DOT Awards $3.4M for Architectural Services to C.H. Guernsey & Company for WIWAVES Project

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,428,955 ($3.4M)

Contractor: C. H. Guernsey & Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2020-01-16

End Date: 2024-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,719 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.0K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: A/E SERVICE FOR TYPE B CAMI WIWAVES 0.00 PROJECT

Place of Performance

Location: OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA County, OKLAHOMA, 73169

State: Oklahoma Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $3.4 million to C. H. GUERNSEY & COMPANY for work described as: A/E SERVICE FOR TYPE B CAMI WIWAVES 0.00 PROJECT Key points: 1. Contract awarded for architectural services related to the WIWAVES project. 2. C.H. Guernsey & Company is the sole awardee. 3. The contract spans nearly five years, indicating a significant project duration. 4. The sector is architectural services, a common area for federal contracting.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $3.4M over 1719 days suggests a moderate daily rate. Without specific deliverables or comparable projects, a precise pricing assessment is difficult. However, the fixed-price nature provides some cost certainty.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This limits price discovery and potentially reduces competitive pressure, which could lead to higher costs for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition may result in a higher cost to taxpayers than if the contract had been competitively bid.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be paying more due to the absence of competitive bidding. The long contract duration could impact the agency's ability to adapt to changing needs. Transparency in the sole-source justification is crucial for public trust.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Sole-source award limits competition
Long contract duration

Positive Signals

Firm fixed price contract type

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Architectural Services sector (NAICS 541310). Federal spending in this area typically supports infrastructure development and facility management across various agencies.

Small Business Impact

The awardee, C.H. Guernsey & Company, is not indicated as a small business. The contract was not competed, so there was no specific opportunity for small business set-asides.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this award warrants scrutiny to ensure proper justification and that taxpayer funds are used efficiently. Further review of the justification for not competing is recommended.

Related Government Programs

Architectural Services
Department of Transportation Contracting
Federal Aviation Administration Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of competition
Potential for overpricing
Long contract duration may reduce flexibility
Limited transparency on sole-source justification

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $3.4 million to C. H. GUERNSEY & COMPANY. A/E SERVICE FOR TYPE B CAMI WIWAVES 0.00 PROJECT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is C. H. GUERNSEY & COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-01-16. End: 2024-09-30.

What was the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?

The justification for a sole-source award typically involves unique capabilities, urgent needs, or situations where only one responsible source can provide the required services. Without access to the specific justification document, it's impossible to determine the precise reasons. However, agencies must demonstrate that competition was not feasible or would not be in the government's best interest.

How does the pricing compare to similar architectural service contracts awarded competitively?

Direct comparison is challenging without detailed scope of work and market data. However, sole-source contracts often carry a risk of being priced higher than competitively awarded ones due to the lack of market pressure. A benchmark analysis against similar, competitively procured contracts would be necessary to assess if the $3.4M award represents fair and reasonable pricing.

What is the expected impact of this architectural service on the WIWAVES project's overall effectiveness?

The effectiveness of the architectural services will directly influence the successful design and implementation of the WIWAVES project. High-quality architectural input is crucial for ensuring the project meets its objectives, is built to specification, and operates efficiently. The long duration suggests a significant role in the project's lifecycle.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Architectural Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - CONSTRUCTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: 6973GH-20-R-00003

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5555 N GRAND BLVD STE 100, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK, 73112

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,428,955

Exercised Options: $3,428,955

Current Obligation: $3,428,955

Actual Outlays: $3,376,136

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline