GSA Awards $14.5K for Installation Tool, Ring to Curtiss-Wright, Lacking Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,554 ($14.6K)

Contractor: Kaufman Company, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-03

End Date: 2027-04-03

Contract Duration: 365 days

Daily Burn Rate: $40/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: INSTALLATION TOOL, RING: CURTISS-WRIGHT ELECTRO-MECHANICAL CORP. PN 14327N18A (PARTIAL DESCRIPTION)

Place of Performance

Location: NORWOOD, NORFOLK County, MASSACHUSETTS, 02062

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $14,553.5 to KAUFMAN COMPANY, INC. for work described as: INSTALLATION TOOL, RING: CURTISS-WRIGHT ELECTRO-MECHANICAL CORP. PN 14327N18A (PARTIAL DESCRIPTION) Key points: 1. The contract for an installation tool, ring (PN 14327N18A) was awarded to Curtiss-Wright Electro-Mechanical Corp. 2. The total award amount is $14,553.50. 3. The contract was not competed under the Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP). 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 332216 (Saw Blade and Handtool Manufacturing). 5. The contract is for a duration of 365 days.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The pricing for this specific installation tool is difficult to assess without competitive bids. The award amount of $14,553.50 for a single unit over a year seems potentially high for a handtool, but a direct comparison is not feasible.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was not competed under SAP, indicating a potential lack of broad market solicitation. The award method as a Purchase Order suggests a direct procurement, which may limit price discovery and competition.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition raises concerns about whether taxpayers received the best possible price for this item.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may not have received the most cost-effective solution due to the absence of competitive bidding. The procurement process could be improved by exploring more competitive avenues for tool acquisition. The specific part number and description are limited, potentially hindering future market research and competition.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 40 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The procurement falls under the General Services Administration's Federal Acquisition Service, which often handles a wide range of supplies and services. Benchmarks for handtools vary significantly based on complexity and intended use.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this procurement, either as the prime contractor or as potential subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business set-asides were considered.

Oversight & Accountability

The use of a Purchase Order and the lack of competition under SAP suggest that standard oversight mechanisms for competitive bidding may not have been fully utilized. Reviewing the justification for non-competition is crucial.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

saw-blade-and-handtool-manufacturing, general-services-administration, ma, purchase-order, under-100k

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $14,553.5 to KAUFMAN COMPANY, INC.. INSTALLATION TOOL, RING: CURTISS-WRIGHT ELECTRO-MECHANICAL CORP. PN 14327N18A (PARTIAL DESCRIPTION)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is KAUFMAN COMPANY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14,553.5.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-03. End: 2027-04-03.

What is the justification for not competing this purchase under SAP, and what is the estimated cost savings if it had been competed?

The justification for not competing under SAP is not provided in the data. Without competitive bids, it's impossible to definitively state estimated cost savings. However, competitive processes typically yield savings ranging from 10% to 30% or more, depending on the market and item.

What are the specific risks associated with procuring this installation tool without competition?

The primary risks include paying a higher price than necessary, receiving a product that does not fully meet the agency's needs if requirements were not thoroughly defined, and potentially missing out on innovative solutions offered by other manufacturers. It also sets a precedent for non-competitive awards.

How effective is this procurement in terms of delivering value for taxpayer money, given the limited competition?

The effectiveness in delivering value is questionable. While the agency obtained the tool, the lack of competition suggests that the price paid may not represent the best value achievable. Without a competitive process, it's difficult to ascertain if the government secured optimal terms and pricing.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingCutlery and Handtool ManufacturingSaw Blade and Handtool Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MEASURING TOOLS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 19 WALKHILL RD, NORWOOD, MA, 02062

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $14,554

Exercised Options: $14,554

Current Obligation: $14,554

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline

Start Date: 2026-04-03

Current End Date: 2027-04-03

Potential End Date: 2027-04-03 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-05

More Contracts from Kaufman Company, Inc.

View all Kaufman Company, Inc. federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending