EPA awards $3.57M for remediation services, with a 5-year performance period

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,568,535 ($3.6M)

Contractor: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., PBC

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 2025-09-30

End Date: 2029-09-29

Contract Duration: 1,460 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: VBI70 - RAF DES

Place of Performance

Location: DENVER, DENVER County, COLORADO, 80202

State: Colorado Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $3.6 million to EA ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY, INC., PBC for work described as: VBI70 - RAF DES Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for the scope of environmental remediation services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a healthy market for these services. 3. Performance period of 5 years allows for sustained environmental management. 4. Contract type (Cost Plus Fixed Fee) is common for complex environmental projects. 5. Geographic focus on Colorado indicates targeted environmental needs. 6. No small business set-aside noted, potentially limiting direct small business participation.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $3.57 million over five years for remediation services is within a typical range for environmental cleanup projects of this nature. Without specific details on the scope of work, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the duration suggests a substantial project. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure allows for flexibility in addressing unforeseen environmental conditions while providing the contractor with a defined profit margin. This structure is generally considered fair for complex, evolving projects.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. This process typically leads to a more competitive pricing environment and a wider selection of capable contractors. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the designation suggests a robust bidding process was available.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from full and open competition through potentially lower prices and access to a broader range of innovative solutions. This approach ensures that the government is not limited to a single provider, fostering efficiency and value.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely communities and ecosystems in Colorado impacted by environmental contamination. Services delivered will focus on the assessment and cleanup of hazardous substances. Geographic impact is concentrated within Colorado, addressing specific regional environmental concerns. The contract supports a workforce skilled in environmental science, engineering, and remediation techniques.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns inherent in Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts if not closely managed.
Limited direct visibility into small business subcontracting opportunities without further data.
Scope creep could increase the final cost beyond initial estimates if not tightly controlled.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive market and potentially better value.
Long-term performance period allows for sustained focus on remediation goals.
Contractor's specialization in environmental services indicates relevant expertise.

Sector Analysis

Environmental remediation services fall under the broader environmental consulting and engineering sector. This sector is critical for addressing legacy pollution and ensuring compliance with environmental regulations. Spending in this area is driven by federal and state mandates, as well as private sector cleanup needs. Comparable contracts often involve site assessments, hazardous waste management, and ecosystem restoration, with values varying significantly based on project scale and complexity.

Small Business Impact

The contract does not indicate a small business set-aside. While this allows for full and open competition, it means that small businesses may not have a direct, guaranteed opportunity to perform the primary work. Subcontracting opportunities may arise, but their availability and extent would depend on the prime contractor's strategy and the nature of the work.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight will likely be managed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) contracting officers and technical representatives. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure necessitates diligent monitoring of costs and performance to ensure value for money. Transparency is generally maintained through contract reporting requirements, though specific public access to detailed project reports may vary.

Related Government Programs

Superfund Program
RCRA Corrective Actions
Brownfields Program
Defense Environmental Remediation

Risk Flags

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type requires robust oversight to manage potential cost escalations.
Lack of specific scope details necessitates careful monitoring of task orders.
No explicit small business participation noted, requiring potential follow-up on subcontracting.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $3.6 million to EA ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY, INC., PBC. VBI70 - RAF DES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is EA ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY, INC., PBC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-30. End: 2029-09-29.

What is the specific environmental hazard or contamination being addressed by this contract?

The provided data does not specify the exact nature of the environmental hazard or contamination. However, the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 562910, 'Remediation Services,' indicates activities related to the cleanup or abatement of pollution in the air, water, or land. This could encompass a wide range of issues, from hazardous waste disposal and site remediation to asbestos and lead abatement. Further details would be found in the contract's statement of work (SOW) or task orders.

How does the awarded amount compare to similar remediation contracts awarded by the EPA?

Without specific details on the scope of work, comparing the $3.57 million award is challenging. However, remediation projects can range from tens of thousands to hundreds of millions of dollars. The five-year duration suggests a moderately sized, ongoing effort rather than a single, large-scale cleanup event. The EPA frequently awards contracts in the millions for site-specific cleanups, hazardous waste management, and environmental consulting. Benchmarking would require analyzing contracts with similar geographic scope, contamination types, and remediation methodologies.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract?

The provided data does not list the specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract. Typically, for remediation services, KPIs would focus on the effectiveness of the cleanup (e.g., meeting regulatory standards for contaminant levels), adherence to project schedules, safety performance (e.g., incident rates), and compliance with environmental regulations. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure often includes performance incentives or penalties tied to achieving specific milestones or outcomes.

What is the contractor's track record with the EPA or similar agencies for remediation services?

The data identifies EA ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY, INC., PBC as the contractor. A comprehensive assessment of their track record would involve reviewing their past performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), previous contracts with the EPA and other federal agencies, and any history of disputes or corrective actions. Their specialization in environmental services suggests they possess relevant experience, but the quality and scale of that experience would need further investigation.

What is the potential risk associated with the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type for this project?

The primary risk with a CPFF contract is the potential for cost overruns if the contractor's costs exceed initial estimates, although the fixed fee provides a ceiling on the contractor's profit. Effective oversight by the EPA is crucial to manage these risks. This involves rigorous review of the contractor's incurred costs, justification for expenditures, and progress towards project objectives. The CPFF structure is often used when the scope of work is not precisely defined or is expected to evolve, making it suitable for complex environmental remediation where unforeseen conditions are common.

Are there any specific environmental regulations or compliance requirements tied to this contract?

While not explicitly stated in the provided data, environmental remediation contracts awarded by the EPA are inherently tied to stringent federal regulations. These would likely include, but not be limited to, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and potentially state-specific environmental laws in Colorado. Compliance with these regulations, including specific cleanup standards and reporting requirements, would be a critical component of the contract's performance expectations.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 225 SCHILLING CIR STE 400, HUNT VALLEY, MD, 21031

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $16,294,378

Exercised Options: $8,923,636

Current Obligation: $3,568,535

Actual Outlays: $153,804

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 68HE0318D0005

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline