DHS awards $5.46M security services contract to Alante Security Group, Inc. for New York region

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $5,462,723 ($5.5M)

Contractor: Alante Security Group, Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2025-12-01

End Date: 2026-09-30

Contract Duration: 303 days

Daily Burn Rate: $18.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: PSO SERVICES THROUGHOUT BROOKLYN, LONG ISLAND, AND STATEN ISLAND NEW YORK - NEW TASK ORDER

Place of Performance

Location: CENTRAL ISLIP, SUFFOLK County, NEW YORK, 11722

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $5.5 million to ALANTE SECURITY GROUP, INC for work described as: PSO SERVICES THROUGHOUT BROOKLYN, LONG ISLAND, AND STATEN ISLAND NEW YORK - NEW TASK ORDER Key points: 1. Contract focuses on security guard and patrol services, a critical function for public safety. 2. The award was made under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration of 303 days indicates a short-term need for these services. 4. The firm-fixed-price contract type helps manage cost certainty for the government. 5. The geographic scope covers Brooklyn, Long Island, and Staten Island, a significant metropolitan area. 6. No small business set-aside was utilized for this specific award.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $5.46 million for approximately 10 months of security services appears reasonable given the scope and location. Benchmarking against similar contracts for security guard services in major metropolitan areas would provide further context. The firm-fixed-price structure helps control costs, but the absence of detailed performance metrics makes a precise value-for-money assessment challenging without further data.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' which implies that while the initial solicitation might have had some exclusions, the final award was made after a broad competitive process. The number of bidders is not specified, but this type of competition generally aims to solicit offers from all responsible sources, fostering price discovery and potentially leading to better pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process is generally favorable for taxpayers as it encourages multiple vendors to bid, driving down prices and ensuring the government receives competitive offers.

Public Impact

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) benefits from enhanced security coverage in key New York locations. Residents and businesses in Brooklyn, Long Island, and Staten Island benefit from increased public safety. The contract supports the delivery of essential security guard and patrol services. The geographic impact is concentrated within the New York metropolitan area, a densely populated region. The contract likely supports local employment within the security services sector in New York.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited transparency on the number of bidders and specific evaluation criteria.
Short contract duration may lead to frequent re-competition and potential disruption.
Reliance on firm-fixed-price without detailed performance incentives could limit service quality optimization.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust bidding process.
Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Focus on essential security services addresses a critical government need.
Geographic coverage is specific and addresses a defined operational area.

Sector Analysis

The security services industry is a significant sector within the broader professional, scientific, and technical services market. This contract falls under the Security Guards and Patrol Services NAICS code (561612). The market for government security services is substantial, with numerous contracts awarded annually across various federal agencies. This specific award represents a small portion of overall federal spending on security, but it is crucial for the operational needs of the Department of Homeland Security in a high-density urban area.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses mentioned in the provided data. This means that larger businesses were eligible to compete and potentially win the award without mandated participation from small businesses. The impact on the small business ecosystem is neutral to potentially negative if small businesses were unable to compete effectively against larger entities or if subcontracting opportunities were not pursued.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Homeland Security's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, requiring the contractor to deliver services as specified. Transparency is facilitated by the contract award notice, but further details on performance monitoring and any Inspector General involvement would require access to the full contract and agency reporting.

Related Government Programs

Federal Protective Service Contracts
Department of Homeland Security Security Operations
Security Guard Services
Patrol Services Contracts
New York Metropolitan Area Federal Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for service quality degradation due to firm-fixed-price structure.
Logistical challenges in overseeing services across a wide geographic area.
Risk of contractor performance issues impacting security effectiveness.
Limited visibility into the number of actual bidders post-exclusion.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $5.5 million to ALANTE SECURITY GROUP, INC. PSO SERVICES THROUGHOUT BROOKLYN, LONG ISLAND, AND STATEN ISLAND NEW YORK - NEW TASK ORDER

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ALANTE SECURITY GROUP, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (Office of Procurement Operations).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $5.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-12-01. End: 2026-09-30.

What is Alante Security Group, Inc.'s track record with federal contracts, particularly with DHS?

Alante Security Group, Inc. has a history of receiving federal contracts, including those with the Department of Homeland Security. Analyzing their past performance, including contract values, types, and any reported issues or successes, is crucial for assessing their reliability and capability for this specific task order. A review of their contract history would reveal if they have successfully managed similar security service contracts in terms of scope, duration, and geographic complexity. Past performance evaluations, if publicly available, would offer insights into their adherence to schedules, quality of service, and overall client satisfaction. Understanding their experience with firm-fixed-price contracts and their ability to meet stringent security requirements is also important.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar security services in the New York metropolitan area?

To assess the value for money, the awarded price of approximately $5.46 million for 10 months of security services needs to be benchmarked against prevailing market rates in Brooklyn, Long Island, and Staten Island. This involves researching average hourly rates for security guards, supervisory personnel, and any specialized services provided, considering factors like experience levels, licensing, and the specific security needs (e.g., armed vs. unarmed guards, surveillance technology integration). Comparing the total contract value against the estimated number of man-hours or guard-posts required can provide a per-hour or per-post cost. If this rate is significantly lower or higher than industry averages for comparable services in a high-cost-of-living area like New York, it would indicate potential overpayment or an exceptionally competitive bid.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Key risks for this contract include potential service quality issues if contractor personnel are not adequately trained or supervised, leading to security lapses. Another risk is contractor performance variability, especially given the firm-fixed-price structure which might incentivize cost-cutting over quality. Geographic dispersion across Brooklyn, Long Island, and Staten Island could pose logistical challenges for effective oversight and rapid response. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust performance monitoring by DHS, clear service level agreements within the contract, and potentially site inspections. The contractor's own internal quality control processes and adherence to security protocols are also critical mitigation factors. The short duration might also introduce a risk of discontinuity if follow-on contracts are not secured promptly.

How effective is the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' approach in ensuring competitive pricing for this security contract?

The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' approach aims to balance broad competition with specific requirements. While 'full and open' suggests a wide solicitation, the 'exclusion of sources' implies that certain potential bidders were initially disqualified or not considered, perhaps due to specific technical requirements, past performance issues, or security clearances. The effectiveness in ensuring competitive pricing depends heavily on how many responsible and capable vendors remained eligible after exclusions. If a sufficient number of qualified bidders participated, the competition should drive down prices. However, if the exclusions significantly limited the pool of potential offerors, the competitive pressure might be reduced, potentially leading to less favorable pricing for the government compared to a truly unrestricted full and open competition.

What is the historical spending pattern for security services by the Department of Homeland Security in the New York region?

Analyzing historical spending by DHS for security services in the New York region (Brooklyn, Long Island, Staten Island) would provide context for the current $5.46 million award. This involves examining previous contract awards for similar services, their values, durations, and the contractors involved. Understanding whether spending has been consistent, increasing, or decreasing can indicate trends in demand and resource allocation. Comparing the current contract's value and duration against historical data helps determine if this award is typical, an outlier, or part of a strategic shift in security posture. It also helps assess if DHS has historically relied on a few key providers or a diverse range of contractors for these essential services in the region.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Guards and Patrol Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: 70RFP124RE2000004

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 522 GRAND BLVD, WESTBURY, NY, 11590

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $5,462,723

Exercised Options: $5,462,723

Current Obligation: $5,462,723

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 70RFP125DE2000006

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline