HHS awards $3.77M contract for administrative management consulting services to Organizational Development Resource Group, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,773,060 ($3.8M)

Contractor: Organizational Development Resource Group, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services

Start Date: 2023-04-01

End Date: 2027-03-31

Contract Duration: 1,460 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: REGION 1 - CUSTOMER SERVICE IMPROVEMENT AND PROJECT (CSIP)

Place of Performance

Location: BOSTON, SUFFOLK County, MASSACHUSETTS, 02203

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Health and Human Services obligated $3.8 million to ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT RESOURCE GROUP, LLC for work described as: REGION 1 - CUSTOMER SERVICE IMPROVEMENT AND PROJECT (CSIP) Key points: 1. Contract awarded via BPA Call under a GSA MAS contract, indicating a pre-competed framework. 2. The contract is for administrative management and general management consulting services. 3. The duration of the contract is 4 years, with a firm fixed price. 4. The awardee, Organizational Development Resource Group, LLC, is a single entity. 5. The contract was awarded through full and open competition. 6. The contract is not set aside for small businesses.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $3.77 million over four years for administrative management consulting services appears to be within a reasonable range for this type of engagement. Benchmarking against similar contracts for consulting services within HHS or other federal agencies would provide a more precise assessment of value for money. The firm fixed-price structure helps control costs, but the overall value is contingent on the quality and impact of the services delivered.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, likely leveraging an existing GSA Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) BPA Call. This indicates that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid on the underlying MAS contract, and then this specific call was likely competed among those eligible. The level of competition for the initial MAS award is generally robust, which should translate to competitive pricing for this call.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to better pricing and a wider selection of qualified contractors.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and its various operating divisions. The services delivered are expected to improve administrative management and general management processes within the agency. The geographic impact is primarily within the agency's operational locations, with potential for remote work. Workforce implications may include support for internal staff through improved processes and potentially direct engagement with consultants.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if project objectives are not clearly defined and managed.
Dependence on contractor expertise may limit internal knowledge transfer if not actively managed.
Ensuring alignment with evolving agency priorities throughout the contract term.

Positive Signals

Awarded under a pre-competed GSA MAS BPA Call, suggesting a streamlined and potentially cost-effective procurement.
Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the agency.
The contractor is likely experienced in providing administrative management consulting services.

Sector Analysis

The administrative management and general management consulting services sector is a significant part of the federal procurement landscape. Agencies frequently engage consultants to improve efficiency, implement new strategies, and manage complex projects. Spending in this category is driven by the need for specialized expertise that may not be available internally or requires an objective external perspective. Benchmarks for similar consulting contracts vary widely based on scope, duration, and contractor expertise.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. The awardee is Organizational Development Resource Group, LLC. Further analysis would be needed to determine if the prime contractor has a history of subcontracting with small businesses on other contracts.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight will likely be managed by the contracting officer's representative (COR) within the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources at HHS. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of financial oversight. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases like FPDS.gov, where contract awards are reported.

Related Government Programs

HHS Management and Administrative Support Services
Federal Consulting Services
GSA MAS Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for undefined scope creep
Lack of specific performance metrics in summary data

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Health and Human Services awarded $3.8 million to ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT RESOURCE GROUP, LLC. REGION 1 - CUSTOMER SERVICE IMPROVEMENT AND PROJECT (CSIP)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT RESOURCE GROUP, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Health and Human Services (Office of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-04-01. End: 2027-03-31.

What is the track record of Organizational Development Resource Group, LLC in performing similar federal contracts?

A review of federal procurement data would be necessary to fully assess the track record of Organizational Development Resource Group, LLC. This would involve examining past contract awards, performance evaluations (if publicly available), and any history of contract modifications or disputes. Understanding their experience with similar administrative management and general management consulting services, particularly within large federal agencies like HHS, would provide insight into their capability to successfully execute this current contract. Without specific past performance data, it is difficult to definitively assess their reliability and expertise.

How does the total contract value compare to similar administrative management consulting contracts awarded by HHS or other agencies?

The total contract value of $3.77 million over four years for administrative management and general management consulting services needs to be benchmarked against comparable federal contracts. Factors such as the specific services required, the complexity of the agency's needs, the duration of the engagement, and the experience level of the contractor all influence pricing. A preliminary assessment suggests the value is moderate for a four-year federal consulting engagement. However, a detailed comparison with contracts for similar scope and scale within HHS or across other agencies would be required to determine if this represents excellent, fair, or questionable value for money.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or deliverables expected under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or detailed deliverables for this contract. Typically, for administrative management and general management consulting services, KPIs might include improvements in process efficiency, cost savings achieved, successful implementation of new management strategies, enhanced organizational effectiveness, or timely completion of project milestones. The specific metrics would be defined in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW). Without access to the SOW, a thorough assessment of performance expectations and how success will be measured is not possible.

What is the historical spending pattern for administrative management consulting services at HHS?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for administrative management consulting services at HHS would provide context for this $3.77 million award. This involves examining aggregate spending data over several fiscal years to identify trends, major contract vehicles used, and the typical range of contract values. Understanding whether this award represents an increase, decrease, or continuation of previous spending levels can indicate shifts in agency priorities or resource allocation. It also helps in identifying if certain types of consulting services are consistently procured or if there are significant fluctuations.

What is the potential impact of this contract on the agency's internal capacity for management consulting?

This contract's impact on HHS's internal capacity for management consulting depends on how the services are structured and managed. If the consultants work collaboratively with internal staff, focusing on knowledge transfer and capacity building, it could enhance the agency's long-term capabilities. Conversely, if the engagement is primarily task-oriented with limited interaction, it might not significantly bolster internal expertise. The firm fixed-price nature suggests a defined scope, which could limit opportunities for extensive internal training unless explicitly included. The agency's strategy for leveraging the consultants' work will determine the net effect on its internal capacity.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1201 WILSON BLVD, ARLINGTON, VA, 22209

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,773,060

Exercised Options: $3,773,060

Current Obligation: $3,773,060

Actual Outlays: $2,547,680

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 75ACF122A00002

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline