HHS awards $24.4M contract for medical case reviewer services to Dara G. Jamieson, MD PC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $24,375 ($24.4K)

Contractor: Jamieson, Dara G, MD PC

Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services

Start Date: 2026-04-13

End Date: 2027-03-12

Contract Duration: 333 days

Daily Burn Rate: $73/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 145

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: HSB114 C 7172. MEDICAL CASE REVIEWER VICP.

Place of Performance

Location: NEW YORK, NEW YORK County, NEW YORK, 10021

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Health and Human Services obligated $24,375 to JAMIESON, DARA G, MD PC for work described as: HSB114 C 7172. MEDICAL CASE REVIEWER VICP. Key points: 1. Contract awarded for administrative management and general management consulting services. 2. The contract has a duration of 333 days. 3. The contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP). 4. The award is a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call. 5. The contractor is Dara G. Jamieson, MD PC. 6. The contract is firm-fixed-price. 7. The place of performance is New York.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $24.4 million for a period of approximately one year appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized medical case review services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for medical consultants or case reviewers would provide a clearer picture of value for money. The firm-fixed-price structure suggests that cost overruns are the contractor's responsibility, which is a positive indicator for cost control.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

This contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), which typically involves a limited number of bidders compared to full and open competition. While the specific number of bids received is not provided, SAP is designed for smaller procurements where full competition may not be cost-effective. The limited competition could potentially lead to less aggressive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of SAP suggests an effort to streamline the procurement process for a contract of this size, potentially saving administrative costs. However, the limited competition may mean taxpayers are not receiving the absolute lowest price achievable through broader market engagement.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely federal agencies requiring medical case review services, such as those within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The services delivered will involve administrative management and general management consulting related to medical cases. The geographic impact is centered in New York, where the contractor is located and services will be performed. The contract supports a specialized professional service, potentially impacting a small number of highly skilled medical professionals.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited competition under SAP may not yield the best possible pricing for taxpayers.
The specific nature of 'medical case reviewer' services could be subject to interpretation and scope creep if not clearly defined.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract structure shifts cost risk to the contractor.
The contract is awarded to a professional firm, suggesting specialized expertise.
The award falls under a BPA Call, indicating a pre-negotiated framework agreement may be in place.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically administrative and management consulting. The market for medical case review and related consulting services is driven by healthcare regulations, insurance claims processing, and government health programs. Spending in this area is substantial across federal agencies, particularly those involved in healthcare delivery and oversight.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a primary consideration for this specific award, as the 'sb' (small business) flag is false. There is no explicit mention of small business set-asides or subcontracting requirements. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem from this particular contract is likely minimal.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside within the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) at HHS. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract terms, requiring delivery of specified services. Transparency is facilitated through federal procurement databases, though detailed performance metrics may not be publicly available.

Related Government Programs

Medical Consulting Services
Healthcare Administration Support
Federal Health Program Management
Administrative Management Services

Risk Flags

Limited competition may impact price discovery.
Contract performance history for the specific awardee is not detailed.
Scope of 'medical case reviewer' services requires clear definition to prevent creep.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Health and Human Services awarded $24,375 to JAMIESON, DARA G, MD PC. HSB114 C 7172. MEDICAL CASE REVIEWER VICP.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is JAMIESON, DARA G, MD PC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Health and Human Services (Health Resources and Services Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $24,375.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-13. End: 2027-03-12.

What is the track record of Dara G. Jamieson, MD PC in performing similar federal contracts?

Information regarding the specific track record of Dara G. Jamieson, MD PC in performing similar federal contracts is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing past performance evaluations, contract history, and any reported issues or successes on previous government awards. Without this data, it's difficult to ascertain their experience level and reliability for this specific medical case reviewer role. Further investigation into federal contract databases like SAM.gov or FPDS would be necessary to gather this information and evaluate their past performance against requirements and timelines.

How does the value of this contract compare to similar medical case reviewer contracts awarded by the federal government?

Direct comparison of the $24.4 million contract value is challenging without specific details on the scope of work, duration, and complexity of other medical case reviewer contracts. However, given the contract duration of approximately one year (333 days), this represents a significant investment. Contracts for specialized medical expertise can vary widely based on the required qualifications, volume of cases, and specific review criteria. To benchmark effectively, one would need to identify contracts with similar service descriptions, agency, and performance periods, and then analyze their total values and per-diem or per-case rates, adjusting for inflation and market differences.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Potential risks include the contractor's ability to deliver high-quality medical case reviews consistently, potential scope creep if the requirements are not precisely defined, and the possibility of the contractor not meeting performance standards. Mitigation strategies are likely embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract, which incentivizes the contractor to manage costs and adhere to the scope. The government's oversight, through contract administration and performance monitoring, is crucial. The limited competition under SAP might also pose a risk if it leads to suboptimal pricing or a lack of innovative solutions. Clear performance metrics and regular reviews are essential to mitigate these risks.

How effective is the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) in managing contracts for medical case review services?

The effectiveness of HRSA in managing contracts for medical case review services cannot be determined solely from the data of this single award. HRSA's overall effectiveness would be assessed through a broader review of its contract management practices, including its ability to define clear requirements, conduct thorough source selections, monitor contractor performance, and ensure compliance with regulations. Analyzing HRSA's historical contract performance data, audit findings, and stakeholder feedback would provide insights into their proficiency in managing such specialized service contracts.

What are the historical spending patterns for medical case reviewer services within HHS or similar agencies?

Historical spending patterns for medical case reviewer services within HHS or similar agencies would reveal trends in contract values, durations, and the number of awards over time. Analyzing this data could indicate whether spending in this area is increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable. It could also highlight which agencies are the largest purchasers of these services and identify dominant contractors. Understanding these patterns is crucial for budget forecasting, identifying potential consolidation or fragmentation in the market, and assessing the overall investment in medical case review functions.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 145

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 234 E 70TH ST APT 5, NEW YORK, NY, 10021

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $24,375

Exercised Options: $24,375

Current Obligation: $24,375

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 75R60223A00002

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline