GSA awards $2.37M contract for nonreflective vinyl lettering, highlighting hardware manufacturing sector needs

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,369 ($2.4K)

Contractor: Supply King USA, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-03

End Date: 2026-04-10

Contract Duration: 7 days

Daily Burn Rate: $338/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 999

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT

Sector: Other

Official Description: LETTER AND NUMERAL SET,SIGN: PLASTIC VINYL, BLACK, NONREFLECTIVE, PRESSURE SENSITIVE BACK

Place of Performance

Location: NANUET, ROCKLAND County, NEW YORK, 10954

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $2,368.8 to SUPPLY KING USA, LLC for work described as: LETTER AND NUMERAL SET,SIGN: PLASTIC VINYL, BLACK, NONREFLECTIVE, PRESSURE SENSITIVE BACK Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized signage, but detailed cost breakdown is needed for full assessment. 2. Full and open competition suggests a healthy market for this type of product. 3. Short contract duration (7 days) may indicate a need for rapid deployment or a specific, limited-use requirement. 4. The award to SUPPLY KING USA, LLC, requires further vetting of their past performance and capacity. 5. This contract falls within the broader hardware manufacturing sector, specifically addressing identification and labeling needs.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $2.37 million for a 7-day delivery order of vinyl lettering seems high for the quantity implied by the short duration. Benchmarking against similar, larger-volume signage contracts is difficult without more detail on the specific type and quantity of lettering. The fixed-price with economic price adjustment clause introduces potential for cost escalation, warranting close monitoring.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method is generally preferred for ensuring fair pricing and access to a wide range of suppliers. The specific number of bidders is not provided, which would offer further insight into the level of competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it typically drives down prices through market forces and encourages a broader base of suppliers, potentially leading to better value.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring identification and labeling for assets, facilities, or equipment will benefit from this contract. The services delivered include the manufacturing and supply of specialized vinyl lettering. The geographic impact is likely nationwide, as GSA contracts are typically available for use across federal agencies. Workforce implications are minimal, primarily related to the manufacturing and distribution operations of the awarded contractor.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for price increases due to the economic price adjustment clause.
Lack of detailed specifications on the lettering (size, font, material thickness) makes precise value assessment challenging.
Short delivery window could pose logistical challenges for the contractor and potentially impact quality if rushed.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process.
GSA contract vehicles are generally well-vetted and managed.
The contract specifies a fixed-price element, providing some cost certainty.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader manufacturing sector, specifically the production of signs and identification products. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 332510 (Hardware Manufacturing) is a broad category, but the product description points to specialized signage. The market for such items is driven by federal and commercial needs for asset tracking, safety signage, and branding.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside (ss: false) nor was there a subcontracting goal explicitly mentioned (sb: false). This suggests that the primary award was not directed towards small businesses, and there is no explicit requirement for the prime contractor to engage small businesses for subcontracting. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved in the supply chain or if the prime contractor voluntarily included them.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) oversees this contract through its Federal Acquisition Service. Oversight mechanisms likely include contract performance monitoring, financial audits, and adherence to federal procurement regulations. Transparency is generally maintained through GSA's contract award databases, although specific performance details may be less public. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

GSA Schedule 71 II K - Office Furniture, Furnishings and Related Services
Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) contracts
Identification and Labeling Supplies

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Economic Price Adjustment clause.
Lack of detailed product specifications hinders thorough value assessment.
Short contract duration may indicate rushed procurement or limited competition.
Contractor's past performance history requires verification.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $2,368.8 to SUPPLY KING USA, LLC. LETTER AND NUMERAL SET,SIGN: PLASTIC VINYL, BLACK, NONREFLECTIVE, PRESSURE SENSITIVE BACK

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SUPPLY KING USA, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2,368.8.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-03. End: 2026-04-10.

What is the specific quantity and detailed specification of the vinyl lettering being procured under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the exact quantity or detailed specifications (e.g., dimensions, thickness, adhesive type, specific colors beyond 'black') of the vinyl lettering. The description 'LETTER AND NUMERAL SET, SIGN: PLASTIC VINYL, BLACK, NONREFLECTIVE, PRESSURE SENSITIVE BACK' is generic. The contract value of $2.37 million for a 7-day delivery order suggests either a very large quantity or a high unit cost, which cannot be determined without more granular product details. This lack of specificity makes it difficult to perform a precise value-for-money analysis or compare it accurately to market rates for similar items.

How does the unit cost of this vinyl lettering compare to commercial market rates or other federal contracts?

Without specific quantity and detailed specifications, a direct unit cost comparison is not feasible. The total contract value of $2.37 million for a 7-day delivery order is substantial. If this represents a large volume of standard vinyl lettering, the implied unit cost could be significantly higher than typical commercial rates. Conversely, if it includes specialized customization, expedited production, or installation services not explicitly mentioned, the cost might be justified. Benchmarking requires access to more detailed contract line item details or comparable commercial price lists for identical or highly similar products.

What is the track record of SUPPLY KING USA, LLC in fulfilling federal contracts, particularly for signage or similar manufactured goods?

Information on SUPPLY KING USA, LLC's specific track record for federal contracts, especially for signage or manufactured goods, is not detailed in the provided data. While the company is listed as the awardee, its past performance ratings, history of on-time delivery, quality of goods provided, and experience with similar contract types (like fixed-price with economic price adjustment) are crucial for assessing risk. A review of the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) or other performance databases would be necessary to evaluate their reliability and suitability for this contract.

What is the rationale behind the fixed-price with economic price adjustment (FP-EPA) contract type for this procurement?

The use of a Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment (FP-EPA) contract type for vinyl lettering suggests that the government anticipates potential fluctuations in the cost of raw materials (like vinyl or adhesives) or labor over the contract period. This clause allows for price adjustments based on an agreed-upon index or formula, aiming to protect both the contractor from unforeseen cost increases and the government from excessive initial pricing. For a short 7-day duration, the need for EPA might seem less critical unless there are immediate and volatile market shifts anticipated for the specific materials used.

What is the expected impact of this contract on the overall federal spending for hardware manufacturing or signage supplies?

A single contract award of $2.37 million, while significant for the contractor, represents a relatively small portion of the overall federal spending within the broad hardware manufacturing or signage supply categories. Federal agencies collectively spend billions annually on a wide array of manufactured goods and services. This contract specifically addresses a niche requirement for vinyl lettering, likely serving a particular set of agency needs. Its impact on the total federal outlay for these sectors would be marginal, but it contributes to the aggregate spending within the relevant NAICS code.

Are there any specific risks associated with the short 7-day delivery period for this contract?

The extremely short 7-day delivery period presents several potential risks. For the contractor, it necessitates rapid production, quality control, and logistics, which could lead to errors, rushed work, or increased costs if not managed efficiently. For the government, it raises questions about the urgency of the need and whether this short timeframe compromises the ability to conduct thorough market research or secure the best possible pricing. It could also indicate a reactive procurement rather than planned, potentially leading to less favorable terms or reliance on a single source if competition is limited by the tight deadline.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Hardware Manufacturing › Hardware Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: CLEANING EQPT AND SUPPLIES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QSMD20R0001

Offers Received: 999

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT (K)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 55 OLD NYACK TPKE STE 210, NANUET, NY, 10954

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,369

Exercised Options: $2,369

Current Obligation: $2,369

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSHA22D0022

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline