Forest Service awards $587K for tree planting stakes, with 9 bidders indicating competitive pricing

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $58,752 ($58.8K)

Contractor: Supply King USA, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Agriculture

Start Date: 2026-04-07

End Date: 2026-05-20

Contract Duration: 43 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.4K/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 9

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: DESCHUTES NF STAKES FOR TREE PLANTING

Place of Performance

Location: BEND, DESCHUTES County, OREGON, 97701

State: Oregon Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Agriculture obligated $58,752 to SUPPLY KING USA, LLC for work described as: DESCHUTES NF STAKES FOR TREE PLANTING Key points: 1. The contract for tree planting stakes appears to be a cost-effective procurement, given the competitive bidding process. 2. Multiple bidders suggest a healthy market for these supplies, potentially driving down prices. 3. The short performance period and fixed-price nature of the award mitigate some performance risks. 4. This award supports reforestation efforts, a key environmental service. 5. The contract falls within the broader category of nursery and tree production supplies. 6. The relatively small award value suggests it is not a major driver of market dynamics.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The award value of $587,520 for tree planting stakes is modest. Without specific unit cost data or a detailed breakdown of the stakes' specifications, a direct comparison to similar contracts is challenging. However, the presence of 9 bidders in a competed procurement suggests that the pricing achieved is likely competitive and reflects market rates for such supplies. The fixed-price nature of the purchase order also provides cost certainty.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was competed under the Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), indicating a full and open competition for a procurement valued below the threshold for sealed bidding. The participation of 9 bidders is a strong indicator of robust competition for these specific supplies. A higher number of bidders generally leads to better price discovery and ensures that the government receives competitive offers.

Taxpayer Impact: The strong competition in this procurement is beneficial for taxpayers, as it likely resulted in a lower overall price for the necessary tree planting stakes compared to a sole-source or limited competition scenario.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Forest Service, which will receive the necessary stakes for tree planting operations. These stakes are crucial for supporting young trees during reforestation efforts, contributing to forest health and ecosystem restoration. The geographic impact is focused on Oregon, where the Forest Service will utilize these supplies. The contract supports the workforce involved in nursery operations and potentially those involved in tree planting activities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for minor delays if the supplier faces unforeseen production or logistical issues, given the short delivery window.
Quality control of the stakes is essential to ensure they effectively support tree saplings without premature degradation.

Positive Signals

The fixed-price contract provides cost certainty and limits the government's exposure to cost overruns.
The competitive bidding process suggests a good likelihood of receiving quality products at a fair market price.
The short performance period minimizes the duration of potential risks and ensures timely delivery for the planting season.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader 'Other Services' or 'Supplies' category, specifically related to forestry and land management. The market for nursery supplies and related equipment is diverse, serving both government and private sector needs for reforestation, agriculture, and landscaping. While specific benchmarks for tree planting stakes are not readily available, the competitive nature of this award suggests pricing is aligned with general market conditions for similar horticultural or land management supplies.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract was specifically set aside for small businesses. However, the procurement was conducted under Simplified Acquisition Procedures, which often encourage small business participation. It is possible that small businesses were among the 9 bidders. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities exist or if small businesses were significantly involved in the supply chain.

Oversight & Accountability

As a purchase order issued by the Forest Service, oversight is managed through the agency's procurement and financial management systems. Accountability is ensured through the terms and conditions of the purchase order, including delivery schedules and specifications. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases where such awards are reported. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Reforestation Programs
Forest Management Supplies
Nursery Stock Procurement
Environmental Restoration Contracts

Risk Flags

Short performance period could indicate urgency or a specific project timeline.
Lack of detailed specifications requires reliance on contractor's standard offerings.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Agriculture awarded $58,752 to SUPPLY KING USA, LLC. DESCHUTES NF STAKES FOR TREE PLANTING

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SUPPLY KING USA, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Agriculture (Forest Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $58,752.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-07. End: 2026-05-20.

What is the typical lifespan and material composition of these tree planting stakes, and how do they compare to industry standards?

The provided data does not specify the material composition or expected lifespan of the tree planting stakes. Typically, such stakes are made from wood, plastic, or metal, with lifespans varying from a few months to several years depending on the material and environmental conditions. Industry standards often dictate durability requirements based on the intended use, such as the duration of support needed for saplings. Without more detailed specifications from the contract, it's difficult to benchmark these particular stakes against industry norms. Further review of the purchase order's line item details or technical specifications would be necessary to assess their quality and longevity relative to common practices in reforestation.

How does the per-unit cost of these stakes compare to similar procurements by other federal agencies or state forestry departments?

The provided data does not include the per-unit cost of the stakes, only the total award amount ($587,520) and the number of items procured (implied by the need for 9 bidders to compete). To compare per-unit costs, we would need the quantity of stakes purchased. Assuming a quantity, we could then calculate a unit price and benchmark it against publicly available data from other federal agencies (e.g., through FPDS or GSA Advantage) or state forestry departments. Given that this was a competed procurement with 9 bidders, it is reasonable to infer that the achieved unit price is likely competitive within the market for these specific stakes. However, a definitive comparison requires the quantity information.

What is the track record of SUPPLY KING USA, LLC in providing similar forestry or nursery supplies to the government?

Information regarding the specific track record of SUPPLY KING USA, LLC in providing similar forestry or nursery supplies to the government is not detailed in the provided data snippet. A comprehensive assessment would require searching federal procurement databases (like FPDS or SAM.gov) for past awards to this contractor. This would reveal their history of performance, contract types, values, and agencies served. Understanding their past performance, especially on similar items, is crucial for evaluating the reliability and potential risks associated with this current award. Without this historical data, we assume satisfactory performance based on the award being made.

What are the specific reforestation goals or projects in Oregon that this purchase of stakes is intended to support?

The provided data indicates the contract is for 'DESCHUTES NF STAKES FOR TREE PLANTING' and the state is 'OREGON'. This strongly suggests the stakes are intended to support reforestation efforts within the Deschutes National Forest in Oregon. The specific goals would likely involve planting new trees to restore areas affected by wildfires, insect infestations, or historical logging practices. These efforts contribute to ecological resilience, habitat restoration, carbon sequestration, and timber resource management. Detailed project plans for the Deschutes National Forest would outline the precise acreage, species to be planted, and the role these stakes play in ensuring sapling survival and growth.

How does the $587,520 award value compare to historical Forest Service spending on tree planting stakes or similar reforestation materials?

The provided data does not offer historical spending figures for the Forest Service on tree planting stakes or similar materials. To make such a comparison, one would need to query historical procurement data for the Forest Service, filtering for relevant product service codes (PSCs) or keywords related to reforestation supplies. Analyzing past awards would reveal trends in spending, average award values, and the frequency of such procurements. This specific award of $587,520 appears to be a single purchase order with a short duration, suggesting it might be for a specific project or a portion of annual needs rather than a large, multi-year contract. Without historical context, it's difficult to determine if this amount is typical, high, or low.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting › Greenhouse, Nursery, and Floriculture Production › Nursery and Tree Production

Product/Service Code: PIPE, TUBING, HOSE, AND FITTINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Solicitation ID: 1240BE26Q0017

Offers Received: 9

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 55 OLD NYACK TPKE STE 210, NANUET, NY, 10954

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $58,752

Exercised Options: $58,752

Current Obligation: $58,752

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline