Dara G. Jamieson, MD PC awarded $2.4M contract for VICP medical expert services by HHS

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $24,375 ($24.4K)

Contractor: Jamieson, Dara G, MD PC

Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services

Start Date: 2026-04-13

End Date: 2027-03-12

Contract Duration: 333 days

Daily Burn Rate: $73/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 145

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: HSB114 C 7172. VACCINE INJURY COMPENSATION PROGRAM (VICP) MEDICAL EXPERT.

Place of Performance

Location: NEW YORK, NEW YORK County, NEW YORK, 10021

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Health and Human Services obligated $24,375 to JAMIESON, DARA G, MD PC for work described as: HSB114 C 7172. VACCINE INJURY COMPENSATION PROGRAM (VICP) MEDICAL EXPERT. Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable given the specialized nature of medical expert services for vaccine injury claims. 2. Competition dynamics are unclear due to the 'COMPETED UNDER SAP' designation, suggesting potential limitations. 3. Risk indicators are low, with a firm-fixed-price contract and a clear service delivery period. 4. Performance context involves providing critical medical expertise for the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 5. Sector positioning is within healthcare administration and consulting services, supporting a specialized government program.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $2.4 million over approximately 3 years for specialized medical expert services seems within a reasonable range. Benchmarking against similar contracts for medical consultants in government programs would provide a more precise assessment. However, the fixed-price nature suggests that the government has negotiated a set cost for these services, which can be advantageous.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was 'COMPETED UNDER SAP' (Simplified Acquisition Procedures), which typically involves fewer bidders than full and open competition. While this indicates some level of competition, the exact number of bidders and the specific procedures used are not detailed. This procurement method is generally used for smaller dollar value contracts, and its application here warrants further investigation into why it was chosen.

Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition may have resulted in a higher price than if the contract had been fully and openly competed, potentially costing taxpayers more. However, the contract value is relatively modest, so the impact might be limited.

Public Impact

Beneficiaries include individuals seeking compensation for vaccine injuries through the VICP. Services delivered involve expert medical reviews and opinions crucial for adjudicating claims. Geographic impact is national, as the VICP serves individuals across the United States. Workforce implications include the engagement of specialized medical professionals to support the program's operations.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of transparency regarding the specific competition process under SAP.
Potential for higher costs due to limited competition compared to full and open solicitations.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Clear contract duration with defined start and end dates.
Contract awarded to a medical professional (MD PC), indicating specialized expertise.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the healthcare services and administrative consulting sector. The market for specialized medical expertise in government programs like VICP is niche. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve looking at other contracts for medical advisory services within federal agencies, particularly those involved in health claims adjudication or compensation programs. The total value is modest within the broader federal contracting landscape.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem related to set-asides for this particular award. The focus appears to be on securing specialized medical expertise.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and its operating division, the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract, requiring delivery of specified services. Transparency could be enhanced by providing more details on the SAP competition process. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud or mismanagement were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP)
Medical Expert Services Contracts
Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Contracts
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Contracts

Risk Flags

Limited competition due to SAP procurement method.
Potential lack of transparency regarding the specific competition details.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Health and Human Services awarded $24,375 to JAMIESON, DARA G, MD PC. HSB114 C 7172. VACCINE INJURY COMPENSATION PROGRAM (VICP) MEDICAL EXPERT.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is JAMIESON, DARA G, MD PC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Health and Human Services (Health Resources and Services Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $24,375.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-13. End: 2027-03-12.

What is the track record of JAMIESON, DARA G, MD PC with federal contracts?

As of the provided data, JAMIESON, DARA G, MD PC has been awarded this specific contract with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) medical expert services. The data indicates this is a BPA Call award with a duration from April 2026 to March 2027. Further investigation into federal procurement databases like SAM.gov or FPDS would be necessary to ascertain the full extent of their federal contracting history, including past performance, other awards, and any reported issues or successes. Without more historical data, it's difficult to provide a comprehensive assessment of their track record.

How does the contract value compare to similar medical expert services procured by the government?

The contract value of approximately $2.4 million over 333 days (roughly 11 months) for VICP medical expert services is specific to the needs of the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. To benchmark this value, one would need to compare it against other contracts awarded for similar specialized medical advisory or expert witness services within federal agencies, particularly those dealing with health claims, compensation, or litigation support. The 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' NAICS code (541611) is broad, but the specific service description points to a niche requirement. Without access to a detailed database of comparable contracts, it's challenging to definitively state if this represents excellent, fair, or questionable value. However, given the specialized nature and the firm-fixed-price structure, it suggests an attempt at cost control.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

The primary risks associated with this contract include potential delays in service delivery if the contractor faces unforeseen challenges, or if the quality of the expert analysis does not meet the program's standards. Another risk stems from the procurement method ('COMPETED UNDER SAP'), which might imply limited competition, potentially leading to suboptimal pricing or a narrower pool of qualified experts. Mitigation strategies are embedded in the contract structure: the firm-fixed-price nature caps the financial exposure for the government, and the defined contract period (ending March 2027) sets clear performance timelines. The government's oversight by HHS/HRSA is expected to monitor performance and quality, with recourse available for non-performance as per contract terms.

How effective is the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) in delivering its intended services, and how does this contract contribute?

The effectiveness of the VICP itself is a broader program evaluation topic. This contract directly supports the VICP's operational effectiveness by ensuring access to qualified medical experts. These experts are crucial for reviewing petitions, analyzing medical records, and providing opinions on the relationship between vaccinations and alleged injuries. Without timely and accurate expert reviews, the adjudication of claims would be significantly hampered, potentially delaying or denying compensation to eligible individuals. Therefore, this contract is essential for the program's core function of fairly and efficiently processing claims.

What are the historical spending patterns for medical expert services within the VICP or similar HHS programs?

Historical spending patterns for medical expert services within the VICP or similar HHS programs would require a deep dive into historical contract data. This specific contract is a BPA Call, suggesting it might be part of a larger Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract or a framework agreement. Analyzing past awards under the VICP or related HRSA initiatives would reveal trends in contract values, durations, number of contractors utilized, and the average cost per expert engagement. Understanding these patterns is crucial for assessing whether current spending is consistent, increasing, or decreasing, and whether it aligns with program needs and budget allocations over time.

What is the significance of the 'COMPETED UNDER SAP' designation for this contract?

The 'COMPETED UNDER SAP' designation signifies that this contract was procured using Simplified Acquisition Procedures. These procedures are generally intended for purchases below the simplified acquisition threshold (currently $250,000, though specific agency rules may vary slightly) or for certain types of contracts. While the contract value here ($2.4M) seems to exceed the standard SAP threshold, it might fall under specific exceptions or agency-defined thresholds for SAP usage. SAP aims to streamline the procurement process, making it faster and less burdensome than full and open competition. However, it typically involves fewer sources being solicited, potentially limiting price competition and the range of potential offerors compared to larger, more complex procurements.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 145

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 234 E 70TH ST APT 5, NEW YORK, NY, 10021

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $24,375

Exercised Options: $24,375

Current Obligation: $24,375

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 75R60223A00002

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline