GSA awards $2,346 contract for 25-yard PVC flooring to RM BILTRITE LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,346 ($2.3K)

Contractor: RM Biltrite LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-02

End Date: 2026-04-10

Contract Duration: 8 days

Daily Burn Rate: $293/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: MATTING,FLOOR5562, TYPEI, PVC, 25 YARDS LONG, 36 INCHES WIDE, 0.125 INCH THICK, MARBLED OR MOTTLED BLUE, FIRST ARTICLETESTING REQUIREDREDREDREDRED

Place of Performance

Location: ATLANTA, FULTON County, GEORGIA, 30350

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $2,346 to RM BILTRITE LLC for work described as: MATTING,FLOOR5562, TYPEI, PVC, 25 YARDS LONG, 36 INCHES WIDE, 0.125 INCH THICK, MARBLED OR MOTTLED BLUE, FIRST ARTICLETESTING REQUIREDREDREDREDRED Key points: 1. The contract value is relatively small, suggesting a specific, limited need. 2. The award was made under the Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), indicating a focus on efficiency for smaller purchases. 3. The fixed-price contract type helps manage cost certainty for the government. 4. The product specification is detailed, ensuring the government receives a precise material. 5. The contract duration is short, aligning with the likely limited scope of the requirement. 6. The award to RM BILTRITE LLC suggests a competitive process within the SAP framework, though details are limited.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $2,346 is modest. Without specific benchmarks for this exact type and quantity of PVC flooring, a direct value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the use of SAP suggests the government aimed for an efficient procurement process for this relatively small purchase. The firm fixed-price nature of the award provides cost certainty. Further analysis would require comparing the unit price to market rates for similar industrial-grade PVC flooring.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was competed under SAP (Simplified Acquisition Procedures), which typically allows for a broader range of competition than sole-source but may not always reach full and open competition. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but SAP is designed to encourage competition among qualified vendors for purchases below certain thresholds. This approach balances the need for competition with procurement efficiency.

Taxpayer Impact: For taxpayers, competing under SAP aims to secure fair pricing while streamlining the acquisition process for smaller dollar amounts, avoiding the administrative burden of larger-scale competitive solicitations.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the agency requiring the specific type of PVC flooring for its facilities. The service delivered is the provision of 25 yards of Type I PVC flooring, 36 inches wide and 0.125 inches thick, with a marbled or mottled blue finish. The geographic impact is likely localized to the facility where the flooring will be installed, with the award originating from the Federal Acquisition Service. There are no significant workforce implications associated with this specific material purchase.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited transparency on the specific competition details within SAP.
Lack of detailed cost breakdown to fully assess unit price competitiveness.

Positive Signals

Use of a firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Awarded under SAP, indicating an effort towards efficient procurement for smaller buys.
Detailed product specifications ensure the material meets requirements.

Sector Analysis

The plastics product manufacturing sector (NAICS 326199) encompasses a wide range of plastic goods. This contract falls into a niche within this sector, focusing on specific industrial flooring materials. Comparable spending benchmarks for this exact product are difficult to ascertain without more market data, but the overall market for industrial flooring is substantial, serving various government and commercial needs.

Small Business Impact

Information regarding small business set-asides or subcontracting plans is not available for this specific award. As the contract was competed under SAP and the award value is relatively low, it may not have triggered specific small business subcontracting requirements. Further investigation would be needed to determine if RM BILTRITE LLC is a small business or if any subcontracting opportunities were generated.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Federal Acquisition Service. Standard procurement regulations and GSA policies govern the award and execution. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance monitoring specifics are not publicly available for such small awards. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud or mismanagement.

Related Government Programs

GSA Schedules
Federal Supply Schedules
Building Materials Procurement
Industrial Flooring Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for non-compliance with exact material specifications.
Risk of delivery delays, though mitigated by short contract duration.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $2,346 to RM BILTRITE LLC. MATTING,FLOOR5562, TYPEI, PVC, 25 YARDS LONG, 36 INCHES WIDE, 0.125 INCH THICK, MARBLED OR MOTTLED BLUE, FIRST ARTICLETESTING REQUIREDREDREDREDRED

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is RM BILTRITE LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2,346.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-02. End: 2026-04-10.

What is the track record of RM BILTRITE LLC with federal contracts?

A review of federal procurement data indicates that RM BILTRITE LLC has received multiple federal contracts, primarily through GSA Schedules and other competitive vehicles. These awards span various types of flooring and related materials. The contract history suggests the company is an established supplier to the federal government. Analyzing the performance history, including any past issues or commendations, would provide further insight into their reliability and quality of service. However, without specific contract performance reports, a comprehensive assessment remains limited to award data.

How does the unit price of this flooring compare to market rates?

The provided data does not include a specific unit price, only the total award amount ($2,346) for 25 yards of flooring. To benchmark the unit price, we would need to know the cost per yard or per square foot. Assuming a standard yard is 3 feet wide, 25 yards would be 75 linear feet, or 225 square feet. This would place the cost at approximately $10.43 per square foot. Comparing this to market rates for industrial-grade, specific-specification PVC flooring would require accessing commercial pricing databases or recent government solicitations for similar materials. Without this comparative data, it is difficult to definitively assess if the price is competitive.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract?

The primary risks associated with this contract are relatively low due to its small value and short duration. Potential risks include the possibility of receiving material that does not precisely meet the detailed specifications (e.g., color, thickness, durability), leading to installation issues or premature wear. Another risk is potential delivery delays, although the short performance period minimizes this impact. Contractor performance issues, such as poor quality control or responsiveness, are also a general risk, though less likely to have significant financial or operational impact on this scale. The firm fixed-price nature mitigates cost overrun risks for the government.

How effective is the Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) in ensuring value for this type of purchase?

SAP is designed to provide a balance between competition and efficiency for purchases below the simplified acquisition threshold (currently $250,000). For a $2,346 purchase, SAP is generally effective in streamlining the process, reducing administrative burden, and potentially allowing for quicker delivery. The effectiveness in ensuring value depends on the specific competition achieved within the SAP framework. While SAP encourages competition, the level of vendor engagement might be lower than in larger, full-and-open solicitations. The use of GSA's Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) channels, potentially through BPA calls, suggests an established process that aims to leverage existing agreements and competition.

What is the historical spending pattern for this type of flooring by the GSA?

Historical spending data for this specific type of PVC flooring (Type I, 0.125-inch thick, marbled/mottled blue, 25 yards) by GSA is not readily available in aggregated public databases. GSA procures a vast array of materials and services. Spending on flooring materials is likely distributed across various contracts, schedules, and task orders, often categorized under broader headings like 'Building Materials' or 'Maintenance, Repair, and Operations (MRO) supplies.' Analyzing GSA's overall spending on flooring or related construction materials could provide context, but pinpointing historical patterns for this exact specification would require deep-dive data analysis within GSA's internal procurement systems or extensive contract file reviews.

Are there any specific performance metrics tied to this contract?

The provided data does not specify any unique performance metrics beyond the delivery of the correct material by the specified dates. For a contract of this size and nature, performance is typically measured by adherence to the contract terms: delivery of the correct quantity and quality of goods by the specified delivery date. Acceptance of the material by the government serves as the primary indicator of performance. More complex performance metrics are usually reserved for larger, service-oriented, or technically demanding contracts where ongoing evaluation is necessary.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Plastics Product Manufacturing › All Other Plastics Product Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: HOUSEHOLD/COMMERC FURNISH/APPLIANCE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Solicitation ID: 47QSWA21Q1211

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 8525 DUNWOODY PL, ATLANTA, GA, 30350

Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,346

Exercised Options: $2,346

Current Obligation: $2,346

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSWA21T000V

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline