EPA awards $203,888 contract for environmental consulting services to DPRA INCORPORATED
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $203,888 ($203.9K)
Contractor: Dpra Incorporated
Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Start Date: 2023-07-01
End Date: 2024-06-30
Contract Duration: 365 days
Daily Burn Rate: $559/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS
Sector: Other
Official Description: UTAH AUTHORIZATION RE-REVIEW AND CODIFICATION
Place of Performance
Location: DENVER, DENVER County, COLORADO, 80202
State: Colorado Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Environmental Protection Agency obligated $203,888.07 to DPRA INCORPORATED for work described as: UTAH AUTHORIZATION RE-REVIEW AND CODIFICATION Key points: 1. Contract awarded through a Best Practices Agreement (BPA) Call, indicating a pre-negotiated agreement. 2. Services are categorized under Environmental Consulting, a common need for regulatory agencies. 3. The contract duration is one year, suggesting a focused scope of work. 4. The award amount is relatively modest for federal contracts, potentially indicating a specific task or phase. 5. The contract was competed on a full and open basis, suggesting broad market access. 6. The contractor, DPRA INCORPORATED, is based in Colorado, with the work likely supporting EPA's Region 8.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $203,888 for a one-year period for environmental consulting services appears reasonable for the scope of work. Without specific deliverables or performance metrics, a direct comparison to similar contracts is challenging. However, the BPA Call mechanism suggests that pricing may have been benchmarked during the initial BPA establishment. The labor hours pricing model allows for flexibility but requires careful monitoring to ensure cost efficiency.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The use of a BPA Call suggests that multiple vendors may have been considered or that this specific call was competed among BPA holders. A full and open competition generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service quality.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive process that aims to secure the best value for the government's investment in environmental consulting services.
Public Impact
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) benefits from expert consulting services to support its mission. Services likely involve technical analysis, review, and codification of environmental regulations or data. The geographic impact is likely focused on EPA Region 8, which includes Colorado. The contract supports specialized professional services, potentially involving a small team of consultants.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if initial authorization review is more complex than anticipated.
- Dependence on contractor expertise may limit internal EPA knowledge development in this specific area.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through a competitive process, suggesting a fair market price was likely achieved.
- BPA Call mechanism implies pre-vetting of the contractor and potentially pre-negotiated terms.
- Clear contract duration of one year provides defined expectations and budget certainty.
Sector Analysis
The environmental consulting services sector is a significant part of the professional services industry supporting government agencies. Federal agencies like the EPA frequently procure these services for regulatory compliance, research, and policy development. Spending in this sector is driven by environmental regulations and the need for specialized scientific and technical expertise. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within broader professional services categories, with specific rates varying by expertise and geographic location.
Small Business Impact
The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the 'sb' field is false, indicating no specific small business participation was mandated. This suggests the competition was open to all eligible firms, including large businesses. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses are not explicitly detailed but could arise if DPRA INCORPORATED chooses to engage them for specific tasks.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the technical point of contact within the EPA. The BPA Call mechanism itself implies a level of pre-qualification and oversight. Transparency is facilitated by public contract databases, and any specific Inspector General jurisdiction would depend on the nature of any potential issues arising from the contract's performance.
Related Government Programs
- Environmental Consulting Services
- Regulatory Compliance Support
- Environmental Policy Analysis
- Professional Services Contracts
Risk Flags
- Potential for scope creep
- Dependence on contractor expertise
- Risk of inaccurate codification if contractor performance is subpar
Tags
environmental-consulting, environmental-protection-agency, epa, dpra-incorporated, bpa-call, full-and-open-competition, professional-services, labor-hours, region-8, colorado, utah-authorization, codification
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Environmental Protection Agency awarded $203,888.07 to DPRA INCORPORATED. UTAH AUTHORIZATION RE-REVIEW AND CODIFICATION
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DPRA INCORPORATED.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $203,888.07.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-07-01. End: 2024-06-30.
What is the specific nature of the 'UTAH AUTHORIZATION RE-REVIEW AND CODIFICATION' task?
The specific nature of the 'UTAH AUTHORIZATION RE-REVIEW AND CODIFICATION' task is not detailed in the provided data. However, based on the contract description 'Environmental Consulting Services' and the agency 'Environmental Protection Agency,' it likely involves a review of environmental regulations or authorizations specific to the state of Utah. This could include assessing existing permits, compliance documents, or legislative authorizations related to environmental protection. The 'codification' aspect suggests the task may involve organizing, standardizing, and formally documenting these authorizations, potentially for easier access, management, or integration into broader EPA systems. The contractor, DPRA INCORPORATED, would be expected to provide expert analysis and recommendations on how to best codify these authorizations, ensuring accuracy, consistency, and compliance with federal standards.
How does the award amount of $203,888 compare to typical EPA environmental consulting contracts?
The award amount of $203,888 for a one-year contract is on the lower end for federal environmental consulting services, especially for a large agency like the EPA. Many EPA contracts for comprehensive environmental assessments, remediation oversight, or large-scale policy development can range from hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars. This contract's value suggests a more focused scope, such as a specific review, a defined phase of a larger project, or specialized technical assistance. It's possible this is one of many task orders under a larger BPA, or it represents a specific, limited-duration requirement. Benchmarking would require comparing it to contracts with similar North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes (541620) and similar task scopes, which are not fully detailed here.
What are the potential risks associated with this contract for the EPA?
Potential risks for the EPA with this contract include the possibility of the contractor not meeting the required expertise or quality standards for the 'UTAH AUTHORIZATION RE-REVIEW AND CODIFICATION' task, leading to inaccurate or incomplete codification. There's also a risk of cost overruns if the scope of work expands beyond the initial understanding, especially given the labor-hours pricing model. Dependence on DPRA INCORPORATED for specialized knowledge could also pose a risk if knowledge transfer is not adequately managed. Furthermore, if the competition, while full and open, did not yield a sufficiently competitive pool of bidders, the EPA might not have secured the absolute best value. Finally, delays in the contractor's performance could impact EPA's regulatory timelines or decision-making processes.
What is DPRA INCORPORATED's track record with federal contracts, particularly with the EPA?
Information regarding DPRA INCORPORATED's specific track record with federal contracts, and particularly with the EPA, is not provided in the data. To assess their track record, one would typically examine their past performance ratings on federal contracts, review contract award history to identify previous work with the EPA or similar agencies, and check for any past performance issues or disputes. A positive track record with relevant agencies and successful completion of similar environmental consulting tasks would indicate a lower performance risk. Conversely, a history of performance issues or limited relevant experience might raise concerns about their ability to successfully execute this contract.
How does the BPA Call mechanism influence the value and efficiency of this contract?
The Best Practices Agreement (BPA) Call mechanism is designed to enhance value and efficiency for recurring needs. By establishing a BPA, the EPA has already vetted and negotiated terms and pricing with potential vendors like DPRA INCORPORATED. A 'BPA Call' then represents a specific order placed against that established agreement. This process streamlines procurement, reduces administrative burden, and often allows for pre-negotiated, potentially discounted rates. For this contract, it implies that the EPA likely received competitive pricing during the initial BPA setup, and the call mechanism allows for rapid acquisition of services for the defined task. This can lead to cost savings and faster project initiation compared to a standalone, full solicitation process.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Environmental Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 10215 TECHNOLOGY DR STE 201, KNOXVILLE, TN, 37932
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $203,888
Exercised Options: $203,888
Current Obligation: $203,888
Actual Outlays: $203,888
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 68HE0822A0003
IDV Type: BPA
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-07-01
Current End Date: 2024-06-30
Potential End Date: 2024-06-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-02
More Contracts from Dpra Incorporated
- Joint Flow and Analysis System for Transportation — $27.4M (Department of Defense)
- 200604!000110!5700!fa4452!hq Amc/A7kf !gs00f0030l !C!N! !y!fa445206f0021! !20051003!20060930!962282356!962282356!062708292!n!dpra Incorporated !10215 Technology DR STE 20!knoxville !tn!37932!68328!163!17!scott AFB !ST. Clair !illinois !+000003110000!n!n!000000000000!d308!programming Services !S1 !services !000 !NOT Discernable !541511!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B!E!N! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !B!N! ! ! ! ! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $12.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Environmental Protection Agency Contracts
- Remedial Action Contract 2 — $383.3M (CH2M Hill, Inc)
- A&E Services — $309.2M (Sultrac, JV)
- Federal Contract — $181.4M (Weston Solutions Inc)
- Central Data Exchange (CDX) Support Services — $160.9M (CGI Federal Inc.)
- This Remedial Action Contract 2 Full Service (RAC 2 FS) for Epa's Region 8 Provides Professional Architect/Engineer, Technical, and Management Services to Support Remedial Response, Enforcement Oversight and Non-Time Critical Removal Activities Under Cercla, AS Amended by Sara; and the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance ACT Pursuant to the Federal Response Plan (FRP) and Other Laws to Help Address And/Or Mitigate Endangerment to the Public Health, Welfare or Environment, and to Support States and Communities in Preparing for Responses to Releases of Hazardous Substances, AS Well AS Counter-Terrorism — $145.9M (CDM Federal Programs Corporation)