NASA awards $62M R&D contract to Magnix USA for electric aircraft propulsion systems

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $61,992,703 ($62.0M)

Contractor: Magnix USA Inc

Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Start Date: 2021-09-30

End Date: 2026-09-29

Contract Duration: 1,825 days

Daily Burn Rate: $34.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: R&D

Official Description: THE REQUIREMENT IS TO ASSIST NASA IN ACCELERATING THE INTRODUCTION OF MEGAWATT CLASS EAP SYSTEMS INTO FUTURE AIRCRAFT PRODUCTS BY U.S. INDUSTRY. THIS EFFORT HELPS TO IDENTIFY CERTIFICATION GAPS, AND ADDRESS GAPS THROUGH GROUND TEST AND FLIGHT TESTS.

Place of Performance

Location: REDMOND, KING County, WASHINGTON, 98052

State: Washington Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $62.0 million to MAGNIX USA INC for work described as: THE REQUIREMENT IS TO ASSIST NASA IN ACCELERATING THE INTRODUCTION OF MEGAWATT CLASS EAP SYSTEMS INTO FUTURE AIRCRAFT PRODUCTS BY U.S. INDUSTRY. THIS EFFORT HELPS TO IDENTIFY CERTIFICATION GAPS, AND ADDRESS GAPS THROUGH GROUND TEST AND FLIGHT TESTS. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on accelerating the introduction of megawatt-class electric aircraft propulsion (EAP) systems. 2. Effort aims to identify and address certification gaps through ground and flight tests. 3. The contract duration of 5 years suggests a long-term commitment to EAP development. 4. The fixed-price contract type may offer cost certainty for NASA. 5. This award falls under R&D in Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences, a critical sector for innovation. 6. The geographic location in Washington (WA) may indicate a concentration of aerospace R&D activity.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $62 million over five years for advanced aerospace R&D appears reasonable. Benchmarking against similar large-scale, multi-year research initiatives in aerospace, particularly those involving novel propulsion systems, would provide further context. The fixed-price nature of the contract suggests NASA has a clear understanding of the scope, potentially leading to better value if milestones are met efficiently. However, without specific performance metrics or comparable contract data, a definitive value-for-money assessment is challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. With seven bids received, the competition level suggests a healthy interest in this area of research. This broad competition is generally favorable for price discovery and ensures NASA can select the most capable and cost-effective solution. The presence of multiple bidders also reduces the risk of vendor lock-in and encourages innovation.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition for this significant R&D effort is beneficial for taxpayers as it is likely to drive down costs through competitive bidding and encourage the most efficient use of funds.

Public Impact

This contract directly benefits the U.S. aerospace industry by fostering innovation in electric propulsion technology. The services delivered will advance the development and certification of next-generation electric aircraft. The geographic impact is likely concentrated in areas with strong aerospace R&D infrastructure, such as Washington state. This initiative could lead to the creation of specialized jobs in aerospace engineering, research, and testing.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

• The long-term nature of R&D projects can introduce uncertainty in achieving specific technological breakthroughs within the planned timeline.
• Certification of novel propulsion systems is a complex and potentially lengthy process, with risks of unforeseen technical hurdles.
• Reliance on a single contractor for a significant portion of this R&D could pose a risk if the contractor faces financial or operational difficulties.

Positive Signals

• The contract's focus on identifying and addressing certification gaps is a proactive approach to de-risking future EAP system adoption.
• The award to Magnix USA Inc. leverages existing expertise in electric propulsion, potentially accelerating progress.
• The use of ground and flight tests provides a robust methodology for validating technological advancements.

Sector Analysis

The aerospace industry is undergoing a significant transformation driven by the need for more sustainable and efficient aviation. Electric and hybrid-electric propulsion systems are a key area of research and development, with the potential to reduce emissions and operating costs. This contract aligns with NASA's strategic goals to advance aerospace technologies and supports the broader industry's transition towards electrification. The market for advanced aerospace R&D is competitive, with significant investment from both government agencies and private companies.

Small Business Impact

This contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not indicate a specific small business set-aside. While the prime contractor is Magnix USA Inc., there is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses within the provided data. Future analysis could explore subcontracting opportunities to ensure small businesses can participate in this advanced R&D effort.

Oversight & Accountability

NASA's contract oversight mechanisms are expected to be in place to monitor progress, ensure compliance with contract terms, and manage financial expenditures. The agency typically employs program managers and technical experts to oversee R&D contracts. Transparency is generally maintained through reporting requirements and public announcements of significant awards. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

• NASA Electric Aircraft Propulsion Research
• Advanced Air Mobility Initiatives
• Sustainable Aviation Research Programs
• Aerospace Technology Development Contracts

Risk Flags

• Technological Maturity Risk
• Certification Pathway Uncertainty
• Integration Complexity
• Long-term R&D Funding Stability

Tags

research-and-development, nasa, aerospace, electric-propulsion, aircraft-technology, full-and-open-competition, fixed-price, washington, megawatt-class, certification-gaps

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $62.0 million to MAGNIX USA INC. THE REQUIREMENT IS TO ASSIST NASA IN ACCELERATING THE INTRODUCTION OF MEGAWATT CLASS EAP SYSTEMS INTO FUTURE AIRCRAFT PRODUCTS BY U.S. INDUSTRY. THIS EFFORT HELPS TO IDENTIFY CERTIFICATION GAPS, AND ADDRESS GAPS THROUGH GROUND TEST AND FLIGHT TESTS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MAGNIX USA INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $62.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-09-30. End: 2026-09-29.

What is Magnix USA Inc.'s track record in developing and testing electric propulsion systems for aircraft?

Magnix USA Inc. has a notable track record in the development of electric propulsion systems for aviation. They are known for their MagniX electric motors and have been involved in electrifying existing aircraft, such as the Cessna 208 Caravan (e.g., the 'Alice' aircraft). Their work has focused on demonstrating the feasibility and performance of electric powertrains for various aircraft classes. This NASA contract likely builds upon their existing expertise and aims to scale up these capabilities to megawatt-class systems, which are crucial for larger aircraft. Their experience in flight testing and integration of electric propulsion components provides a strong foundation for meeting the objectives of this NASA requirement.

How does the $62 million contract value compare to similar large-scale aerospace R&D investments?

The $62 million contract value for a five-year R&D effort in advanced electric propulsion is substantial but falls within the range of significant government investments in cutting-edge aerospace technology. For context, major aerospace R&D programs, such as those for new engine technologies or advanced airframe designs, often involve hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars over their lifecycle. This NASA contract appears to be a focused investment on a specific, critical component (megawatt-class EAP systems) rather than a full aircraft development program. When compared to other NASA research grants or DoD R&D contracts in similar technological domains, $62 million represents a significant commitment, reflecting the complexity and potential impact of electric aviation.

What are the primary risks associated with developing megawatt-class electric aircraft propulsion systems under this contract?

The primary risks associated with developing megawatt-class electric aircraft propulsion systems under this contract are multifaceted. Technologically, scaling electric motors and power electronics to megawatt levels presents significant engineering challenges related to power density, thermal management, and component reliability. Certification is another major risk; novel propulsion systems require rigorous testing and validation to meet stringent aviation safety standards, and identifying and addressing certification gaps is a complex, iterative process. Furthermore, integration risks exist, as these new systems must be seamlessly incorporated into aircraft designs, requiring close collaboration between propulsion developers and airframe manufacturers. Finally, market adoption risks remain, as the economic viability and operational benefits of these systems need to be proven to airlines and operators.

How might this contract contribute to the overall effectiveness and future of electric aviation?

This contract is poised to significantly contribute to the effectiveness and future of electric aviation by directly addressing critical barriers to adoption. By focusing on the development and certification of megawatt-class EAP systems, NASA is targeting the technology needed for larger, more practical electric aircraft. Identifying and resolving certification gaps proactively is crucial for streamlining the path to market for these new technologies, reducing uncertainty for manufacturers and investors. Successful outcomes from this contract could accelerate the development of regional electric airliners, cargo aircraft, and potentially even urban air mobility solutions, thereby enhancing the overall viability and environmental sustainability of the aviation sector.

What are historical spending patterns for NASA's R&D in advanced propulsion systems?

NASA has a long history of investing in advanced propulsion systems, dating back to the Apollo era and continuing through various research programs for future space exploration and aeronautics. Historically, spending on aeronautics R&D, including advanced propulsion, has fluctuated based on national priorities and technological advancements. While specific figures for 'electric propulsion' R&D are not readily available without deep dives into NASA's budget archives, the agency consistently allocates significant funds to areas like sustainable aviation, hypersonics, and novel engine concepts. The $62 million awarded here represents a substantial, targeted investment in a specific, high-priority area of aeronautics research, reflecting a current strategic focus on electrification within the broader context of historical R&D funding.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › Transportation R&D Services

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: 80AFRC21R0009

Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3301 SEAWAY BLVD STE 130, EVERETT, WA, 98203

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Foreign Owned, Foreign-Owned and U.S.-Incorporated Business, Manufacturer of Goods, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $74,353,783

Exercised Options: $74,353,783

Current Obligation: $61,992,703

Actual Outlays: $58,381,707

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2021-09-30

Current End Date: 2026-09-29

Potential End Date: 2026-09-29 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-05-13

Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts

• International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
• TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
• Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
• Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
• Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)

View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending