Transportation contract for community involvement services awarded to Advanced Management Technology, Inc. for over $16.3 million

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $16,352,240 ($16.4M)

Contractor: Advanced Management Technology, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2018-04-13

End Date: 2026-05-21

Contract Duration: 2,960 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: PBN COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20591

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $16.4 million to ADVANCED MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: PBN COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized engineering and community engagement services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process. 3. Contract duration of nearly 5 years indicates a long-term need for these services. 4. Performance is tied to the Federal Aviation Administration's initiatives. 5. Services fall within the engineering services sector, supporting infrastructure projects. 6. The contract type is Time and Materials, which can pose cost control risks if not managed closely.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of over $16.3 million for engineering services, specifically community involvement, over a period of nearly 5 years seems within a reasonable range for federal projects of this nature. Benchmarking against similar contracts for specialized engineering and public outreach services would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The Time and Materials pricing structure, while flexible, warrants close monitoring to ensure costs remain aligned with project milestones and deliverables.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. This process generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service quality. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the open competition suggests a healthy market response for these specialized engineering services.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from the potential for cost savings and improved service quality due to a competitive bidding environment.

Public Impact

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is the primary beneficiary, utilizing these services for its projects. Services delivered include community involvement and engagement, crucial for public acceptance and input on infrastructure projects. The contract is geographically focused on the District of Columbia. Workforce implications include the potential for employment of engineers, community liaisons, and administrative staff.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Time and Materials contract type can lead to cost overruns if not strictly managed.
Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes it difficult to assess effectiveness.
Limited information on the number of bidders in the full and open competition.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a fair and competitive process.
Long contract duration indicates a sustained need and potential for stable service delivery.
Services are critical for public engagement in federal projects.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS code 541330), a significant segment of federal procurement supporting infrastructure development and government operations. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous firms capable of providing specialized expertise in areas like community outreach and public engagement, which are vital for the successful execution of large-scale federal projects, particularly within aviation.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a set-aside provision. However, the prime contractor, Advanced Management Technology, Inc., may engage small businesses as subcontractors, which would be detailed in their subcontracting plan, if applicable.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures would be tied to the contract's performance work statement and delivery schedules. Transparency is facilitated through federal procurement databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Federal Aviation Administration Airport Improvement Program
Department of Transportation Community Planning Grants
Public Engagement Services for Federal Infrastructure Projects

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials pricing.
Lack of specific performance metrics in summary data.
Limited information on the number of bidders.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $16.4 million to ADVANCED MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY, INC.. PBN COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ADVANCED MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $16.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2018-04-13. End: 2026-05-21.

What is the track record of Advanced Management Technology, Inc. with federal contracts, particularly with the Department of Transportation?

Advanced Management Technology, Inc. has a history of securing federal contracts, including those with the Department of Transportation. While specific details on past performance metrics and any past issues are not provided in this summary, their ability to win a contract of this value and duration suggests a level of established capability. A deeper dive into their contract history, including past performance evaluations and any disputes or corrective actions, would be necessary for a comprehensive assessment of their track record. Examining their performance on similar FAA or DOT projects would offer the most relevant insights into their reliability and effectiveness.

How does the awarded amount compare to similar community involvement contracts within the federal government?

The awarded amount of over $16.3 million for nearly five years of service for community involvement and engineering support is substantial. To benchmark this effectively, comparisons should be made with contracts for similar scope and complexity, particularly those managed by the Federal Aviation Administration or other agencies undertaking large infrastructure projects. Factors such as the specific deliverables, geographic scope, and the level of specialized expertise required will influence pricing. Without direct comparable contract data, it's challenging to definitively state if this represents excellent or fair value, but the duration and the nature of the services suggest a significant investment.

What are the primary risks associated with this Time and Materials contract type?

The primary risk with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract is the potential for cost overruns, as the government pays for the actual labor hours and materials used, plus a fixed fee or percentage. Unlike fixed-price contracts, there is less incentive for the contractor to control costs efficiently. For this contract, risks include scope creep, inefficient labor utilization, and inflated material costs if not rigorously monitored by the FAA. Effective oversight, detailed reporting requirements, and clear task definitions are crucial to mitigate these risks and ensure the government receives good value for its investment.

How effective are community involvement services in ensuring the success of federal aviation projects?

Community involvement services are critical for the success of federal aviation projects, especially those impacting local communities. Effective engagement ensures that public concerns, feedback, and local needs are identified and addressed early in the planning process. This can lead to smoother project execution, reduced delays caused by public opposition, and ultimately, projects that better serve the public interest. For the FAA, successful community involvement can foster trust, enhance public perception of aviation infrastructure, and contribute to the long-term viability and acceptance of airport and airspace projects.

What has been the historical spending trend for engineering services by the Federal Aviation Administration?

Historical spending trends for engineering services by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) generally reflect the agency's ongoing investments in modernizing air traffic control systems, improving airport infrastructure, and ensuring aviation safety. Spending in this category can fluctuate based on major capital improvement projects, technological upgrades, and regulatory changes. While specific year-over-year data for engineering services is not provided here, the FAA consistently procures a significant volume of engineering support to manage its complex and vast operational environment. This contract represents a portion of that ongoing expenditure.

Are there any specific performance indicators or metrics associated with this contract that are publicly available?

Publicly available information on specific performance indicators or metrics for this contract is limited in the provided data. Federal contracts typically include a Performance Work Statement (PWS) or Statement of Work (SOW) that outlines detailed requirements, deliverables, and performance standards. These metrics are crucial for assessing the contractor's success. While the contract is for 'Community Involvement,' the precise metrics (e.g., number of meetings held, stakeholder satisfaction levels, quality of reports submitted) are usually found within the contract's official documentation, which may not be fully accessible or summarized in public databases.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: MODIFICATION OF EQUIPMENT › MODIFICATION OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Tetra Tech, Inc.

Address: 1515 WILSON BLVD STE 1100, ARLINGTON, VA, 22209

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $16,352,240

Exercised Options: $16,352,240

Current Obligation: $16,352,240

Actual Outlays: $13,434,134

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DTFAWA17D00013

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline