Transportation's $6.8M engineering services contract awarded to Advanced Management Technology, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $6,818,897 ($6.8M)

Contractor: Advanced Management Technology, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2020-08-10

End Date: 2026-05-21

Contract Duration: 2,110 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: Other

Official Description: ARA EIM TASK ORDER

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20591

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $6.8 million to ADVANCED MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: ARA EIM TASK ORDER Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for the duration and scope of engineering services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process was utilized. 3. The contract duration of nearly six years indicates a long-term need for these services. 4. Performance is tied to the Federal Aviation Administration's mission-critical systems. 5. Engineering services are a key component of infrastructure development and maintenance. 6. The contract is a delivery order under a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) vehicle, suggesting potential for future task orders.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $6.8 million over nearly six years for engineering services is within a reasonable range for federal contracts of this nature. Without specific benchmarks for 'ARA EIM TASK ORDER' services, a direct per-unit cost comparison is difficult. However, the duration and the nature of engineering support for federal agencies typically involve significant labor hours and specialized expertise, justifying the overall expenditure. The use of a delivery order under an IDIQ contract also implies that pricing was established through a prior competitive process.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This suggests a robust bidding environment, likely leading to competitive pricing and a wider selection of qualified contractors. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation is a strong indicator of a healthy competitive landscape for this engineering services requirement.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from full and open competition through potentially lower prices and access to a broader range of innovative solutions. This approach helps ensure that federal funds are used efficiently by driving down costs and improving service quality.

Public Impact

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) benefits from specialized engineering services to support its systems. This contract contributes to the maintenance and potential upgrades of critical aviation infrastructure. The services delivered are essential for ensuring the safety and efficiency of the national airspace system. The primary impact is on the operational capabilities of the FAA, rather than a direct geographic or workforce impact outside of the contractor's employees.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics or outcome-based evaluations in the provided data.
Potential for cost overruns if the scope of work expands beyond initial estimates.
Dependence on a single contractor for a significant period could lead to vendor lock-in.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing structure.
Long-term contract duration indicates a stable and ongoing need, allowing for contractor investment in expertise.
The contract is a delivery order, implying it's part of a pre-competed IDIQ vehicle, which streamlines procurement.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, a critical component of the broader professional, scientific, and technical services industry. This sector supports government agencies in areas ranging from infrastructure development to complex system design and maintenance. Federal spending in engineering services is substantial, driven by the need for specialized expertise in areas like transportation, defense, and energy. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) for similar NAICS codes (541330) and agencies.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a specific set-aside requirement for this contract. Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from set-aside provisions. The prime contractor, Advanced Management Technology, Inc., is likely a mid-to-large-sized business, and their subcontracting plans, if any, would be detailed in the full contract documentation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the contract administration team within the Federal Aviation Administration. Performance monitoring, invoicing review, and adherence to contract terms are standard oversight mechanisms. Transparency is facilitated through public contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.

Related Government Programs

Federal Aviation Administration Operations Support
Engineering and Technical Services
Information Technology Support Services
Professional Services Contracts
Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contracts

Risk Flags

Long contract duration may increase risk of vendor lock-in.
Potential for scope creep in engineering services contracts.
Performance metrics not explicitly detailed in summary data.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $6.8 million to ADVANCED MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY, INC.. ARA EIM TASK ORDER

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ADVANCED MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $6.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-08-10. End: 2026-05-21.

What is the specific nature of the 'ARA EIM TASK ORDER' services being provided?

The provided data identifies the contract as an 'ARA EIM TASK ORDER' with the NAICS code 541330 (Engineering Services) and the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) description 'Engineering Services'. While the specific task order name suggests a focus on 'ARA EIM', which likely refers to a specific program or system within the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) related to Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC) or similar initiatives and potentially an Enterprise Information Management (EIM) system, the exact deliverables are not detailed. These services likely encompass a range of engineering disciplines such as systems engineering, software engineering, technical analysis, and project management to support the FAA's operational and informational needs. Further details would be found in the task order's statement of work.

How does the pricing of this contract compare to similar engineering services contracts awarded by the FAA or other federal agencies?

Directly comparing the pricing of this $6.8 million contract over nearly six years is challenging without specific benchmarks for the 'ARA EIM TASK ORDER' services. However, the contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' which generally promotes competitive pricing. The labor hour (pt: LABOR HOURS) pricing mechanism suggests that costs are tied to the time and expertise required. To perform a robust comparison, one would need to analyze similar contracts with the same NAICS code (541330) and similar scope, duration, and agency, looking at average hourly rates for different labor categories and the total contract value relative to the expected work output. Publicly available data from the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) can be used for such benchmarking.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate the success of this contract?

The provided data does not explicitly list the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate the success of this contract. Typically, for engineering services contracts, KPIs would be defined in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) and could include factors such as on-time delivery of milestones, adherence to budget, quality of deliverables (e.g., accuracy of designs, completeness of reports), technical performance of systems supported, and responsiveness to task order requirements. The contracting officer's representative (COR) would be responsible for monitoring performance against these metrics throughout the contract's lifecycle.

What is the track record of Advanced Management Technology, Inc. in performing similar federal contracts?

Advanced Management Technology, Inc. (AMT) has a history of performing federal contracts, as indicated by this award. To assess their track record for similar engineering services, one would need to examine their past performance information available in federal databases like FPDS. This would involve looking at prior contracts awarded to AMT under NAICS code 541330, their performance ratings (if available), any past performance issues or disputes, and their experience with the Department of Transportation or the Federal Aviation Administration specifically. A review of their contract history would reveal their capacity, reliability, and expertise in delivering complex engineering solutions to government clients.

What is the historical spending trend for engineering services by the Federal Aviation Administration?

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) consistently spends significant amounts on engineering and technical services to support its vast infrastructure and regulatory functions. Historical spending trends for engineering services (NAICS 541330) by the FAA have generally shown a steady demand, driven by the modernization of air traffic control systems, airport infrastructure projects, research and development, and ongoing operational support. While specific year-over-year figures fluctuate based on budget allocations and program priorities, the FAA remains a major federal consumer of these specialized services. Analyzing FPDS data over several fiscal years would provide a detailed view of this spending pattern, highlighting major contract vehicles and areas of investment.

Are there any identified risks associated with this specific task order or the contractor?

Based on the limited data provided, specific risks associated with this task order are not explicitly detailed. However, general risks for long-term engineering services contracts include potential scope creep, which could lead to cost overruns if not managed effectively. Dependence on a single contractor for nearly six years could also pose a risk if the contractor's performance degrades or if their capabilities become outdated. Contractor-specific risks would typically be assessed during the pre-award phase through past performance reviews and financial stability checks. Without access to the full contract documentation and performance history, a comprehensive risk assessment is not possible.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Tetra Tech, Inc.

Address: 1515 WILSON BLVD STE 1100, ARLINGTON, VA, 22209

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $7,368,109

Exercised Options: $6,818,897

Current Obligation: $6,818,897

Actual Outlays: $6,387,653

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DTFAWA17D00013

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline