DHS awards $2.05M contract for Alameda housing construction, highlighting limited competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,046,927 ($2.0M)

Contractor: Advanced Technology Construction Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2026-01-09

End Date: 2026-07-21

Contract Duration: 193 days

Daily Burn Rate: $10.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: MAJOR M AND R EXTERIORS MARINA VILLAGE HOUSING PHASE II ALAMEDA, CALIFORNIA

Place of Performance

Location: ALAMEDA, ALAMEDA County, CALIFORNIA, 94501

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $2.0 million to ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION for work described as: MAJOR M AND R EXTERIORS MARINA VILLAGE HOUSING PHASE II ALAMEDA, CALIFORNIA Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable given the scope of construction services. 2. Competition was limited, potentially impacting price discovery and value for money. 3. Contract duration is relatively short, suggesting a focused project phase. 4. Project is part of a larger housing initiative, indicating ongoing investment. 5. Fixed-price contract type shifts risk to the contractor. 6. Geographic concentration in California may reflect regional needs or existing infrastructure.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $2.05 million for housing construction in Alameda, California, needs further benchmarking against similar projects. While a firm fixed-price contract is standard, the limited competition raises questions about whether the government secured the best possible price. Without more comparable data on construction costs for similar housing phases in the region, a definitive value-for-money assessment is challenging. The contract's duration of approximately six months suggests a specific phase of work, which could influence the overall cost-effectiveness.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

This contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' indicating that while the initial solicitation was broad, specific sources were later excluded. The data shows 5 bids were received, suggesting some level of competition, but the exclusion of sources implies a narrower field than initially intended. This type of competition can sometimes lead to higher prices if the excluded sources represent significant market players or if the remaining bidders face less pressure to offer competitive rates.

Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition may mean taxpayers did not benefit from the lowest possible price that a fully open and unrestricted bidding process might have yielded.

Public Impact

Service members and their families stationed in Alameda, California, are the primary beneficiaries through improved housing. The contract delivers construction services for Phase II of the Marina Village Housing project. The geographic impact is localized to Alameda, California. The project will likely support local construction jobs and related industries in the region.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited competition could result in higher costs for taxpayers.
Lack of transparency in source exclusion raises concerns about fairness.
Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen issues arise, despite fixed-price contract.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract shifts cost risk to the contractor.
Project addresses critical housing needs for military personnel.
Contract award indicates progress on the Marina Village Housing initiative.

Sector Analysis

The construction sector is a significant area of federal spending, encompassing a wide range of projects from infrastructure to facilities. This contract falls under commercial and institutional building construction, a segment that supports government operations and personnel welfare. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other housing construction or renovation projects for military installations, considering regional labor and material costs. The market size for federal construction is substantial, with numerous contractors vying for opportunities.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate if this contract included small business set-asides or subcontracting requirements. Without this information, it's difficult to assess the direct impact on the small business ecosystem. However, the prime contractor, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, may engage small businesses for specialized services or materials, which would indirectly benefit them. Further investigation into subcontracting plans would be necessary for a comprehensive analysis.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the U.S. Coast Guard, a component of the Department of Homeland Security. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm fixed-price contract structure, which obligates the contractor to deliver the specified work within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases, though the specifics of the 'exclusion of sources' process may have limited public visibility. The Inspector General for DHS would have jurisdiction over any potential fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract.

Related Government Programs

Military Housing Construction
Department of Homeland Security Facilities
U.S. Coast Guard Infrastructure Projects
Alameda Naval Air Station Redevelopment

Risk Flags

Limited competition may lead to suboptimal pricing.
Lack of transparency regarding source exclusion.
Potential for schedule delays or cost overruns if unforeseen site conditions arise.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $2.0 million to ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION. MAJOR M AND R EXTERIORS MARINA VILLAGE HOUSING PHASE II ALAMEDA, CALIFORNIA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (U.S. Coast Guard).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-01-09. End: 2026-07-21.

What is the track record of ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION with federal contracts, particularly with the U.S. Coast Guard or DHS?

A review of federal contract databases would be necessary to fully assess ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION's track record. Key metrics to examine include the number of previous awards, contract values, performance ratings (if available), and any history of disputes or terminations. Understanding their past performance, especially on similar construction projects for maritime or defense-related agencies, would provide crucial context for evaluating their capability and reliability on this specific Marina Village Housing project. Without this data, it's difficult to gauge their experience level and potential risks associated with awarding them this contract.

How does the $2.05 million contract value compare to similar housing construction projects for military families in California or the West Coast?

Benchmarking this $2.05 million contract against similar projects requires access to a database of comparable federal housing construction contracts, ideally within the same geographic region (California/West Coast) and for similar types of family housing units. Factors such as square footage per unit, amenities included, and the specific phase of construction (e.g., new build vs. renovation) are critical for a fair comparison. If this contract represents a significantly higher or lower cost per unit or per square foot compared to benchmarks, it would indicate potential issues with pricing, scope, or the effectiveness of the competition process. A preliminary assessment suggests the value is within a plausible range for such projects, but detailed comparative analysis is needed.

What specific criteria led to the exclusion of certain sources in the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' process?

The criteria for excluding sources in a 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' award are typically based on specific technical requirements, past performance issues, or other pre-defined criteria outlined in the solicitation. Agencies exclude sources when they determine that only a limited number of responsible sources can meet the government's needs, often due to unique capabilities or specialized requirements. Without access to the specific justification documents or the original solicitation details, it is impossible to determine the exact reasons for excluding certain bidders. This lack of transparency can be a concern for ensuring maximum competition and fair opportunity.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this construction contract, and how will the U.S. Coast Guard measure project success?

Key performance indicators for this construction contract would likely include adherence to the project schedule, completion of work according to specified quality standards and building codes, and staying within the firm fixed-price budget. The U.S. Coast Guard would typically monitor progress through regular site inspections, review of contractor submittals (e.g., material samples, design revisions), and milestone completion reports. Success would be measured by the timely delivery of safe, habitable housing units that meet all contractual requirements and specifications, ultimately contributing to the quality of life for service members and their families stationed at the facility.

What is the historical spending trend for housing construction and renovation projects by the U.S. Coast Guard in the last five fiscal years?

Analyzing the historical spending trends for housing construction and renovation by the U.S. Coast Guard over the last five fiscal years would provide valuable context for this $2.05 million award. This would involve aggregating data on all similar contracts awarded by the Coast Guard during that period. Key insights would include the average contract value, the frequency of such awards, and whether spending has been increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable. Understanding these trends can help identify patterns in investment, potential budget fluctuations, and the overall priority placed on improving military housing infrastructure by the agency.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3828 E PORTLAND AVE, TACOMA, WA, 98404

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, HUBZone Firm, Minority Owned Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,046,927

Exercised Options: $2,046,927

Current Obligation: $2,046,927

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 70Z08818DPQQ20200

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline