GSA awards $29M contract for wood furniture to Sustainable Furniture Inc., highlighting potential value and competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $29,082 ($29.1K)

Contractor: Sustainable Furniture Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-08

End Date: 2026-06-07

Contract Duration: 60 days

Daily Burn Rate: $485/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: BED,BUNKABLESSSSSSSSSSSSSS

Place of Performance

Location: SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO County, CALIFORNIA, 95828

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $29,081.5 to SUSTAINABLE FURNITURE INC for work described as: BED,BUNKABLESSSSSSSSSSSSSS Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single vendor, raising questions about competition and potential for cost savings. 2. The contract duration of 60 days suggests a specific, short-term need for furniture. 3. Focus on nonupholstered wood household furniture indicates a niche market segment. 4. The award method (BPA Call) implies a pre-negotiated agreement, potentially streamlining the process. 5. Geographic focus on California may indicate regional demand or specific installation requirements.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this $29 million contract is challenging without specific item details or comparison to similar large-scale furniture procurements. The fixed-price nature suggests cost certainty for the government, but the absence of multiple bids in this specific call-off could mean less aggressive pricing. Further analysis would require understanding the unit costs of the furniture provided and comparing them to industry standards for similar quality and materials.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors were eligible to bid. However, the specific award mechanism as a BPA Call suggests that this particular order was placed against an existing Blanket Purchase Agreement. The number of bidders for this specific call-off is not detailed, but the overall competition for the BPA itself would have been established previously.

Taxpayer Impact: While full and open competition is generally beneficial for taxpayers, the specifics of this BPA Call require further scrutiny to ensure optimal price discovery for this particular furniture requirement.

Public Impact

Federal agencies in California requiring nonupholstered wood household furniture will benefit from this contract. The contract will deliver essential furniture items, potentially for temporary installations, housing, or office spaces. The geographic impact is concentrated within California, serving federal facilities in the state. Workforce implications are likely minimal, primarily related to the manufacturing and delivery of furniture by the contractor.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific unit pricing makes it difficult to assess true value for money.
Limited contract duration may not reflect long-term furniture needs or potential for sustained savings.
Concentration on a single vendor for this call-off warrants review of competition dynamics.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, ensuring a broad initial vendor pool.
Fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
BPA Call mechanism can expedite delivery for urgent needs.

Sector Analysis

The furniture manufacturing sector is diverse, with significant government spending on office, residential, and specialized furnishings. This contract falls within the Nonupholstered Wood Household Furniture Manufacturing subsector (NAICS 337122). Government procurement of furniture is a substantial market, often influenced by factors like agency needs, sustainability requirements, and bulk purchasing agreements. Benchmarking this $29 million award requires comparison against similar large-scale furniture procurements, considering material, quality, and delivery scope.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary impact on small businesses would be through potential subcontracting opportunities offered by Sustainable Furniture Inc. or through competition for future BPAs or contracts in this sector. Without specific subcontracting plans, it's difficult to quantify the direct benefit to the small business ecosystem from this particular award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Federal Acquisition Service. Mechanisms likely include contract performance monitoring, invoice review, and adherence to the terms and conditions of the Blanket Purchase Agreement and the specific call-off order. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics may not always be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

GSA Schedules Program
Federal Supply Schedule Contracts
Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs)
Office Furniture Procurement
Government Housing Furnishings

Risk Flags

Limited competition for this specific BPA Call.
Short contract duration may indicate rushed procurement or temporary need.
Lack of detailed unit pricing hinders value assessment.
Geographic concentration on California.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $29,081.5 to SUSTAINABLE FURNITURE INC. BED,BUNKABLESSSSSSSSSSSSSS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SUSTAINABLE FURNITURE INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $29,081.5.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-08. End: 2026-06-07.

What is the typical track record of Sustainable Furniture Inc. with federal contracts?

A review of federal contract databases would be necessary to ascertain Sustainable Furniture Inc.'s track record. This would involve examining past awards, contract performance history, any reported disputes or terminations, and overall value of previous federal engagements. Understanding their history with GSA and other agencies can provide insights into their reliability, quality of products, and ability to meet federal procurement requirements. Without specific data on past performance, it's difficult to assess their suitability beyond the current award.

How does the $29 million value compare to similar furniture procurements by GSA?

Comparing the $29 million value requires context regarding the scope and duration of similar furniture procurements. GSA often awards large contracts for furniture, but the specific type (nonupholstered wood household furniture) and the 60-day duration of this BPA Call suggest a potentially specialized or urgent need. Benchmarking against contracts for office furniture, dormitory furnishings, or other categories would be relevant. A higher value for a similar quantity and quality of goods would indicate potential overpricing, while a lower value might suggest favorable negotiation or economies of scale.

What are the key risk indicators associated with this contract?

Key risk indicators include the limited competition evident in this specific BPA Call, which could lead to suboptimal pricing. The short duration (60 days) might indicate a rushed procurement or a temporary need, potentially masking longer-term requirements or cost inefficiencies. Furthermore, the lack of detailed product specifications in the provided data makes it difficult to assess the quality and suitability of the furniture, posing a risk of receiving goods that do not meet agency standards. The concentration on a single vendor for this call-off also presents a risk if performance issues arise.

How effective is the BPA Call mechanism for ensuring value in furniture procurement?

The Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call mechanism is designed to streamline the procurement process for recurring needs by establishing pre-negotiated terms and conditions. For furniture, it can expedite delivery and potentially offer better pricing if the underlying BPA was competitively awarded. However, the effectiveness in ensuring value for a specific call-off depends heavily on the initial competition for the BPA and the specific pricing negotiated for the call. If the BPA competition was robust, a call-off can be efficient. If not, it may limit price discovery for individual orders.

What are the historical spending patterns for nonupholstered wood household furniture by GSA?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for nonupholstered wood household furniture by GSA would involve reviewing procurement data over several fiscal years. This would reveal trends in contract values, types of furniture purchased, primary vendors, and average prices. Understanding these patterns can help contextualize the current $29 million award, indicating whether it represents a typical expenditure, an increase, or a decrease in spending for this category. It can also highlight shifts in agency needs or market dynamics within the furniture sector.

What is the potential impact of this contract on the furniture market in California?

A $29 million contract awarded to a single vendor for furniture within California could have a notable impact on the regional market. It signifies a substantial demand from federal agencies in the state, potentially boosting the revenue and production for Sustainable Furniture Inc. and its supply chain. Depending on the scale of operations and existing capacity, this could influence local employment in manufacturing and logistics. However, it might also limit opportunities for other regional furniture suppliers who were not awarded this specific BPA Call, potentially concentrating market share.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Household and Institutional Furniture and Kitchen Cabinet Manufacturing › Nonupholstered Wood Household Furniture Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: FURNITURE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5800 ALDER AVE, SACRAMENTO, CA, 95828

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $29,082

Exercised Options: $29,082

Current Obligation: $29,082

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSMA23A08N6

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline