DHS awards $4.3M extension for Denver protective security services to Triple Canopy Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $4,291,245 ($4.3M)

Contractor: Triple Canopy Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2025-07-01

End Date: 2025-10-31

Contract Duration: 122 days

Daily Burn Rate: $35.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: J&A FY25-00142 EXTENSION FOR PROTECTIVE SECURITY OFFICER SERVICES IN DOWNTOWN, DENVER WEST & DENVER EAST. SECTION 2(D)

Place of Performance

Location: LAKEWOOD, JEFFERSON County, COLORADO, 80228

State: Colorado Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $4.3 million to TRIPLE CANOPY INC for work described as: J&A FY25-00142 EXTENSION FOR PROTECTIVE SECURITY OFFICER SERVICES IN DOWNTOWN, DENVER WEST & DENVER EAST. SECTION 2(D) Key points: 1. Contract extension for essential protective security services in key Denver locations. 2. Awarded to incumbent contractor Triple Canopy Inc., suggesting a focus on continuity. 3. The contract duration is relatively short, indicating a potential for re-competition or further extensions. 4. Pricing appears to be a firm-fixed-price, which can offer cost certainty but may limit flexibility. 5. The service category is security guards and patrol services, a common government need. 6. The contract is a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle, implying a streamlined procurement process.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The awarded amount of $4.3 million for approximately four months of service represents a significant investment in protective security. Benchmarking this against similar contracts for security services in major metropolitan areas would be necessary for a precise value-for-money assessment. However, given the firm-fixed-price structure and the extension of services, it suggests the agency has a reasonable expectation of the costs involved. The previous performance of Triple Canopy Inc. would be a key factor in determining if this represents good value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The fact that it is a delivery order suggests it was placed against an existing contract vehicle that was previously competed. The number of bidders on the original vehicle would provide more insight into the level of competition. A full and open competition generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more competitive pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition ensures that taxpayers benefit from a competitive marketplace, driving down costs and encouraging innovation among service providers.

Public Impact

Federal employees and facilities in downtown Denver, Denver West, and Denver East are protected. Ensures continuity of essential security operations without interruption. Supports the Department of Homeland Security's mission to secure the nation. Provides employment for security personnel in the Denver metropolitan area.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for price creep if this extension is part of a pattern of sole-source extensions.
Lack of detailed performance metrics in the provided data makes it difficult to assess effectiveness.
Short contract duration could lead to administrative overhead for frequent renewals or re-competitions.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process.
Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Extension ensures continuity of critical security services.

Sector Analysis

The security services sector is a significant component of government contracting, encompassing a wide range of protective and investigative services. This contract falls under the 'Security Guards and Patrol Services' (NAICS 561612) category. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous large and small businesses vying for federal contracts. Government spending in this area is consistent due to ongoing security needs across various agencies and locations.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation (sb) is false and the contract was not a small business set-aside (ss). This suggests that the primary award was not specifically targeted towards small businesses. However, the prime contractor, Triple Canopy Inc., may utilize small businesses for subcontracting opportunities, which is not detailed in this specific award notice. Further investigation into subcontracting plans would be needed to assess the impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Homeland Security's contracting officers and program managers. The Office of Procurement Operations is responsible for the procurement process. Inspector General oversight may be exercised depending on the nature of any reported issues or audits. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics are often internal.

Related Government Programs

Protective Security Services
Federal Law Enforcement Support
Department of Homeland Security Contracts
Security Guard Services

Risk Flags

Potential for lack of competition in future renewals if this is a pattern.
Short duration may indicate interim solution rather than long-term strategy.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $4.3 million to TRIPLE CANOPY INC. J&A FY25-00142 EXTENSION FOR PROTECTIVE SECURITY OFFICER SERVICES IN DOWNTOWN, DENVER WEST & DENVER EAST. SECTION 2(D)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TRIPLE CANOPY INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (Office of Procurement Operations).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $4.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-07-01. End: 2025-10-31.

What is the historical spending trend for protective security services by the Department of Homeland Security in Denver?

Analyzing historical spending for protective security services by DHS in Denver requires accessing and aggregating data from previous contract awards. This would involve searching contract databases for similar service codes (NAICS 561612) and keywords related to 'protective security,' 'security guards,' and 'Denver' over several fiscal years. The trend analysis would reveal if spending has been consistent, increasing, or decreasing, and whether contracts have predominantly been awarded through full and open competition or other methods. Understanding this trend provides context for the current $4.3 million extension, indicating whether it aligns with past investment levels or represents a significant shift in resource allocation for security in the region.

How does the per-diem cost of this contract compare to similar security contracts in other major federal facilities?

To compare the per-diem cost, we would first calculate the daily rate by dividing the total contract value ($4,291,245.33) by the contract duration in days (122 days), yielding approximately $35,174 per day. This daily rate would then be benchmarked against similar contracts for protective security services awarded by other federal agencies in comparable metropolitan areas. Factors such as the number of guards, required security clearances, specific duties, and geographic location influence these costs. A higher per-diem rate might be justified by specialized requirements or higher operational costs in a specific region, while a lower rate could indicate greater efficiency or a more competitive bidding environment.

What is Triple Canopy Inc.'s performance record with the Department of Homeland Security on similar contracts?

Assessing Triple Canopy Inc.'s performance record with DHS requires reviewing past performance evaluations and contract histories. This typically involves consulting sources like the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) or other internal agency performance databases. Key metrics would include on-time delivery, quality of service, adherence to security protocols, and responsiveness to issues. A history of positive performance ratings would support the decision to extend the contract, suggesting reliability and value. Conversely, documented performance issues could raise concerns about the continued suitability of the contractor and the value proposition of the extension.

What are the specific security risks being mitigated by this contract in downtown Denver, Denver West, and Denver East?

The specific security risks mitigated by this contract are not detailed in the award notice but are inherent to the protective security officer services provided. These typically include unauthorized access to federal facilities, theft, vandalism, workplace violence, and potential threats to personnel and government assets. The presence of security officers acts as a deterrent and provides immediate response capabilities. The geographic scope (downtown, Denver West, Denver East) suggests the contract covers multiple federal buildings or areas requiring a consistent security presence to maintain a safe and secure environment for government operations and employees.

What is the potential impact of this contract extension on future competition for security services in the Denver area?

The impact of this contract extension on future competition depends on several factors. If this is a short-term extension leading to a re-competition under full and open procedures, it may not significantly deter future bidders. However, if it signals a trend towards longer-term extensions or sole-source awards for these services, it could discourage new entrants or smaller businesses from investing in the resources needed to compete. The original contract vehicle's terms and the agency's stated intentions for future procurement strategies are crucial. A robust re-competition process would ensure continued market engagement and potentially better pricing for taxpayers.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Guards and Patrol Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 13530 DULLES TECHNOLOGY DR STE 500, HERNDON, VA, 20171

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $4,291,245

Exercised Options: $4,291,245

Current Obligation: $4,291,245

Actual Outlays: $1,973,008

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 70RFPW19DW8000001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline