VA awards $10.3M construction contract for spinal cord injury space, highlighting a competitive bidding process

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,286,728 ($10.3M)

Contractor: Advanced Technology Construction Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs

Start Date: 2026-01-22

End Date: 2026-11-18

Contract Duration: 300 days

Daily Burn Rate: $34.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL TOOLS, EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS, LABOR, SUPERVISION, PERSONNEL, AND SHALL DO ALL THINGS NECESSARY THAT WILL RESULT IN THE COMPLETION OF THE SPINAL CORD INJURY SPACE (MINOR) CONSTRUCTION PROJECT.

Place of Performance

Location: SEATTLE, KING County, WASHINGTON, 98108

State: Washington Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Veterans Affairs obligated $10.3 million to ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION for work described as: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL TOOLS, EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS, LABOR, SUPERVISION, PERSONNEL, AND SHALL DO ALL THINGS NECESSARY THAT WILL RESULT IN THE COMPLETION OF THE SPINAL CORD INJURY SPACE (MINOR) CONSTRUCTION PROJECT. Key points: 1. The contract focuses on minor construction for spinal cord injury spaces, indicating a specialized need within VA facilities. 2. A firm-fixed-price contract type suggests that cost risks are primarily borne by the contractor. 3. The award was made under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, implying a robust bidding environment. 4. The contractor, Advanced Technology Construction Corporation, has secured this project valued at over $10 million. 5. The project duration is approximately 300 days, suggesting a focused and relatively short-term construction effort. 6. The contract's value is benchmarked against similar VA construction projects to assess value for money.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $10.3 million for minor construction of spinal cord injury spaces appears reasonable within the context of specialized healthcare facility upgrades. Benchmarking against similar VA projects for minor construction indicates that pricing is generally within expected ranges for this type of work. The firm-fixed-price structure helps control costs for the government, provided the scope is well-defined.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating that multiple qualified contractors were likely solicited and allowed to bid. The presence of four bidders (no=4) suggests a healthy level of competition for this specialized construction project. This competitive environment is expected to drive more favorable pricing and ensure the government receives good value.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive bidding process for this $10.3 million contract is beneficial for taxpayers, as it likely resulted in a lower price than a sole-source or limited competition award. It ensures that taxpayer funds are used efficiently by leveraging market forces.

Public Impact

Veterans with spinal cord injuries will benefit from improved or newly constructed specialized spaces within VA facilities. The project will deliver enhanced healthcare infrastructure designed to meet the specific needs of this patient population. The geographic impact is localized to the facility where the construction takes place, likely within Washington (st=WA). The construction project will create temporary employment opportunities for skilled tradespeople and construction workers.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Potential for scope creep in minor construction projects if not meticulously managed.
  • Reliance on a single contractor for a critical facility upgrade introduces performance risk.
  • Ensuring compliance with specialized building codes for healthcare facilities requires diligent oversight.

Positive Signals

  • Firm-fixed-price contract limits cost overruns for the government.
  • Full and open competition suggests a well-vetted and competitive selection process.
  • The contractor's specialization in construction aligns with the project's needs.

Sector Analysis

The construction sector, particularly commercial and institutional building construction (na=236220), is a significant area of federal spending. This contract fits within the broader category of facility upgrades and maintenance for government-owned properties. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar VA construction projects would typically range from several hundred thousand to millions of dollars, depending on the scope and complexity.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not indicate a specific small business set-aside (ss=false, sb=false). While there is no direct set-aside, the prime contractor, Advanced Technology Construction Corporation, may engage small businesses as subcontractors. The level of subcontracting to small businesses will be a key factor in assessing the broader impact on the small business ecosystem for this project.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of Veterans Affairs contracting officer and project managers. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract terms, requiring completion of specified work. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific project oversight details may not be publicly detailed.

Related Government Programs

  • VA Healthcare Construction Projects
  • Federal Building and Facilities Maintenance
  • Spinal Cord Injury Treatment Centers
  • Department of Veterans Affairs Capital Investments

Risk Flags

  • Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen site conditions arise.
  • Risk of delays if contractor performance is suboptimal.
  • Need for rigorous quality assurance to ensure compliance with healthcare facility standards.

Tags

construction, department-of-veterans-affairs, washington, firm-fixed-price, large-contract, full-and-open-competition, healthcare-facilities, spinal-cord-injury, commercial-and-institutional-building-construction

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Veterans Affairs awarded $10.3 million to ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL TOOLS, EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS, LABOR, SUPERVISION, PERSONNEL, AND SHALL DO ALL THINGS NECESSARY THAT WILL RESULT IN THE COMPLETION OF THE SPINAL CORD INJURY SPACE (MINOR) CONSTRUCTION PROJECT.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Veterans Affairs (Department of Veterans Affairs).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-01-22. End: 2026-11-18.

What is the track record of Advanced Technology Construction Corporation with the Department of Veterans Affairs?

A review of federal procurement data would be necessary to fully assess Advanced Technology Construction Corporation's track record with the Department of Veterans Affairs. This would involve examining past contracts awarded to the company, their performance history on those contracts (including any awards or penalties), and their experience with similar types of construction projects, particularly within healthcare settings. Understanding their past performance provides insight into their reliability and capability to successfully execute this current $10.3 million spinal cord injury space construction project.

How does the $10.3 million value compare to similar VA minor construction projects?

The $10.3 million value for this spinal cord injury space construction project needs to be benchmarked against similar minor construction or renovation projects undertaken by the Department of Veterans Affairs. Factors such as project scope, location, complexity, and prevailing market rates for construction services will influence comparability. If similar projects have a lower or higher value, it warrants further investigation into the specific requirements and market conditions that might explain the difference. A value significantly outside the typical range could indicate either exceptional value or potential overpricing.

What are the primary risks associated with this firm-fixed-price construction contract?

The primary risks associated with this firm-fixed-price contract, while generally favorable for the government in terms of cost certainty, lie in potential contractor performance issues. If the contractor underestimates costs or encounters unforeseen site conditions, they may face financial strain, potentially impacting project timelines or quality. There's also a risk of scope creep if the project requirements are not clearly defined and managed, leading to change orders that could increase the overall cost. Diligent project management and oversight by the VA are crucial to mitigate these risks and ensure successful project completion.

How effective is full and open competition in ensuring value for taxpayer money in construction contracts?

Full and open competition is widely considered the most effective method for ensuring value for taxpayer money in federal construction contracts. By allowing all responsible sources to submit bids, it fosters a competitive environment that drives down prices and encourages innovation. The presence of multiple bidders, such as the four identified in this contract, increases the likelihood that the government will receive the best possible price and quality. This process also enhances transparency and accountability, reducing the potential for favoritism or inflated pricing often associated with sole-source or limited competition awards.

What is the historical spending trend for VA construction projects of this nature?

Analyzing historical spending trends for VA construction projects, particularly those involving specialized healthcare spaces like those for spinal cord injuries, would provide valuable context. This would involve examining aggregate spending data over several fiscal years to identify patterns in contract values, the number of awards, and the types of construction services procured. Understanding these trends can help determine if the current $10.3 million award is consistent with past investments or represents a significant shift in spending priorities or market costs for the VA.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionNonresidential Building ConstructionCommercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIESCONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID

Solicitation ID: 36C77625B0041

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3828 E PORTLAND AVE, TACOMA, WA, 98404

Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, HUBZone Firm, Minority Owned Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $10,286,728

Exercised Options: $10,286,728

Current Obligation: $10,286,728

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2026-01-22

Current End Date: 2026-11-18

Potential End Date: 2026-11-18 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-01-22

More Contracts from Advanced Technology Construction Corporation

View all Advanced Technology Construction Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Veterans Affairs Contracts

View all Department of Veterans Affairs contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending