HHS awards $458.7M contract to Novitas Solutions for Medicare Administrative Contractor services in Jurisdiction L

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $458,713,459 ($458.7M)

Contractor: Novitas Solutions, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services

Start Date: 2021-08-01

End Date: 2026-07-31

Contract Duration: 1,825 days

Daily Burn Rate: $251.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: A/B MAC JURISDICTION L

Place of Performance

Location: MECHANICSBURG, CUMBERLAND County, PENNSYLVANIA, 17050

State: Pennsylvania Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Health and Human Services obligated $458.7 million to NOVITAS SOLUTIONS, INC. for work described as: A/B MAC JURISDICTION L Key points: 1. Contract value of $458.7 million over its potential 5-year term indicates significant investment in Medicare administration. 2. The contract's cost-plus-award-fee structure incentivizes performance but requires careful monitoring of costs and award criteria. 3. Competition was full and open, suggesting a robust market for these specialized administrative services. 4. The duration of 1825 days (5 years) allows for long-term planning and stability in service delivery. 5. This contract supports the critical function of processing claims and managing benefits for Medicare beneficiaries. 6. Novitas Solutions' role as a Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) is central to the operational efficiency of the Medicare program.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $458.7 million over five years averages to approximately $91.7 million annually. Benchmarking this against other MAC contracts is complex due to varying jurisdictions and service scopes. However, the cost-plus-award-fee (CPAF) pricing structure suggests that while base costs are managed, significant portions are tied to performance metrics, which can lead to good value if performance is high. Without specific performance data or detailed cost breakdowns, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging, but the competitive award process provides some assurance of fair pricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. The presence of multiple bidders typically fosters price discovery and encourages contractors to offer competitive terms. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a healthy level of competition for this essential Medicare administrative function.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by driving down costs and improving service quality through market forces. It ensures that the government is not locked into a single provider and can leverage the best available solutions at a reasonable price.

Public Impact

Beneficiaries of this contract are Medicare beneficiaries within Jurisdiction L, who will receive uninterrupted claims processing and customer service. The services delivered include claims processing, provider enrollment, medical review, and other administrative functions essential for Medicare operations. The geographic impact is focused on Jurisdiction L, covering the specific states or regions assigned to this MAC. The contract supports a workforce involved in healthcare administration, claims processing, and customer support roles.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Potential for cost overruns inherent in Cost Plus Award Fee contracts if performance targets are not met efficiently.
  • Complexity of managing a large-scale administrative contract across a defined jurisdiction requires robust oversight.
  • Dependence on a single contractor for critical Medicare administrative functions in Jurisdiction L.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing and service environment.
  • The Cost Plus Award Fee structure incentivizes high performance and efficiency.
  • Long-term contract duration provides stability for service delivery and beneficiary support.

Sector Analysis

The healthcare administration sector, particularly within government contracting, is characterized by complex regulatory environments and the need for specialized expertise. Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) play a vital role in the operational backbone of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), handling billions of dollars in claims annually. This contract fits within the broader IT and professional services category supporting government health programs. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve looking at other MAC contracts awarded by CMS, which often run into hundreds of millions of dollars over their terms.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate any specific small business set-aside provisions for this contract, nor does it detail subcontracting plans. As a large, comprehensive contract for Medicare administration, it is likely that larger prime contractors would be involved. However, opportunities for small businesses may exist further down the subcontracting chain, particularly for specialized IT support, data analysis, or niche administrative services, though this is not explicitly detailed in the award information.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract is primarily managed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the awarding agency. As a Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract, performance metrics and cost controls are critical components of oversight. The contract likely includes provisions for regular reporting, audits, and reviews to ensure compliance and value. The Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) would also have jurisdiction to investigate potential fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract.

Related Government Programs

  • Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) Program
  • CMS Claims Processing
  • Healthcare IT Services
  • Federal Health Insurance Administration

Risk Flags

  • Cost-Plus Award Fee structure requires diligent oversight to manage costs.
  • Contract duration necessitates ongoing performance monitoring to prevent complacency.
  • Complexity of Medicare administration requires robust contractor capabilities and government oversight.

Tags

healthcare, medicare, cms, definitive-contract, cost-plus-award-fee, full-and-open-competition, department-of-health-and-human-services, centers-for-medicare-and-medicaid-services, novitas-solutions, jurisdiction-l, direct-health-and-medical-insurance-carriers, pennsylvania

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Health and Human Services awarded $458.7 million to NOVITAS SOLUTIONS, INC.. A/B MAC JURISDICTION L

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is NOVITAS SOLUTIONS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Health and Human Services (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $458.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-08-01. End: 2026-07-31.

What is the historical performance record of Novitas Solutions in managing Medicare Administrative Contractor responsibilities?

Novitas Solutions has a significant history of serving as a Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) for CMS. They have previously held contracts for MAC services in various jurisdictions, including Jurisdiction L. Their performance has generally been viewed as satisfactory, meeting the requirements set forth by CMS. However, like any large-scale government contract, there can be periods of scrutiny or specific performance issues that are addressed through contract management and award fee adjustments. Detailed performance reviews are typically internal to CMS and reflected in the award fee determinations, which are not publicly disclosed in detail.

How does the annual cost of this contract compare to the average annual cost of other MAC contracts?

The annual cost for this contract averages approximately $91.7 million ($458.7 million / 5 years). Comparing this directly to other MAC contracts requires careful consideration of the specific jurisdiction's size, beneficiary population, complexity of claims, and the scope of services required. MAC contracts vary significantly in value. Some jurisdictions may have higher annual costs due to larger populations or more complex healthcare landscapes, while others might be lower. Without a detailed breakdown of services and jurisdiction-specific factors for all MACs, a precise benchmark is difficult, but this figure falls within the expected range for a large, multi-state MAC jurisdiction.

What are the primary risk indicators associated with this type of Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract?

The primary risk indicators for a CPAF contract revolve around cost control and performance measurement. A key risk is that the contractor may incur costs that are higher than anticipated if the award fee criteria are not tightly defined or if the government's oversight of allowable costs is insufficient. Another risk is the potential for subjective interpretation of performance metrics, leading to disputes over award fees. For taxpayers, the risk is paying more than necessary if costs escalate without commensurate improvements in service quality or efficiency. Robust government oversight and clearly defined, objective performance standards are crucial to mitigate these risks.

How effective is the full and open competition process in ensuring value for money for Medicare administrative services?

The full and open competition process is generally considered effective in ensuring value for money for Medicare administrative services. By allowing any qualified vendor to bid, it fosters a competitive environment that encourages lower pricing and higher quality service offerings. This process helps prevent monopolies and ensures that CMS selects the contractor that offers the best combination of price and performance. The competitive pressure incentivizes contractors to be efficient and innovative. However, the effectiveness is contingent on the clarity of the solicitation, the evaluation criteria, and the government's ability to accurately assess proposals and manage the resulting contract.

What are the implications of the 5-year contract duration for service continuity and potential contractor complacency?

A 5-year contract duration (1825 days) provides significant stability for both the contractor and the Medicare beneficiaries served. This long-term commitment allows Novitas Solutions to invest in infrastructure, technology, and personnel, ensuring consistent and reliable service delivery. For beneficiaries, it means continuity in claims processing and support without frequent disruptions. However, a long duration can also pose a risk of contractor complacency if not managed proactively. CMS must maintain rigorous oversight, performance monitoring, and regular communication to ensure the contractor remains motivated to perform at a high level throughout the contract term and does not become complacent.

What is the typical annual spending for Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) across all jurisdictions?

Annual spending for Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) across all jurisdictions can vary significantly based on the size and complexity of each jurisdiction. While specific aggregate data fluctuates yearly, the total annual budget allocated to MAC operations by CMS typically runs into the billions of dollars when all jurisdictions are considered. Individual MAC contracts, like the one awarded to Novitas Solutions for Jurisdiction L, often represent significant portions of this total, with annual values frequently in the tens to over one hundred million dollars per contract, depending on the specific MAC jurisdiction's scope and workload.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Finance and InsuranceInsurance CarriersDirect Health and Medical Insurance Carriers

Product/Service Code: SOCIAL SERVICESSOCIAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: 75FCMC20R0008

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2020 TECHNOLOGY PKWY, STE 100, MECHANICSBURG, PA, 17050

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $789,820,811

Exercised Options: $563,673,246

Current Obligation: $458,713,459

Actual Outlays: $370,775,380

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 48

Total Subaward Amount: $38,593,594

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2021-08-01

Current End Date: 2026-07-31

Potential End Date: 2028-07-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-03-19

More Contracts from Novitas Solutions, Inc.

View all Novitas Solutions, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Health and Human Services Contracts

View all Department of Health and Human Services contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending