NASA awards $6.99M for occupational health services to ServeFed Inc., spanning over 5 years
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $6,991,502 ($7.0M)
Contractor: Servefed Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2020-10-01
End Date: 2026-03-31
Contract Duration: 2,007 days
Daily Burn Rate: $3.5K/day
Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP
Number of Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Healthcare
Official Description: OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE - PHASE-IN THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ATTACHMENT 1, PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT(PWS)
Place of Performance
Location: EDWARDS, KERN County, CALIFORNIA, 93523
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $7.0 million to SERVEFED INC. for work described as: OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE - PHASE-IN THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ATTACHMENT 1, PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT(PWS) Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for the duration and scope of occupational health services. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a potentially competitive bidding process under SAP. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, with performance dependent on contractor execution and oversight. 4. Performance context includes essential health services for NASA personnel. 5. Sector positioning is within healthcare services, specifically occupational health. 6. The contract's firm-fixed-price structure shifts performance risk to the contractor.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $6.99 million over approximately 5.5 years for occupational health services seems within a reasonable range for a federal agency like NASA. Benchmarking against similar contracts for comprehensive occupational health support would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price nature suggests that the contractor has priced the services to cover all anticipated costs and profit, making direct comparison to market rates challenging without detailed service breakdowns.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), suggesting a competitive process for awards below certain thresholds. With 6 bidders, there was a reasonable level of competition, which typically aids in price discovery and achieving fair market value. The specific details of the bidding process and the number of responsive bids would further clarify the extent of competition.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of this award, even under SAP, suggests that taxpayer dollars were likely used efficiently, as multiple firms vied for the contract, potentially driving down costs.
Public Impact
NASA personnel across potentially multiple facilities will benefit from essential occupational health services. Services include health assessments, medical surveillance, and potentially injury/illness management. The geographic impact is primarily focused on NASA facilities in California, where the contractor is located. Workforce implications include the need for qualified medical and administrative staff to fulfill the contract.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if performance work statement is not strictly adhered to.
- Dependence on contractor's ability to maintain qualified medical personnel throughout the contract term.
- Ensuring consistent quality of care across all services provided.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract shifts cost overrun risk to the contractor.
- Multiple bidders suggest a healthy market for these services.
- Long-term contract provides stability for service delivery.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the healthcare services sector, specifically focusing on occupational health. The market for such services is robust, with numerous providers catering to government and commercial clients. NASA's spending on occupational health is a critical component of its overall operational support, ensuring the well-being and readiness of its workforce. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other federal agencies' contracts for similar health support services.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). While ServeFed Inc. may be a small business, the contract itself was competed broadly. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans, but the absence of a small business set-aside suggests that opportunities for small business subcontractors may be limited unless proactively pursued by the prime contractor.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight will likely be managed by NASA contracting officers and program managers responsible for ensuring adherence to the Performance Work Statement (PWS). Accountability measures are built into the firm-fixed-price contract through payment milestones tied to performance. Transparency is generally maintained through federal contract databases, though specific performance metrics and evaluations may not be publicly detailed.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Occupational Health Services
- NASA Health and Medical Services
- Ambulatory Health Care Services Contracts
- Government Employee Health Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for service quality variations.
- Dependence on contractor's staffing stability.
- Ensuring compliance with evolving healthcare regulations.
Tags
healthcare, occupational-health, nasa, california, definitive-contract, firm-fixed-price, competed-under-sap, medium-value, health-services, ambulatory-care
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $7.0 million to SERVEFED INC.. OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE - PHASE-IN THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ATTACHMENT 1, PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT(PWS)
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SERVEFED INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $7.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2020-10-01. End: 2026-03-31.
What is ServeFed Inc.'s track record with federal contracts, particularly in healthcare services?
ServeFed Inc. has a history of federal contracting, with this NASA contract being a significant award. Analyzing their past performance on similar healthcare or occupational health contracts would reveal their reliability, quality of service, and ability to manage federal requirements. A review of contract databases and past performance evaluations (if available) would provide insights into their experience and success rate in delivering services to government agencies. Understanding their financial stability and any past performance issues or awards is crucial for assessing future performance risk.
How does the $6.99M contract value compare to similar occupational health contracts awarded by other federal agencies?
Benchmarking this $6.99 million contract against similar occupational health service contracts awarded by agencies like the Department of Defense, Department of Veterans Affairs, or other civilian agencies is essential for a value-for-money assessment. Factors such as the scope of services (e.g., medical examinations, health screenings, wellness programs, emergency response), duration, geographic coverage, and the specific needs of the agency influence contract pricing. Without detailed service breakdowns and market analysis, it's difficult to definitively state if this price is high or low. However, the firm-fixed-price structure suggests the contractor has factored in all anticipated costs and risks.
What are the primary performance risks associated with this occupational health contract?
The primary performance risks for this occupational health contract revolve around the contractor's ability to consistently deliver high-quality medical services as outlined in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). Key risks include potential staffing shortages of qualified medical professionals, ensuring compliance with all relevant health regulations and standards, managing patient confidentiality, and responding effectively to occupational health emergencies. Furthermore, the firm-fixed-price nature means that unexpected cost increases for the contractor (e.g., rising medical supply costs, increased labor rates) could impact their profitability and potentially their motivation to provide optimal service if not managed carefully. Effective government oversight is critical to mitigate these risks.
How effective are the oversight mechanisms for ensuring the quality and compliance of these occupational health services?
The effectiveness of oversight for this contract hinges on NASA's established procedures for monitoring contractor performance. Typically, federal contracts include provisions for regular performance reviews, site visits, and quality assurance surveillance plans (QASP). The Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) plays a crucial role in day-to-day oversight, ensuring the contractor meets PWS requirements. Compliance with healthcare regulations (e.g., HIPAA) and occupational safety standards is paramount. The firm-fixed-price structure incentivizes the contractor to meet requirements efficiently, but robust government oversight is still necessary to verify the quality and appropriateness of care provided to NASA personnel.
What has been the historical spending trend for occupational health services at NASA or similar agencies?
Analyzing historical spending trends for occupational health services at NASA and comparable federal agencies provides context for the current $6.99 million award. Understanding whether spending has increased, decreased, or remained stable over time can indicate shifts in agency needs, workforce size, or the market for these services. For instance, an increasing trend might suggest a growing need for health support or a rise in service costs. Conversely, a stable or decreasing trend could point to efficient service delivery or a reduction in workforce size. This historical data helps in assessing the long-term financial commitment and identifying potential budget efficiencies.
What is the potential impact of this contract on the small business ecosystem, given it wasn't a set-aside?
Since this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses, its direct impact on the small business ecosystem is limited unless the prime contractor, ServeFed Inc., actively engages small businesses as subcontractors. If ServeFed Inc. is itself a small business, this award represents a significant opportunity for them. However, for the broader small business landscape, the primary impact would stem from subcontracting opportunities. Agencies often encourage prime contractors to utilize small businesses for a portion of the work. Without specific subcontracting goals or reporting, it's difficult to quantify the exact benefit to small businesses in this instance.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Health Care and Social Assistance › Other Ambulatory Health Care Services › All Other Miscellaneous Ambulatory Health Care Services
Product/Service Code: MEDICAL SERVICES › OTHER MEDICAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP
Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION
Solicitation ID: 80AFRC20R0003
Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 4539 METROPOLITAN CT, FREDERICK, MD, 21704
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $7,556,265
Exercised Options: $7,556,265
Current Obligation: $6,991,502
Actual Outlays: $7,251,146
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: PRODUCTS OR SERVICES PURSUANT TO FAR 12.102(F)
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2020-10-01
Current End Date: 2026-03-31
Potential End Date: 2026-03-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-31
More Contracts from Servefed Inc.
- Clinical East Occupational Health Support Services — $58.7M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Clinical West Occupational Health Support Services — $21.4M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Occupational Health Services Support — $8.5M (Department of Health and Human Services)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →