportation of scientific instruments, technology demonstrations, and other payloads to support lunar exploration goals. The geographic impact is global, focusing on the Moon as the destination, but with significant implications for the U.S. space industry and its international partnerships. Workforce implications include job creation and skill development within the aerospace sector, particularly in Texas where Firefly Aerospace is based.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for schedule delays given the inherent complexities of space missions.
- Technical challenges in ensuring payload integrity during launch and lunar landing.
- Reliance on a limited number of bidders could impact long-term cost efficiency.
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract structure provides cost predictability for the government.
- Award to an established aerospace company with growing capabilities in launch services.
- Alignment with NASA's broader Artemis program goals for sustained lunar presence.
Sector Analysis
The Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) initiative represents a significant shift in how NASA procures lunar delivery services, leveraging commercial capabilities. This sector is rapidly evolving, with numerous companies vying for contracts. The total addressable market for lunar services is projected to grow substantially as more nations and private entities pursue lunar missions. This contract with Firefly Aerospace fits within this burgeoning market, aiming to establish reliable and cost-effective access to the lunar surface, a key component for future space exploration and resource utilization.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component (sb: false). While Firefly Aerospace is a significant player, the primary contract award is not directly benefiting small businesses through set-asides. However, there may be opportunities for small businesses to participate as subcontractors to Firefly Aerospace, contributing specialized services or components. The impact on the broader small business ecosystem will depend on the extent of subcontracting opportunities created by this large prime contract.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will be managed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Accountability measures are embedded within the contract's performance requirements and delivery schedules. Transparency is facilitated through NASA's public contract awards and reporting mechanisms. The Inspector General's office within NASA would have jurisdiction to investigate any potential fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract.
Related Government Programs
- Artemis Program
- Lunar Exploration
- Commercial Spaceflight
- Payload Delivery Services
- Space Launch Services
Risk Flags
- Limited competition may impact price.
- Newer entrant in large-scale lunar delivery.
- Technical feasibility of lunar landing and payload deployment.
- Long-term sustainability of commercial lunar services market.
Tags
nasa, commercial-lunar-payload-services, firefly-aerospace, payload-delivery, lunar-exploration, space-transportation, firm-fixed-price, limited-competition, texas, aerospace, full-and-open-competition-after-exclusion-of-sources, delivery-order
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $19.3 million to FIREFLY AEROSPACE INC. COMMERCIAL LUNAR PAYLOAD SERVICES (CLPS)
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is FIREFLY AEROSPACE INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $19.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-08-25. End: 2027-08-31.
What is Firefly Aerospace's track record with NASA and other government agencies for similar payload delivery services?
Firefly Aerospace is a relatively newer entrant in the large-scale space launch and payload delivery market compared to established giants. While they have secured significant funding and are developing their launch vehicle capabilities, their track record with NASA for actual lunar payload delivery services is still developing. This CLPS contract represents a major milestone and a significant validation of their capabilities. Prior to this, their experience might be more focused on suborbital flights, technology demonstrations, and securing launch contracts for smaller payloads or satellite constellations. Their ability to successfully execute this contract will be a defining factor in their future government contracting opportunities.
How does the value of this contract compare to other NASA CLPS awards?
The $1.93 billion value for this specific delivery order under the CLPS program is substantial and likely one of the larger awards within the initiative. NASA has awarded multiple task orders under the CLPS indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract to various providers. While specific values for each delivery order vary based on the mission's complexity, payload size, and destination, this award to Firefly Aerospace indicates a significant scope of work. For context, other CLPS awards have ranged from tens to hundreds of millions of dollars for individual missions, reflecting the diverse needs and capabilities within the program. This particular award suggests a multi-mission or a particularly complex single mission requirement.
What are the primary technical and performance risks associated with this contract?
The primary technical risks revolve around the successful development, testing, and operation of Firefly Aerospace's launch vehicles and lunar landers. This includes ensuring the reliability of propulsion systems, navigation, guidance, and control systems for both launch and lunar descent. Performance risks are tied to meeting stringent delivery timelines, payload integration requirements, and ensuring the survival and functionality of payloads upon arrival on the lunar surface. Environmental factors on the Moon, such as extreme temperatures and radiation, also pose significant risks to payload integrity. NASA's oversight and Firefly's mitigation strategies will be critical in managing these risks.
How does this contract contribute to NASA's broader goals for lunar exploration and the Artemis program?
This contract is a cornerstone of NASA's strategy to utilize commercial services for lunar exploration, a key component of the Artemis program. By outsourcing payload delivery to commercial providers like Firefly Aerospace, NASA can focus its resources on scientific research, technology development, and astronaut missions. The CLPS initiative aims to establish a regular cadence of lunar deliveries, supporting the scientific investigation of the Moon, testing technologies for future Mars missions, and paving the way for a sustained human presence. This award directly enables the transportation of scientific instruments and technology demonstrations needed to achieve these ambitious goals.
What are the historical spending patterns for lunar payload delivery services by NASA?
Historically, NASA has managed its lunar payload delivery missions primarily through in-house development or direct contracts with aerospace prime contractors for specific missions, often involving large, custom-built spacecraft. The shift to the CLPS model, with its IDIQ structure and multiple commercial providers, represents a significant departure from historical spending patterns. This new approach aims to foster a more dynamic and competitive market, reduce costs through commercial innovation, and increase the frequency of lunar missions. Prior to CLPS, spending was more project-specific and less focused on establishing a recurring commercial service.
What is the significance of the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' designation for this award?
This designation indicates that while the contract was competed, certain sources were excluded from the competition. This typically occurs when specific capabilities, technologies, or certifications are required that only a limited number of companies possess. It suggests that NASA likely issued a Request for Information (RFI) or conducted market research to identify potential providers with the necessary expertise and infrastructure for lunar payload delivery. The exclusion of other sources implies that only those meeting stringent pre-defined criteria were invited to submit proposals, potentially streamlining the acquisition process but also limiting the breadth of competition.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Transportation and Warehousing › Nonscheduled Air Transportation › Nonscheduled Chartered Freight Air Transportation
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › Space R&D Services
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1320 ARROW POINT DR, CEDAR PARK, TX, 78613
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $19,323,865
Exercised Options: $19,323,865
Current Obligation: $19,323,865
Actual Outlays: $11,706,701
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 80HQTR19D0009
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-08-25
Current End Date: 2027-08-31
Potential End Date: 2027-08-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-19
More Contracts from Firefly Aerospace Inc
- Commercial Lunar Payload Services (clps) Task Order CS-3 — $112.8M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Enhamced Landing and Monility Study — $110.6M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Commercial Lunar Payload Services (clps) — $99.3M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Commercial Lunar Payload Services (clps) Contract Task Order CS-6 — $57.5M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Venture-Class Acquisition of Dedicated and Rideshare (vadr) Umbrella Task Order — $24.2M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →