NASA awards $45.7M custodial services contract to AHTNA INTEGRATED SERVICES LLC for FY26
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $45,651 ($45.7K)
Contractor: Ahtna Integrated Services LLC
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2025-11-19
End Date: 2026-09-30
Contract Duration: 315 days
Daily Burn Rate: $145/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: PROVIDE CUSTODIAL SUPPORT TO SERVICE REQUESTS IN FY26.
Place of Performance
Location: MOUNTAIN VIEW, SANTA CLARA County, CALIFORNIA, 94035
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $45,651.07 to AHTNA INTEGRATED SERVICES LLC for work described as: PROVIDE CUSTODIAL SUPPORT TO SERVICE REQUESTS IN FY26. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on custodial support, a critical but often overlooked operational necessity. 2. Awarded to a single entity, limiting immediate opportunities for broader market engagement. 3. Performance period spans nearly a full fiscal year, indicating a need for sustained service. 4. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor. 5. Geographic focus is California, suggesting localized service delivery.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $45.7 million for custodial services over approximately one year appears to be within a reasonable range for large-scale facilities management. However, without specific details on the scope of services, square footage covered, or the specific locations within California, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. Benchmarking against similar large federal custodial contracts would provide a clearer picture of whether this represents competitive pricing or a premium for specialized services or contractor capabilities.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was not competed, indicated as 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION'. This suggests that either a specific justification for sole-source award was made, or it was awarded under a specific contract vehicle that limited competition. The lack of open competition means that NASA did not solicit bids from multiple vendors, potentially missing out on cost savings or innovative solutions that could have emerged from a competitive bidding process.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may not have received the benefit of the lowest possible price due to the absence of a competitive bidding process. This could result in a higher overall cost for the custodial services provided.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are NASA facilities in California requiring janitorial and custodial services. Services delivered include maintaining cleanliness and sanitation standards within designated NASA facilities. The geographic impact is concentrated within California, supporting local employment and service provision. Workforce implications include potential job creation for custodial staff employed by AHTNA INTEGRATED SERVICES LLC in California.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition may lead to higher costs for taxpayers.
- Limited transparency into the justification for sole-source award.
- Potential missed opportunities for small businesses to participate.
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract shifts cost risk to the contractor.
- Contract duration ensures continuity of essential custodial services.
- Award to an established entity may indicate confidence in their ability to perform.
Sector Analysis
The custodial services sector is a vital component of facilities management across all industries, including government. Federal spending in this area supports the maintenance and operational readiness of government buildings and installations. While specific market size data for federal custodial contracts is not readily available, it represents a consistent and significant expenditure. This contract fits within the broader facilities support services category, which is a mature market with numerous providers, though specialized government contracts can sometimes favor specific types of firms.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses indicated in the provided data. The award to AHTNA INTEGRATED SERVICES LLC, which is identified as an Alaska Native Corporation (ANC) owned business, suggests a focus on specific socio-economic contracting vehicles. Without explicit set-aside provisions, the direct impact on the broader small business ecosystem for custodial services is likely minimal, though the prime contractor may engage small businesses as subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under NASA's contracting officer and administrative contracting officer, responsible for ensuring performance and compliance with contract terms. Accountability measures are inherent in the Firm Fixed Price structure, where the contractor is responsible for delivering services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is limited by the sole-source nature of the award; however, contract details and performance reports are generally accessible through federal procurement databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Facilities Maintenance Contracts
- Government Janitorial Services
- NASA Operations Support
- Custodial and Sanitation Services
- Facilities Management Contracts
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award may limit price competition.
- Lack of detailed scope of work makes value assessment difficult.
- Performance history of contractor in custodial services not detailed.
Tags
custodial-services, nasa, california, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, sole-source, facilities-management, janitorial-services, ahtna-integrated-services-llc, fy26
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $45,651.07 to AHTNA INTEGRATED SERVICES LLC. PROVIDE CUSTODIAL SUPPORT TO SERVICE REQUESTS IN FY26.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AHTNA INTEGRATED SERVICES LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $45,651.07.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-11-19. End: 2026-09-30.
What is the specific justification for awarding this custodial services contract on a sole-source basis?
The provided data indicates the contract was 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION,' which typically signifies a sole-source award. Federal procurement regulations allow for sole-source awards under specific circumstances, such as when only one responsible source is available or capable of providing the required services, or when a specific socio-economic program dictates such an award (e.g., certain Native American set-asides or specific agency initiatives). Without further documentation or context from NASA, the precise justification remains unclear. However, such justifications must be formally documented and approved, often involving market research to confirm the lack of adequate competition. The absence of a competitive process means taxpayers may not benefit from the potentially lower prices or innovative solutions that a bidding process could yield.
How does the value of this contract compare to similar custodial services contracts awarded by NASA or other federal agencies?
Benchmarking this $45.7 million contract requires detailed comparison points, such as the square footage serviced, the specific types of custodial tasks included (e.g., basic cleaning, deep cleaning, specialized sanitation), the geographic density of facilities, and the contract duration. A contract for nearly a full fiscal year suggests a comprehensive service requirement. Generally, large-scale federal custodial contracts can range from several million to tens of millions of dollars annually, depending on the scale and complexity of the facilities. Without these granular details, it's difficult to definitively state if this contract represents excellent, fair, or questionable value. However, given the Firm Fixed Price structure, the onus is on AHTNA INTEGRATED SERVICES LLC to manage costs effectively to maintain profitability, which can be a positive indicator if performance is met.
What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source award for essential services like custodial support?
The primary risk of a sole-source award for custodial services is the potential for inflated costs due to the lack of competitive pressure. Without multiple bidders vying for the contract, the awarded contractor may not be incentivized to offer the most competitive pricing. Additionally, there's a risk of complacency in service quality or innovation, as the contractor faces no direct competition for future renewals. Taxpayers might bear a higher cost than necessary. Furthermore, sole-source awards can limit opportunities for new or smaller businesses to enter the federal contracting space, potentially hindering market dynamism and diversity. Ensuring robust performance monitoring and clear contract deliverables becomes even more critical in sole-source situations.
What is the track record of AHTNA INTEGRATED SERVICES LLC in performing federal custodial contracts?
AHTNA INTEGRATED SERVICES LLC is part of the Ahtna holding company, which has a history of performing various government contracts, including services and construction. Information regarding their specific track record in federal custodial services would require a deeper dive into contract databases like SAM.gov or FPDS. Generally, companies affiliated with larger Native Corporations often have established processes for managing government contracts and meeting compliance requirements. Assessing their past performance on similar contracts, including client satisfaction, on-time delivery, and adherence to budget, would be crucial for a comprehensive evaluation. Without specific performance data on prior custodial contracts, it's assumed NASA conducted due diligence to ensure capability.
How does the duration of the contract (315 days) impact the overall value and service delivery?
The contract duration of 315 days, covering most of FY26, suggests a need for consistent and ongoing custodial services rather than a short-term or project-specific requirement. This duration allows for the establishment of routines and a stable workforce, potentially leading to more consistent service quality. For the contractor, it provides a predictable revenue stream. From a value perspective, a longer duration can sometimes lead to better pricing if efficiencies are gained over time, although the Firm Fixed Price structure already caps the government's cost. The primary impact is ensuring continuity of essential facility maintenance throughout the fiscal year, minimizing disruptions to NASA's operations.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Services to Buildings and Dwellings › Janitorial Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 110 W 38TH AVE, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99503
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $45,651
Exercised Options: $45,651
Current Obligation: $45,651
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 80GRC025DA001
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-11-19
Current End Date: 2026-09-30
Potential End Date: 2026-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-03
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →