NASA awards Intuitive Machines $2.6M for lunar payload delivery, focusing on guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $2,625,000 ($2.6M)
Contractor: Intuitive Machines, LLC
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2025-09-30
End Date: 2026-09-30
Contract Duration: 365 days
Daily Burn Rate: $7.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 24
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: PHASE E LROC CONTRACT AWARD
Place of Performance
Location: TEMPE, MARICOPA County, ARIZONA, 85287
State: Arizona Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $2.6 million to INTUITIVE MACHINES, LLC for work described as: PHASE E LROC CONTRACT AWARD Key points: 1. The contract value represents a significant investment in lunar logistics capabilities. 2. Competition dynamics for this award are assessed to understand pricing efficiency. 3. Risk indicators are evaluated based on contractor performance and project scope. 4. Performance context is established by comparing this award to similar space missions. 5. The contract positions Intuitive Machines within the growing commercial space sector. 6. The award type, a definitive contract, suggests a well-defined scope of work.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $2.6 million for lunar payload delivery appears reasonable given the specialized nature of space missions. Benchmarking against similar contracts for lunar lander development or payload integration would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, the cost-plus-fixed-fee structure allows for cost control while incentivizing efficient performance. The specific deliverables and technical requirements will ultimately determine the true value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. The presence of 24 bidders suggests a robust and competitive market for lunar payload delivery services. This level of competition is generally favorable for price discovery and can lead to more cost-effective solutions for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process ensures that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently, driving down costs and potentially leading to innovative solutions for lunar missions.
Public Impact
This contract directly benefits NASA's Artemis program by enabling the delivery of payloads to the lunar surface. The services delivered will support scientific research and exploration objectives on the Moon. The geographic impact is focused on the Moon, with ground operations likely in Arizona. Workforce implications include specialized engineering and technical roles within Intuitive Machines and its subcontractors.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns inherent in cost-plus contracts if not managed tightly.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical lunar payload delivery.
- Technical risks associated with novel space vehicle manufacturing and operation.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive market.
- Intuitive Machines has a track record in lunar exploration technology development.
- The definitive contract structure implies a clear understanding of project scope and requirements.
Sector Analysis
The commercial space sector, particularly lunar exploration and logistics, is experiencing rapid growth driven by government and private investment. This contract fits within the broader market for space vehicle manufacturing and launch services, which is valued in the billions of dollars globally. Comparable spending benchmarks would include other NASA contracts for lunar lander development and payload integration, as well as commercial ventures in the New Space economy.
Small Business Impact
While this specific contract does not indicate a small business set-aside, the competitive nature of the award suggests opportunities for small businesses to participate as subcontractors. The success of Intuitive Machines could lead to further subcontracting opportunities within the lunar exploration ecosystem, fostering growth for smaller players in the aerospace industry.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight will be provided by NASA's contracting officers and program managers, ensuring adherence to contract terms and performance milestones. Accountability measures are built into the cost-plus-fixed-fee structure, which links contractor payment to performance. Transparency is expected through regular reporting requirements and potential public releases of mission outcomes.
Related Government Programs
- Artemis Program
- Lunar Payload Services
- Space Vehicle Manufacturing
- Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS)
Risk Flags
- Potential for schedule delays impacting broader NASA programs.
- Technical challenges in lunar vehicle manufacturing and operation.
- Cost management within a Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure.
Tags
nasa, intuitive-machines, lunar-payload-delivery, space-vehicle-manufacturing, definitive-contract, cost-plus-fixed-fee, full-and-open-competition, arizona, commercial-space, artemis-program
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $2.6 million to INTUITIVE MACHINES, LLC. PHASE E LROC CONTRACT AWARD
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is INTUITIVE MACHINES, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $2.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-09-30. End: 2026-09-30.
What is Intuitive Machines' track record with NASA and similar government contracts?
Intuitive Machines has a notable track record with NASA, particularly in the context of the Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) initiative. They were selected for multiple CLPS missions, including delivering payloads to the lunar surface. Their Odysseus lander successfully landed on the Moon in February 2024, demonstrating their capability in lunar operations. While this specific contract is for manufacturing, their prior mission successes provide a degree of confidence in their technical expertise and ability to execute complex space-related projects. Further analysis would involve reviewing past performance evaluations and any debriefings from previous contract awards.
How does the $2.6 million award compare to other lunar payload delivery contracts?
The $2.6 million award for this specific lunar payload delivery contract appears to be on the lower end when compared to the total cost of some larger CLPS missions, which can range from tens to hundreds of millions of dollars for the entire mission including launch and multiple payloads. However, this contract is specifically for the 'PHASE E LROC CONTRACT AWARD,' suggesting it might cover a specific phase of development, manufacturing, or a particular component rather than the entire mission lifecycle. Benchmarking requires a detailed understanding of the scope of work, the specific payloads, and the technological maturity required. Contracts for lunar lander development and integration can vary significantly based on payload mass, destination, and mission complexity.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract for NASA?
The primary risks associated with this contract for NASA include technical risks related to the successful manufacturing and integration of the lunar payload delivery system, potential schedule delays impacting broader program timelines (like Artemis), and cost risks inherent in the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type if cost overruns are not effectively managed. There's also a programmatic risk if the delivered capabilities do not meet the scientific or operational requirements for lunar surface access. Ensuring the reliability and performance of the space vehicle in the harsh lunar environment is a critical technical challenge.
What is the expected effectiveness of this contract in achieving NASA's lunar exploration goals?
This contract is expected to be effective in advancing NASA's lunar exploration goals by providing a dedicated capability for delivering payloads to the lunar surface. By leveraging commercial partners like Intuitive Machines, NASA aims to reduce the cost and complexity of lunar access, enabling more frequent scientific missions and the establishment of a sustained human presence. The success of this contract will contribute to the overall CLPS initiative, which is designed to support the Artemis program by delivering science and technology payloads to the Moon. The effectiveness will be measured by the successful delivery of payloads, the scientific return from those payloads, and the reliability of the delivery system.
What are historical spending patterns for similar lunar payload delivery services?
Historical spending patterns for lunar payload delivery services have significantly evolved with the advent of the CLPS initiative. Prior to CLPS, such services were largely non-existent or prohibitively expensive, often embedded within larger, government-led mission architectures. Since the establishment of CLPS, NASA has awarded numerous contracts to various commercial entities, ranging from small amounts for feasibility studies to substantial sums for lander development and payload delivery. Spending has shifted towards a more diversified, commercial-centric model. The total investment in CLPS missions awarded to date runs into the hundreds of millions of dollars, reflecting a strategic push to foster a lunar economy and accelerate exploration.
What is the significance of the 'DEFINITIVE CONTRACT' award type?
The 'Definitive Contract' award type signifies a firm, legally binding agreement between NASA and Intuitive Machines for the specified goods or services. Unlike other contract types like letter contracts or basic ordering agreements, a definitive contract typically has a clearly defined scope, price, and delivery schedule. This suggests that the requirements for this 'PHASE E LROC CONTRACT AWARD' are well-understood and finalized. For NASA, this provides a high degree of certainty regarding the contractor's obligations and the expected outcome, while for Intuitive Machines, it offers a clear commitment from the agency, enabling focused resource allocation and execution.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › Space R&D Services
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 24
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 13467 COLUMBIA SHUTTLE ST, HOUSTON, TX, 77059
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $15,544,636
Exercised Options: $5,014,621
Current Obligation: $2,625,000
Actual Outlays: $603,182
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-09-30
Current End Date: 2026-09-30
Potential End Date: 2028-09-29 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-02-05
More Contracts from Intuitive Machines, LLC
- Lunar Surface Transportation-Nasa Provided Lunar Payload (nplp) Delivery — $116.9M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Commercial Lunar Payload Services (clps) — $88.0M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Clps Task Order CP-11 Clps Payloads and Research Investigations on the Surface of the Moon — $85.6M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Commercial Lunar Payload Services (clps) Task Order (TO) Polar Resource Ice-Mining Experiment-1 (prime-1) Lunar Surface Payload Delivery -Lunar Pole — $56.3M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Deployable Hopper for Extreme Lunar Surface Access. Develop and Demonstrate a Small Robotic Hopper, Deployed AS a Secondary Payload From the Nova-C Lander, That CAN Provide Access to Extreme Environments and Locations of Interest on the Lunar Surface — $40.6M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →