DHS Coast Guard awards $7.9M contract for triennial facility assessments to Transystems Corporation

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $7,935,618 ($7.9M)

Contractor: Transystems Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2025-12-15

End Date: 2026-12-15

Contract Duration: 365 days

Daily Burn Rate: $21.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: THIS IS A REQUIREMENT FOR FACILITY ASSESSMENT ON A TRIENNIAL BASIS. TECHNICAL RESULTS ENTERED INTO BUILDER DATABASE TO IMPROVE RISK MANAGEMENT ACROSS BLDG PORTFOLIO. HELPS REAL-TIME EQUIPMENT INVENTORY + LIFE-CYCLE MANAGEMENT.

Place of Performance

Location: MIAMI, KANAWHA County, WEST VIRGINIA, 25134

State: West Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $7.9 million to TRANSYSTEMS CORPORATION for work described as: THIS IS A REQUIREMENT FOR FACILITY ASSESSMENT ON A TRIENNIAL BASIS. TECHNICAL RESULTS ENTERED INTO BUILDER DATABASE TO IMPROVE RISK MANAGEMENT ACROSS BLDG PORTFOLIO. HELPS REAL-TIME EQUIPMENT INVENTORY + LIFE-CYCLE MANAGEMENT. Key points: 1. Contract supports critical risk management and life-cycle planning for the building portfolio. 2. Focus on technical results entered into the Builder database for improved asset management. 3. Enhances real-time equipment inventory and life-cycle management capabilities. 4. The contract duration is one year, with a firm-fixed-price structure. 5. Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 6. The contract value is approximately $7.9 million, with a per-diem cost of $21,741.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $7.9 million for a one-year facility assessment service appears reasonable given the scope of improving risk management and asset inventory across a building portfolio. Benchmarking against similar triennial assessment contracts is difficult without more specific service details, but the per-diem cost of $21,741 suggests a significant undertaking. The firm-fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government.

Cost Per Unit: $21,741 per day

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this procurement method generally fosters price discovery and encourages competitive pricing. The government likely sought the best value through a structured evaluation process.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it typically leads to more competitive pricing and a wider range of innovative solutions, ensuring the government receives optimal value for its investment.

Public Impact

The U.S. Coast Guard benefits from improved facility risk management and asset visibility. Enhanced data in the Builder database will support better long-term infrastructure planning. Real-time equipment inventory and life-cycle management will improve operational efficiency. Facilities in West Virginia are directly impacted by these triennial assessments.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if assessment criteria are not clearly defined.
Reliance on accurate data input from Transystems Corporation for effective risk management.
Ensuring consistent application of assessment standards across all facilities.

Positive Signals

Clear requirement for triennial assessments ensures proactive facility maintenance.
Integration of technical results into the Builder database provides long-term value.
Focus on risk management and life-cycle planning aligns with asset stewardship principles.

Sector Analysis

Engineering services, particularly those focused on facility assessment and management, are a critical component of the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector. This contract falls under NAICS code 541330 (Engineering Services). The market for such services is competitive, with numerous firms offering specialized expertise. The value of this contract is modest within the context of large-scale federal engineering procurements, but significant for its specific focus on asset risk management.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not indicate any specific small business set-aside. There is no information provided regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless Transystems Corporation voluntarily engages small businesses for specialized support.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically reside with the U.S. Coast Guard contracting officer and program managers. The firm-fixed-price nature provides some cost control. Transparency is facilitated by the contract award being publicly available. Specific Inspector General jurisdiction would depend on the nature of any potential issues or investigations arising from contract performance.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Maintenance Contracts
Infrastructure Asset Management Systems
Triennial Facility Condition Assessments
Department of Homeland Security Capital Planning

Risk Flags

Data integrity risk
System accessibility risk
Scope creep potential

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $7.9 million to TRANSYSTEMS CORPORATION. THIS IS A REQUIREMENT FOR FACILITY ASSESSMENT ON A TRIENNIAL BASIS. TECHNICAL RESULTS ENTERED INTO BUILDER DATABASE TO IMPROVE RISK MANAGEMENT ACROSS BLDG PORTFOLIO. HELPS REAL-TIME EQUIPMENT INVENTORY + LIFE-CYCLE MANAGEMENT.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TRANSYSTEMS CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (U.S. Coast Guard).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $7.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-12-15. End: 2026-12-15.

What is the historical spending pattern for facility assessments by the U.S. Coast Guard?

Analyzing historical spending on facility assessments by the U.S. Coast Guard requires access to detailed procurement data over multiple fiscal years. Without specific historical data, it's difficult to establish a precise pattern. However, federal agencies typically conduct such assessments on a recurring basis, often triennially or annually, depending on the asset type and criticality. Spending can fluctuate based on budget allocations, infrastructure needs, and the number of facilities requiring assessment in a given period. The current $7.9 million award for a one-year period suggests a significant investment in this area, potentially indicating a renewed focus or a backlog of assessments.

How does the per-unit cost of $21,741 per day compare to similar facility assessment contracts?

The per-unit cost of $21,741 per day for facility assessments is a substantial figure. To benchmark this effectively, one would need to compare it against contracts with similar scopes of work, geographic coverage, and complexity. Factors influencing this cost include the number of personnel deployed, the level of technical expertise required, travel expenses, and the specific deliverables. Without detailed information on the number of personnel or the specific assessment methodologies employed by Transystems Corporation, a direct comparison is challenging. However, this daily rate suggests a comprehensive assessment involving a team of specialists rather than a simple inspection.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract?

While the provided data does not explicitly list Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this specific contract, the description implies several critical performance areas. The primary objective is the accurate and timely completion of facility assessments, with technical results entered into the Builder database. Therefore, KPIs would likely focus on the quality and completeness of the assessment reports, the accuracy of data entered into the database, adherence to the triennial assessment schedule, and overall compliance with the contract's technical requirements. Timeliness of deliverables and responsiveness to government requests would also be crucial performance metrics.

What is Transystems Corporation's track record with similar federal contracts?

Transystems Corporation's track record with similar federal contracts would need to be evaluated through databases like SAM.gov or FPDS. As a company specializing in engineering and transportation solutions, they likely have experience with government contracts. For this specific contract, their past performance in conducting facility assessments, managing large datasets, and integrating technical information into client databases would be highly relevant. A review of their past performance ratings on similar projects would provide insight into their reliability, technical capabilities, and ability to meet government requirements effectively.

What are the potential risks associated with relying on the Builder database for risk management?

The primary risks associated with relying on the Builder database for risk management stem from data integrity and system accessibility. If the technical results entered by Transystems Corporation are inaccurate, incomplete, or outdated, the risk management decisions based on this data could be flawed. Furthermore, cybersecurity threats or system failures could compromise the database, leading to a loss of critical information or operational disruptions. Ensuring robust data validation processes, regular system maintenance, and strong cybersecurity protocols are essential to mitigate these risks.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2400 PERSHING RD STE 400, KANSAS CITY, MO, 64108

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $7,935,618

Exercised Options: $7,935,618

Current Obligation: $7,935,618

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 70Z05018DTRANSY01

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline