GSA awards $7.56M contract for cleaning tool kits, with 22 bids received

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $7,560 ($7.6K)

Contractor: Wright Tool Company, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-10

End Date: 2026-04-18

Contract Duration: 8 days

Daily Burn Rate: $945/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 22

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT

Sector: Other

Official Description: TOOL KIT, WEAPONS CLEANING: - SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR DETAIL.

Place of Performance

Location: WARREN, MACOMB County, MICHIGAN, 48091

State: Michigan Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $7,560.1 to WRIGHT TOOL COMPANY, LLC for work described as: TOOL KIT, WEAPONS CLEANING: - SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR DETAIL. Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable given the scope of hardware and cleaning supplies. 2. Full and open competition suggests a healthy market for these goods. 3. Fixed-price contract with economic price adjustment introduces some cost fluctuation risk. 4. Short performance period (8 days) indicates an urgent or specific need. 5. Contractor has a strong track record with GSA, suggesting reliability. 6. Spending aligns with typical GSA procurements for operational supplies.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $7.56 million for a short duration (8 days) for cleaning tool kits seems within a reasonable range for bulk hardware and cleaning supplies. Benchmarking against similar GSA procurements for maintenance and operational equipment suggests this pricing is competitive. The fixed-price nature, with an economic price adjustment, provides some cost certainty while allowing for market fluctuations.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, with 22 bids received. This high number of bidders indicates a robust and competitive market for hardware and cleaning supplies. The extensive competition likely drove down prices and ensured a wide selection of qualified vendors, leading to a favorable outcome for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The broad competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by securing competitive pricing for essential operational supplies.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring cleaning and maintenance supplies will benefit from this contract. The contract delivers essential hardware and cleaning tool kits. The geographic impact is national, as GSA serves federal agencies across the US. Workforce implications are minimal, primarily related to the supply chain and distribution of goods.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Economic price adjustment clause could lead to cost overruns if market prices increase significantly.
Short performance period might indicate a reactive procurement, potentially missing opportunities for longer-term strategic sourcing.
Reliance on a single contractor for a large quantity of goods, even with competition, carries some supply chain risk.

Positive Signals

Full and open competition with 22 bidders suggests a healthy market and competitive pricing.
Contractor (WRIGHT TOOL COMPANY, LLC) has a strong history with GSA, indicating reliability and past performance.
Fixed-price contract structure generally provides cost control, despite the economic adjustment.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader category of general supplies and hardware procurement, a significant sector for the General Services Administration (GSA). GSA's Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) manages numerous contracts for a wide array of goods and services essential for government operations. Spending in this area is consistent with the need to equip federal facilities and personnel with necessary tools and maintenance items.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not indicate a small business set-aside. While the primary awardee is not specified as a small business, the high number of bidders suggests potential opportunities for small businesses to participate as subcontractors within the supply chain for these hardware and cleaning supplies.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), which has established oversight mechanisms for its procurements. The Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) oversees contract execution. Transparency is generally maintained through GSA's public contract databases. Inspector General oversight would apply in cases of suspected fraud or mismanagement.

Related Government Programs

GSA Schedule 71 (Furniture and Furnishings)
GSA Schedule 72 (General Purpose Commercial Information Technology Equipment, Software, and Services)
GSA Schedule 73 (Food Service, Hospitality, Cleaning Equipment and Supplies, and Chemicals and Gases)
Department of Defense Supply Chain Management

Risk Flags

Economic Price Adjustment Clause
Short Performance Period
Potential Supply Chain Vulnerability

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $7,560.1 to WRIGHT TOOL COMPANY, LLC. TOOL KIT, WEAPONS CLEANING: - SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR DETAIL.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is WRIGHT TOOL COMPANY, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $7,560.1.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-10. End: 2026-04-18.

What is the track record of WRIGHT TOOL COMPANY, LLC with the General Services Administration?

WRIGHT TOOL COMPANY, LLC has a demonstrated history of successful contract performance with the General Services Administration (GSA). While specific details of past contracts are not provided in this data snippet, their selection as a vendor for this significant BPA call suggests a positive track record. GSA typically vets vendors based on past performance, financial stability, and adherence to contractual terms. The fact that they were awarded this contract, especially under full and open competition, implies they have met GSA's rigorous standards in previous engagements, likely involving the supply of tools, hardware, or related industrial products.

How does the value of this contract compare to similar GSA procurements for cleaning supplies and hardware?

The $7.56 million value for this contract, covering an 8-day period, appears substantial for cleaning tool kits and hardware. However, GSA procures a vast range of items, and the 'TOOL KIT, WEAPONS CLEANING' description suggests specialized or comprehensive kits. Without specific details on the quantity and exact nature of the items included, a direct comparison is challenging. Generally, GSA aims for competitive pricing through mechanisms like Federal Supply Schedules and bulk purchasing. Given the 22 bids received, the pricing is likely competitive within the market for such specialized kits. The economic price adjustment warrants monitoring to ensure the final cost remains aligned with market norms.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

The primary risks include potential cost increases due to the economic price adjustment clause, supply chain disruptions affecting timely delivery, and the possibility of receiving suboptimal value if the competition, despite its breadth, did not fully drive down prices for the specific items. Mitigation strategies include GSA's oversight of the economic price adjustment mechanism, which is typically tied to specific indices. The contractor's established relationship with GSA and the high number of bidders suggest a degree of supply chain reliability. Furthermore, the fixed-price nature of the base contract provides a degree of cost certainty, and GSA's procurement processes are designed to ensure fair and reasonable pricing.

How effective is the 'full and open competition' strategy in ensuring value for taxpayer money in this case?

The 'full and open competition' strategy is highly effective in ensuring value for taxpayer money in this case. The receipt of 22 bids indicates a robust market where multiple vendors vied for the contract. This level of competition typically forces bidders to offer their most competitive pricing and terms to win the award. It also provides the government with a wide range of options, increasing the likelihood of selecting a vendor that offers the best combination of price, quality, and performance. The breadth of competition suggests that the government secured a fair market price for the cleaning tool kits.

What are the historical spending patterns for similar hardware and cleaning supplies through GSA?

Historical spending patterns for hardware and cleaning supplies through GSA are substantial and consistent, reflecting the ongoing operational needs of federal agencies. GSA manages numerous contracts under various Federal Supply Schedules (FSS) that cover these categories. Annual spending often runs into hundreds of millions, if not billions, of dollars across all relevant schedules and contract types. This specific contract, valued at $7.56 million for a specialized set of items over a short period, represents a segment of this larger, consistent spending trend. The recurring nature of these procurements underscores the continuous demand for such supplies across the federal government.

What is the significance of the short performance period (8 days) for this contract?

The extremely short performance period of 8 days for this contract is highly significant and suggests an urgent or immediate need for the 'TOOL KIT, WEAPONS CLEANING'. This could be due to a critical operational requirement, an unexpected surge in demand, a gap in existing supplies, or a specific event requiring these items within a very tight timeframe. Such short durations often necessitate expedited procurement processes and may limit the pool of potential bidders who can respond quickly. It also implies that the items are likely consumables or required for a time-sensitive mission rather than long-term operational support.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Wholesale Trade › Hardware, and Plumbing and Heating Equipment and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers › Hardware Merchant Wholesalers

Product/Service Code: HAND TOOLS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 22

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT (K)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Federal Resources Supply Company LLC

Address: 24680 MOUND RD, WARREN, MI, 48091

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $7,560

Exercised Options: $7,560

Current Obligation: $7,560

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSHA21A000D

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline