Environmental Protection Agency awards $50,000 emergency spill response contract to Environmental Restoration LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $26,370 ($26.4K)

Contractor: Environmental Restoration LLC

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 2025-10-11

End Date: 2026-02-06

Contract Duration: 118 days

Daily Burn Rate: $223/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: REGION 5, (ERRS V); TASK ORDER FOR THE EMERGENCY RESPONSE AT XENIA OH HG SPILL SITE: (D51C) FOR $50,000.00.

Place of Performance

Location: CHICAGO, COOK County, ILLINOIS, 60604

State: Illinois Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $26,369.61 to ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION LLC for work described as: REGION 5, (ERRS V); TASK ORDER FOR THE EMERGENCY RESPONSE AT XENIA OH HG SPILL SITE: (D51C) FOR $50,000.00. Key points: 1. Contract awarded for emergency response services at a specific spill site. 2. The contract type is Time and Materials, indicating payment based on labor hours and material costs. 3. Competition was full and open after exclusion of sources, suggesting a deliberate but documented process. 4. The contract duration is 118 days, aligning with the nature of emergency response. 5. The awarded amount is $50,000, which is relatively small for environmental remediation contracts. 6. The contractor, Environmental Restoration LLC, is based in Illinois.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The awarded amount of $50,000 for emergency response is modest. Without specific details on the scope of the Xenia OH HG spill, it's difficult to benchmark against similar contracts. However, the Time and Materials pricing structure can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not closely monitored. The contract's value appears to be appropriate for a defined emergency task order rather than a large-scale remediation project.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' This indicates that while the competition was intended to be broad, specific sources may have been excluded for documented reasons. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' designation suggests an effort to solicit multiple offers.

Taxpayer Impact: This competition level aims to ensure fair pricing for taxpayers by allowing multiple qualified contractors to bid, fostering a competitive environment that can drive down costs.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the residents and environment of Xenia, Ohio, through the cleanup of a hazardous spill. Services delivered include emergency response and remediation at the specified spill site. The geographic impact is localized to the Xenia, Ohio, area. Workforce implications are likely limited to the specific personnel required for this emergency response task.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost escalation under Time and Materials if not tightly managed.
Limited transparency on the specific reasons for excluding certain sources in the 'full and open after exclusion' process.
Scope creep could increase costs beyond the initial $50,000 if not carefully controlled.

Positive Signals

Contract awarded for a critical emergency response need.
The 'full and open' competition, even with exclusions, suggests an attempt at broad market engagement.
Defined duration and task order limit the overall financial exposure.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Environmental Remediation Services sector, a subset of the broader Engineering and Construction industry. The market for environmental services is substantial, driven by regulatory compliance and the need to address historical contamination. This specific contract, however, represents a small, task-order-level engagement for emergency response, distinct from larger, long-term remediation projects.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract was specifically set aside for small businesses, nor is there information on subcontracting plans. Given the small award amount, it's possible small businesses could participate, but it's not a primary focus based on the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would typically be managed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) contracting officers and program managers. The Inspector General's office may also conduct audits or investigations if warranted. Transparency is limited by the nature of the data provided, but the contract details should be publicly accessible through federal procurement databases.

Related Government Programs

EPA Superfund Program
Hazardous Waste Management
Emergency Response Contracts
Environmental Consulting Services

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials pricing.
Limited transparency on source exclusion rationale.
Scope definition critical for managing emergency response costs.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $26,369.61 to ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION LLC. REGION 5, (ERRS V); TASK ORDER FOR THE EMERGENCY RESPONSE AT XENIA OH HG SPILL SITE: (D51C) FOR $50,000.00.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $26,369.61.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-10-11. End: 2026-02-06.

What is the track record of Environmental Restoration LLC with the EPA or similar agencies?

Information regarding the specific track record of Environmental Restoration LLC with the EPA or similar agencies is not provided in the data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing past performance evaluations, contract history, and any documented issues or successes on previous federal contracts. This would include examining their performance on similar emergency response or remediation tasks to gauge their reliability and effectiveness. Without this data, it's difficult to assess their suitability beyond the basic award information.

How does the $50,000 award compare to typical emergency spill response contracts?

The $50,000 award for emergency spill response is on the lower end for federal contracts, especially those involving environmental remediation. Emergency response needs can vary significantly in scale and complexity. Smaller incidents or initial containment efforts might fall within this budget. However, larger spills requiring extensive cleanup, long-term monitoring, or specialized equipment could easily exceed this amount by orders of magnitude. Benchmarking requires detailed information on the specific spill's characteristics, the required response actions, and the duration of the emergency.

What are the primary risks associated with this Time and Materials contract?

The primary risk with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract, especially for emergency response, is the potential for cost overruns if not managed diligently. Since payment is based on actual labor hours and material costs incurred, there's an incentive for longer task durations or higher-cost materials if oversight is lacking. For emergency situations, the urgency can sometimes lead to less stringent cost controls. Effective risk mitigation involves robust monitoring of hours, materials used, and ensuring the work performed directly addresses the emergency scope.

How effective is 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' in ensuring value for money?

This contracting approach aims to balance broad competition with specific needs or limitations. 'Full and Open' suggests an intent to solicit from the widest possible pool of qualified vendors. However, the 'exclusion of sources' clause implies that certain potential bidders were intentionally not considered, presumably for documented reasons (e.g., past performance issues, lack of specific capability, or national security concerns). While it can ensure value by allowing multiple bids, the exclusion of potentially competitive sources could theoretically limit price discovery and potentially increase costs compared to truly unrestricted full and open competition.

What is the historical spending pattern for emergency response services by the EPA?

Historical spending patterns for emergency response services by the EPA can be extensive and vary year to year based on the number and severity of environmental incidents. The EPA utilizes various contract vehicles, including task orders under larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts, to address emergencies. Spending can fluctuate significantly due to unpredictable events like natural disasters or industrial accidents. Analyzing historical data would reveal trends in contract types, average award values for different types of emergencies, and the primary contractors utilized, providing context for the current $50,000 award.

What are the implications of the contract being awarded to a contractor based in Illinois for a spill in Ohio?

The fact that Environmental Restoration LLC is based in Illinois (st) while the spill occurred in Ohio (region 5, Xenia OH) is not unusual for emergency response contracts. Federal agencies often contract with companies that have a national or regional presence, or the capability to mobilize quickly to any location. The key factors are the contractor's ability to respond promptly and effectively, regardless of their primary business location. The cost implications might include travel and per diem expenses, which would be factored into the Time and Materials pricing, but this is standard practice for mobilizing response teams.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1666 FABICK DR, FENTON, MO, 63026

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $26,370

Exercised Options: $26,370

Current Obligation: $26,370

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 68HE0422D0004

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline