NASA awards $149M facilities support contract to ASRC Federal Facilities Logistics LLC for Goddard Space Flight Center
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $149,096,418 ($149.1M)
Contractor: Asrc Federal Facilities Logistics LLC
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2023-09-15
End Date: 2028-09-14
Contract Duration: 1,826 days
Daily Burn Rate: $81.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: THE PURPOSE OF THIS CONTRACT IS TO ACQUIRE REPAIRS, OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE, AND ENGINEERING (ROME) AND RELATED SERVICES FOR THE GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER (GREENBELT AND WALLOPS FLIGHT FACILITY).
Place of Performance
Location: GREENBELT, PRINCE GEORGES County, MARYLAND, 20771
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $149.1 million to ASRC FEDERAL FACILITIES LOGISTICS LLC for work described as: THE PURPOSE OF THIS CONTRACT IS TO ACQUIRE REPAIRS, OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE, AND ENGINEERING (ROME) AND RELATED SERVICES FOR THE GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER (GREENBELT AND WALLOPS FLIGHT FACILITY). Key points: 1. Contract provides essential repairs, operations, maintenance, and engineering services. 2. ASRC Federal Facilities Logistics LLC selected through full and open competition. 3. Contract duration of 5 years indicates a long-term need for these services. 4. The services are critical for the operational readiness of Goddard Space Flight Center. 5. This contract falls under Facilities Support Services, a broad category of essential infrastructure management.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $149 million over five years suggests a significant investment in maintaining critical NASA facilities. Benchmarking against similar large-scale facilities support contracts for federal agencies would provide a clearer picture of value for money. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) pricing structure necessitates careful oversight to ensure costs remain reasonable and the fixed fee aligns with the scope of work and contractor performance.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources,' indicating that multiple qualified vendors were solicited and evaluated. The presence of four bidders suggests a competitive environment, which typically drives better pricing and service offerings for the government. The specific exclusion of sources might relate to unique capabilities or past performance requirements.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process generally leads to more favorable pricing for taxpayers by encouraging vendors to offer their best terms.
Public Impact
Benefits NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center by ensuring the operational integrity of its facilities. Delivers essential maintenance, repair, and engineering services for critical infrastructure. Primarily impacts Maryland, specifically the Greenbelt and Wallops Flight Facility locations. Supports a workforce involved in facilities management and specialized engineering tasks.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns inherent in Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts requires diligent oversight.
- Ensuring consistent service quality across a 5-year period can be challenging.
- Dependency on a single contractor for critical facility operations poses a risk if performance falters.
Positive Signals
- Award to a single entity streamlines management and accountability for facility services.
- Long-term contract provides stability for both the agency and the contractor.
- Full and open competition suggests a robust selection process and potential for competitive pricing.
Sector Analysis
Facilities Support Services is a significant sector within government contracting, encompassing a wide range of activities necessary for the upkeep and operation of federal buildings and infrastructure. This contract, valued at approximately $149 million over five years, represents a substantial portion of spending within this niche for NASA. Comparable contracts often involve large, complex facilities requiring specialized maintenance and operational expertise, similar to those found at a major space flight center.
Small Business Impact
The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no explicit indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. This suggests that the primary awardee, ASRC Federal Facilities Logistics LLC, will likely perform the majority of the work. Further analysis would be needed to determine if any subcontracting opportunities exist within the scope of this large facilities support contract.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by NASA's contracting officers and program managers, who are responsible for monitoring performance, approving invoices, and ensuring compliance with contract terms. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure necessitates close scrutiny of costs incurred by the contractor. Transparency is generally maintained through contract reporting mechanisms, and any significant issues would fall under the purview of NASA's Office of Inspector General.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Operations and Maintenance
- Federal Facilities Management Contracts
- Aerospace Engineering Support Services
- Government Infrastructure Maintenance
Risk Flags
- Cost Overruns Potential (CPFF Structure)
- Performance Degradation Over Long Duration
- Dependency on Single Contractor
Tags
facilities-support, nasa, maryland, definitive-contract, large-contract, full-and-open-competition, cost-plus-fixed-fee, operations-and-maintenance, engineering-services, aerospace, government-contracting
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $149.1 million to ASRC FEDERAL FACILITIES LOGISTICS LLC. THE PURPOSE OF THIS CONTRACT IS TO ACQUIRE REPAIRS, OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE, AND ENGINEERING (ROME) AND RELATED SERVICES FOR THE GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER (GREENBELT AND WALLOPS FLIGHT FACILITY).
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ASRC FEDERAL FACILITIES LOGISTICS LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $149.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-09-15. End: 2028-09-14.
What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services at Goddard Space Flight Center?
Historical spending data for facilities support services at Goddard Space Flight Center would reveal trends in contract values, durations, and the types of services procured over time. Analyzing past contracts can help benchmark the current $149 million award against previous investments. For instance, if similar contracts in the past were significantly smaller or shorter in duration, it might indicate an expansion of services or an increase in costs. Conversely, if this contract represents a continuation of a long-standing, high-value service, it suggests a consistent need. Understanding these patterns is crucial for assessing the long-term financial commitment and the evolution of facility management strategies at the center.
How does the pricing structure (Cost Plus Fixed Fee) compare to other facilities support contracts awarded by NASA or similar agencies?
The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) pricing structure for this $149 million contract means the contractor is reimbursed for allowable costs plus a fixed fee representing profit. This structure is often used when the scope of work is not precisely defined or involves a high degree of uncertainty. Comparing this to other NASA or agency facilities support contracts reveals whether CPFF is the standard for such services or if other structures like Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) are more common. FFP contracts generally offer better price certainty for the government but may be less suitable for complex, evolving requirements. The prevalence of CPFF for similar contracts would indicate industry norms, while its rarity might suggest specific justifications are needed for its use here.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate ASRC Federal Facilities Logistics LLC's performance under this contract?
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for a facilities support contract typically focus on aspects like response times for maintenance requests, completion rates for scheduled preventive maintenance, facility uptime, energy efficiency metrics, and safety incident rates. For this $149 million NASA contract, specific KPIs would be detailed in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). These metrics are crucial for ensuring that ASRC Federal Facilities Logistics LLC meets the required standards for repairs, operations, and maintenance. Regular performance reviews against these KPIs allow NASA to assess value for money, identify areas for improvement, and make informed decisions regarding contract modifications or renewals.
What is the track record of ASRC Federal Facilities Logistics LLC in managing large-scale federal facilities support contracts?
ASRC Federal Facilities Logistics LLC's track record in managing large-scale federal facilities support contracts is a critical factor in assessing the risk and potential success of this $149 million NASA award. Information on their past performance, including contract values, durations, client agencies, and any history of performance issues or awards, provides insight into their capabilities. Agencies typically review past performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS) during the procurement process. A history of successful delivery on similar complex contracts suggests a lower risk of performance failure and a higher likelihood of achieving the contract's objectives for Goddard Space Flight Center.
What are the potential risks associated with the 5-year duration of this contract and the CPFF structure?
The 5-year duration of this $149 million contract, combined with its Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure, presents specific risks. A long duration can lead to complacency or a decline in service quality if not actively managed. The CPFF structure, while flexible, carries the risk of cost escalation if the contractor's spending is not rigorously monitored and controlled by the government. There's also a risk that the fixed fee, agreed upon at the outset, may not adequately reflect the actual effort required over five years, potentially leading to contractor dissatisfaction or attempts to increase scope without commensurate fee adjustments. Effective contract administration and performance management are essential to mitigate these risks.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: 80GSFC22R0011
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Arctic Slope Regional Corporation
Address: 7000 MUIRKIRK MEADOWS DR, BELTSVILLE, MD, 20705
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $320,000,000
Exercised Options: $320,000,000
Current Obligation: $149,096,418
Actual Outlays: $101,417,057
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 135
Total Subaward Amount: $38,593,318
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-09-15
Current End Date: 2028-09-14
Potential End Date: 2028-09-14 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-14
More Contracts from Asrc Federal Facilities Logistics LLC
- 8504864701!pole 35FT Galvanized — $32.0M (Department of Defense)
- Administrative Support Services — $18.1M (Department of Justice)
- Actuator,Electro-Me — $16.1M (Department of Defense)
- NSN: 5820-01-694-9702 Nomenclature: Receiver-Transmitter Subassembly System: Inc 2 - Falcon LOT BUY — $15.0M (Department of Defense)
- Security Administration Support Services — $6.7M (Department of Defense)
View all Asrc Federal Facilities Logistics LLC federal contracts →
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →