DHS Coast Guard awards $27.4M for Alaska base operations, with a 316-day duration

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $27,420,346 ($27.4M)

Contractor: SIX Mile Nika JV, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2025-08-18

End Date: 2026-06-30

Contract Duration: 316 days

Daily Burn Rate: $86.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: BASE OPERATIONS AND SUPPORT SERVICES, ORDERING PERIOD #2 STANDING WORK AUGUST 18, 2025 - JUNE 30, 2026

Place of Performance

Location: KODIAK, KODIAK ISLAND County, ALASKA, 99619

State: Alaska Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $27.4 million to SIX MILE NIKA JV, LLC for work described as: BASE OPERATIONS AND SUPPORT SERVICES, ORDERING PERIOD #2 STANDING WORK AUGUST 18, 2025 - JUNE 30, 2026 Key points: 1. The contract value represents a significant investment in maintaining essential operational capabilities for the U.S. Coast Guard in Alaska. 2. Competition dynamics for this contract are noted as 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' suggesting a broad but potentially specialized bidder pool. 3. The contract's duration of 316 days indicates a focused, short-term need for base operations support. 4. The fixed-price contract type aims to provide cost certainty for the government. 5. The award to SIX MILE NIKA JV, LLC highlights the role of specific joint ventures in fulfilling specialized federal service needs. 6. The geographic focus on Alaska (AK) underscores the unique logistical and operational challenges in remote regions.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The awarded amount of $27.4 million for base operations and support services over approximately 10.5 months appears reasonable given the specialized nature of supporting Coast Guard facilities in a remote location like Alaska. Benchmarking against similar contracts for remote base support is challenging due to unique environmental and logistical factors. However, the contract's fixed-price nature suggests an expectation of defined costs. The reported base contract value of $8.68 million for the prior period provides some context, indicating a potential increase in scope or cost for this ordering period.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' This indicates that while the competition was intended to be open, certain sources were excluded, potentially due to specific qualifications, past performance, or other criteria deemed necessary for this particular requirement. The exact number of bidders is not specified, but the exclusion of sources suggests a more curated selection process than a completely unrestricted open competition.

Taxpayer Impact: While the competition was not fully unrestricted, the 'full and open' aspect suggests multiple qualified bidders likely participated, which generally aids in price discovery and can lead to more competitive pricing for taxpayers compared to sole-source awards.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Coast Guard personnel and operations in Alaska, ensuring continuity of essential services. Services delivered include base operations and support, crucial for maintaining readiness and functionality of Coast Guard installations. The geographic impact is concentrated in Alaska, supporting critical maritime security and safety missions in a challenging environment. Workforce implications may include direct employment by the contractor and potential indirect support roles within the local Alaskan economy.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for increased costs if excluded sources were highly competitive.
Dependence on a single joint venture for critical base operations.
Geographic isolation of Alaska may present logistical and cost challenges not fully captured in the base price.

Positive Signals

Award to a joint venture may foster specialized capabilities and local economic participation.
Fixed-price contract provides cost predictability.
Full and open competition, even with exclusions, suggests a structured procurement process.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a broad category encompassing a wide range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of government facilities. The market for such services is substantial, driven by the government's extensive real estate portfolio. Contracts like this are essential for ensuring the operational readiness of critical infrastructure, particularly in remote or challenging environments like Alaska, where specialized logistics and support are paramount. Benchmarking is difficult due to the unique nature of supporting military and security installations.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a primary set-aside criterion for this specific award. Therefore, the direct impact on small businesses through set-asides is likely minimal. However, the prime contractor, SIX MILE NIKA JV, LLC, being a joint venture, might involve small business participation within its structure or through subcontracting opportunities, though this is not explicitly detailed in the provided data. Further analysis would be needed to determine subcontracting plans and their impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the U.S. Coast Guard's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are embedded within the contract terms, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any issues of fraud, waste, or abuse arise during the contract performance period.

Related Government Programs

Base Operations Support Services
Facilities Maintenance Contracts
Department of Homeland Security Contracts
U.S. Coast Guard Support Contracts
Remote Operations Support

Risk Flags

Potential for performance issues due to contractor's JV status.
Logistical challenges in remote Alaskan environment.
Limited competition pool due to source exclusions.
Dependence on specific contractor for critical services.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $27.4 million to SIX MILE NIKA JV, LLC. BASE OPERATIONS AND SUPPORT SERVICES, ORDERING PERIOD #2 STANDING WORK AUGUST 18, 2025 - JUNE 30, 2026

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SIX MILE NIKA JV, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (U.S. Coast Guard).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $27.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-08-18. End: 2026-06-30.

What is the track record of SIX MILE NIKA JV, LLC in performing similar base operations and support services for federal agencies?

Information regarding the specific track record of SIX MILE NIKA JV, LLC in performing base operations and support services is not detailed in the provided data. As a joint venture, its performance history may be a composite of its member companies or specific to projects undertaken under the JV's banner. A thorough review of past performance evaluations, contract awards, and any documented issues or successes would be necessary to fully assess their capabilities and reliability for this critical Coast Guard contract. Without this specific data, it's difficult to provide a definitive assessment of their track record.

How does the awarded price compare to similar base operations contracts in remote or challenging environments?

Directly comparing the $27.4 million award for 316 days to similar contracts is challenging due to the unique environmental, logistical, and operational complexities inherent in supporting U.S. Coast Guard facilities in Alaska. Factors such as extreme weather, limited infrastructure, and specialized personnel requirements significantly influence costs. While the contract is fixed-price, suggesting cost certainty, the benchmark value needs to account for these Alaskan-specific variables. The prior ordering period's base value of $8.68 million offers a limited comparison point, suggesting potential scope changes or market adjustments.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, considering the contractor and the service type?

Key risks include potential performance issues due to the contractor's specific experience as a joint venture, especially if it's a newer entity. The remote Alaskan location presents significant logistical challenges, increasing the risk of delays, cost overruns (despite the fixed-price nature, unforeseen circumstances can arise), and difficulties in accessing necessary resources or personnel. Furthermore, the 'Exclusion of Sources' in the competition could indicate a limited pool of highly specialized contractors, potentially increasing reliance on a single entity and limiting recourse if performance falters. Ensuring consistent service delivery in harsh conditions is also a critical risk factor.

How effective is the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method in ensuring value for money for this type of specialized service?

This competition method aims to balance broad market access with the need for specific capabilities. By excluding certain sources, the government likely targeted contractors with proven expertise in remote base operations or specific security clearances. While this can lead to a more qualified bidder pool and potentially better technical solutions, it might also limit the number of competitors, potentially impacting price competitiveness compared to a truly unrestricted open competition. The effectiveness in ensuring value for money hinges on whether the exclusions were justified by genuine capability requirements and if sufficient qualified bidders remained to foster meaningful price negotiation.

What is the historical spending trend for base operations and support services by the U.S. Coast Guard in Alaska?

Analyzing historical spending trends for U.S. Coast Guard base operations and support services specifically in Alaska requires access to detailed historical contract data beyond the provided snippet. This contract represents a single ordering period. To understand trends, one would need to examine multiple contracts over several fiscal years, looking at total obligated amounts, contract types, and awarded contractors for similar services in the Alaskan region. This would reveal patterns of spending, identify key service providers, and highlight any significant fluctuations or increases in demand and cost over time.

What are the implications of the fixed-price contract type on cost control and contractor risk for this base operations contract?

A Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract type places the primary risk of cost overruns on the contractor. This incentivizes the contractor, SIX MILE NIKA JV, LLC, to manage its costs efficiently and accurately estimate expenses for base operations in Alaska. For the government, FFP provides budget certainty, as the price is set upfront. However, if the contractor underestimated costs due to unforeseen challenges in the remote environment, they might face financial strain, potentially impacting performance or leading to requests for contract modifications. Conversely, if the contractor accurately priced or underestimated, the government secures a predictable cost for essential services.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Gana-A' YOO, Limited

Address: 3900 C ST STE 100, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99503

Business Categories: Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, SBA Certified 8 a Joint Venture, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $27,420,346

Exercised Options: $27,420,346

Current Obligation: $27,420,346

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 5

Total Subaward Amount: $661,745

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 70Z08424DKODI0002

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline